Duck and Cover

Ahh, this is that kind of forum.

Well, have fun guys, sorry to bother.

This is another case of rose tinted glasses syndrome. And that is where you lose all legitimacy in your argument. :wheelie: I am sorry if you feel that way, but revisionism isn't a valid argument. The Fallout series pushed you into several non-choices in order to move the plot along long before Fal...

You're ignoring the point. I would say there is a great deal of that going around. You claimed Fallout 3 played like Call of Duty. I listed a bunch of reasons why the two are radically different even if you narrow down the focus strictly to battle. And if you want to argue there is little death of ...

Since I'm pressed for time due to having to go to work, I just wanted to address this. Fallout 3 doesn't really allow you to roleplay your character in the same capacity as the prior Fallouts. I never once felt like I could accurately play the role of anything due to the clumsy dialogue and bad gam...

. . . While some of that was true, your story of ducking in and out of cover relies on your personal skill in an FPS. Very COD type of gameplay, with rifle accuracy and evasiveness taking priority over strategy. I haven't actually played Call of Duty (Assuming I am accurately translating the acrony...

Seems to me that there are two basic ways to counter the bulk of the criticism written in the first post. A: If you don't like vats don't use it. The game is perfectly playable without it. In fact, I personally only use vats in emergencies. B: You don't have to spend all your AP in one place. You ca...