Fallout 3 ISN'T at E3

ApTyp · Post by **ApTyp** » Tue May 17, 2005 8:28 pm

Shock! NMA taking more interest in Bethesda's Fallout 3? What, did your massive archive of "leaked" Van Buren screenshots ran out?

Brother None · Post by **Brother None** » Tue May 17, 2005 8:30 pm

ApTyp wrote:Shock! NMA taking more interest in Bethesda's Fallout 3?

It's kind of hard to take interest in a game which is in pre-production and has next-to-no info circulating around it. The more we know the more we cover. It's kind of hard to cover what you don't know, y'know?

ApTyp wrote:What, did your massive archive of "leaked" Van Buren screenshots ran out?

That's funny, by saying "leaked" you seem to be indicating that it's not leaked, which would mean that rather than being leaked we get it straight from the owner. Herve Caen. Eheeheheh.

Or wait, does Feargus own that stuff now?

ApTyp · Post by **ApTyp** » Tue May 17, 2005 8:55 pm

You get +1 points for making a convincing argument to uninformed outsider, and -2 penalty because there are no uninformed outsiders here, thus making you look like an apologist.

Brother None · Post by **Brother None** » Tue May 17, 2005 9:10 pm

Apologist? What am I apologising for? I can't help it if there's nothing to post about Fallout 3. And I'm also not in control of Van Buren stuff, but as far as I know they are simply good that occasionally leak. You seem to disagree with this, but I'm not sure how. Uhm...How?

Nicolai · Post by **Nicolai** » Tue May 17, 2005 9:15 pm

Kharn wrote:they are simply good that occasionally leak.

What?

ApTyp · Post by **ApTyp** » Tue May 17, 2005 9:22 pm

He meant 'goods'. And no, they don't "occasionally leak". More at 11.