Legalise institutionalized sodomy?
- Thor Kaufman
- Mamma's Gang member
- Posts: 5081
- Joined: Mon Dec 16, 2002 11:56 am
- Contact:
You should revise your logic courses, maybe. I neither said anything like that nor does anything imply that.Urizen wrote:lol. funny way to put it.Thor Kaufman wrote:which makes the child immensely happy and content.
anyhows, this has been dealt with already. following your logic, single fathers should be thrown into the snake pit.
Simple put: It's better for a child to have a good mother, nothing more, nothing less.
Arr, the pointlessness
- Urizen
- Vault Hero
- Posts: 1034
- Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 10:55 pm
- Location: London. The pub, not the city
- Contact:
Sorry, I just thought you tried to make a relevant point. My bad.Thor Kaufman wrote:You should revise your logic courses, maybe. I neither said anything like that nor does anything imply that.Urizen wrote:lol. funny way to put it.Thor Kaufman wrote:which makes the child immensely happy and content.
anyhows, this has been dealt with already. following your logic, single fathers should be thrown into the snake pit.
Simple put: It's better for a child to have a good mother, nothing more, nothing less.
Arr, the pointlessness
- Thor Kaufman
- Mamma's Gang member
- Posts: 5081
- Joined: Mon Dec 16, 2002 11:56 am
- Contact:
You think "...single fathers should be thrown into the snake pit." is a relevant point? Sounds reasonable. Besides, all of my points are relevant.Urizen wrote:Sorry, I just thought you tried to make a relevant point. My bad.Thor Kaufman wrote:You should revise your logic courses, maybe. I neither said anything like that nor does anything imply that.Urizen wrote: lol. funny way to put it.
anyhows, this has been dealt with already. following your logic, single fathers should be thrown into the snake pit.
Simple put: It's better for a child to have a good mother, nothing more, nothing less.
Arr, the pointlessness
. . . . . . .