US has a Major Weakness

Carandiru · Post by **Carandiru** » Mon Apr 30, 2007 1:52 am

source:

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0205754/

for other links to this incredible information, i have them on my website:

http://www.uamp.ca/

Redeye · Post by **Redeye** » Mon Apr 30, 2007 4:38 am

Rainbow Bombs, lol

Wolfman Walt · Post by **Wolfman Walt** » Mon Apr 30, 2007 5:45 am

You've yet to link me to a credible source I can read, Carandu inwhich to verify your claims. Give me some DOD declassified papers or something, not a link to IMDB that tells me nothing. Hell, I could just randomly link to some OTHER movie that mentions "Atom bomb" and is called a documentary and say "According to this recently declassified information, the U.S. has secretly planeted a nuclear device disguised to look like an ordinary soldier's head. The only way to tell is the shape resembled a butt plug."

Redeye · Post by **Redeye** » Mon Apr 30, 2007 7:39 am

FAS has some data.

Scroll down a bit.

Wolfman Walt · Post by **Wolfman Walt** » Mon Apr 30, 2007 8:08 am

Thats abit more like it for evidence. It's interesting to see Russia isn't getting as much flack from Carandiarattdjplat though. I'd prefer some info from a slightly less biased source, but it looks good enough to me.

Thor Kaufman · Post by **Thor Kaufman** » Mon Apr 30, 2007 8:20 am

Jeez, get over it, stop trusting empirical evidence and scientific data and start living, start trusting in god

Wolfman Walt · Post by **Wolfman Walt** » Mon Apr 30, 2007 8:47 am

But wouldn't living then entail going to church constantly, since I have to pray in him to gain his trust or something? D=

Thor Kaufman · Post by **Thor Kaufman** » Mon Apr 30, 2007 8:56 am

I dunno but my preach told me it has a lot to do with kneeling down to receive the blood of christ plus a lot of spankings for eternal salvation

T-900 · Post by **T-900** » Mon Apr 30, 2007 9:13 am

Is there any logical reason to have tested so many?

I can't see it... Even for scaring the hell out of other nations, that's about 2300 too many, no?

- Jack

Thor Kaufman · Post by **Thor Kaufman** » Mon Apr 30, 2007 10:01 am

you can never test enough nukes, also you have to make room for new ones

VasikkA · Post by **VasikkA** » Mon Apr 30, 2007 10:59 am

Because of testing, nations with nuclear capacity have the required knowledge to achieve the optimal effects in case they were to use nuclear weapons and to update their nuclear doctrines accordingly. Because nukes have proven to be potent weapons, they haven't been used in smaller war theaters thus saving millions of lives and probably never will be used again.

High altitude nuclear testing has been marginal, to say the least. As for a connection with global warming, I'm highly doubtful. The majority of those 2400 nuclear detonations have been underground tests.

jetbaby · Post by **jetbaby** » Mon Apr 30, 2007 12:07 pm

Would you design and develop a new rifle for your army and then pass it out to hundreds of thousands if not millions of soldiers without ever firing a round through it?

Exact same idea, only with the added benefit of showing off to your enemies' satellites that the MAD doctrine was quite very real and the world really was on the brink for a long time there.

Redeye · Post by **Redeye** » Mon Apr 30, 2007 9:39 pm

Err...

Let's see. There a several generations of nuclear warheads (1950-1990 appx.), each with subtypes- strategic, tactical, small strategic(SLBM warheads), cruise, etc.

Plus during development there might be several possible designs for each warhead.
Plus various safety strategies and fancy things like variable-yield, which adds even more designs.

Plus, you might occaisionally take one bomb out of each batch every 10 years or so and detonate for long-term Quality-Assurance data.

They do that for ICBMs (after taking the warheads off.)

It all adds up to a fuckload of bombs being made and tested.

Bring back the MX!