Duck and Cover

Papirkurv?

ahah cick magnet you're funny, LOL it's not

KDe makes it like *I* want. I'd start a linux discussion but I'm drunk and I lieke it(plus thse guys still use Windows). I still miss Gnome and XFCE but still KDE is cooler.

*drunk shit removed*

Don't make me come over there and corbeille your face. :arrgh:

Geno wrote:ahah cick magnet you're funny, LOL it's not

KDe makes it like *I* want. I'd start a linux discussion but I'm drunk and I lieke it(plus thse guys still use Windows). I still miss Gnome and XFCE but still KDE is cooler.

Rankings of interfaces:
1. KDE
2. XFCE
3. Gnome
4. Mac
5. BeOS
6. OS/2
7. Anything else, including DOS
8. Windows

I wonder if there might be an alternate interpretation of Windows...
sort of like the guys who still play the Combat cartridge on the
Atari 2600.
Sort of.
A badass edgy thing to do. Like white upper middle class educated people
doing heroin in the '90s.

"We back up our files on cds, zip discs, and an external HD."
"Given that we have high speed d/l, we can just restore anything
not backed up in a half hour tops."
"So why not hang ten on the wild side and use Microsloth Archaic
Technology?"
"It's almost as heavy as using a fucking typewriter. And listening
to vinyl. We even drive a 1969 Buick Deluxe. It's a V8!"
"Hey, where'd I put my grease? My muttonchops are sagging!"


badass

KDE isn't that far away from Windows in general. I used to use it and I'm partially retarded.

Yes, but it can be easily configured to be alienating to Windows users. The default looks like Windows.

Im too nerdy to be punk

well linux does seem kinda attractive, but AFAIK I won't be able to play all my games on linux, nor to use lots of software I like. I have hundreds of games. How many of them would linux support?

1.

Koki wrote:1.

*scowls*

OPTIMIST.

Nicolai wrote:Oh my, how horrible.

26:36? That's one fucked up clock.

Quidel wrote:Star Trek _is_ classy. It's like an instant chick magnet.

Geno wrote:Rankings of interfaces:
1. KDE
2. XFCE
3. Gnome
4. Mac
5. BeOS
6. OS/2
7. Anything else, including DOS
8. Windows

Ban Geno.

In Norway, there are 48 hours a day.

S4ur0n27 wrote:In Norway, there are 48 hours a day.

In Soviet Russia, you don't drink vodka.
vodka drinks YOU!.

Well, if KDE works for you, that's good. I have never seen the point in debating interfaces or OS's, most people are using either for a good reason.
If someone wants to get into Linux, they'll learn about it and try it out, forcing opinions on people never works. I used to be big into telling everyone and their dog to use Linux, but it just resulted in bitterness. For example, saying Kubuntu is a beginner's toy OS wouldn't sway your opinion

@PiP: Linux has a few native ports, like NWN, UT2004, etc. For everything else, you need to emulate with either Wine, Cedega, DOSBox, VMWare, Qemu, etc. I use Wine for things like Diablo 2 and a few older games. In reality, anything new and spicy that uses Direct X normally doesn't emulate too well. Personally I dual boot, Windows XP for games (almost setup like a console platform), and Linux for everything else.

Yeah, I wouldn't want to start an interface war. I was drunk when I posted that, I was feeling like it but I usually about Linux/free software to people who aren't interested.

I don't have Windows anymore(I use VMWare for school, though) and I play most of my games under Cedega. If it doesn't work, I play on another computer. I don't play enough games to warrant dual-boot.

"Personally I dual boot, Windows XP for games (almost setup like a console platform), and Linux for everything else."

I've tried that twice before in the past (RH 7 & RH 8, I think, maybe RH 9 too). The problem is I never get around to the "everything else" part because Windows is so easy to use and lacks most the hardware compatibility issues. The security issues with Windows are very real but also very easy to keep up with (so far). I know all the problems in Linux (hardware, lack of easy-to-use software) can be surmounted with effort, but the "why bother" feeling always kicks in at some point. That said, I'm going to install Fedora Core 4 (dual XP boot) within the next week after I decide some hard drive things.

@baby arm: Yeah, I could definately see that, one of my friends has a similar problem. If XP is working though, you may as well just stick with that, it has matured enough anyways to be close to Linux from a technical standpoint (SP2 + smart install = secure enough box). Even using some open source programs on Windows seems fine enough for most people (stuff like Firefox, Azureus, the GIMP, etc.)
I don't use Linux for it's technical merits though, it's because many minor things bug me about XP, and it eventually added up enough that I decided to switch. Then all the options and freedom in Linux kept me there. Normally a case of use what's best though.
I personally like the option of recompiling my kernel, hand compiling each software program, a powerful command line, customization out the wazoo, etc. Even minor stuff like virtual workspaces and window layering. I know that isn't for everyone though, not by a long stretch.
Even using a "friendly" distro normally ends up being a Windows-like clone, which sort of defeats the purpose.
Interesting discussion though.

Quidel wrote:In reality, anything new and spicy that uses Direct X normally doesn't emulate too well

that's the point.

I use Wine for things like Diablo 2

wtf are you exactly doing here at these boards, mindless-hack-n-slash boy?

PiP wrote:wtf are you exactly doing here at these boards, mindless-hack-n-slash boy?

Diablo 2 is just one of the many games I play, it's mainly installed to keep my old characters from expiring. Besides, I use a seperate 10 year old laptop for "real" games like Wasteland and Fallout.
And I'm on these boards to post my desktop and talk Linux

nerd