Duck and Cover

I had a crazy trip last week about me eating my own head, and some other weird shit too.

<deleted> And I think I'm about to have a morning aftershock.

look in a mirror. yell out as loud as you can : 'look. it's only inside my head! and a little bit outside, but only a little bit!!! aaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!! aaaaaaaa-aaaa-aaa!!! please!!! not my nostriiils!!! aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaarrrrrrggh!!!!'. works. every time. guaranteed.

Camel Wides or Filterless and Jack Daniels ftw!

Jack Daniels is teh awesome!
But I prefer hash or psilocybin... :trippin':

fuckfaces, Jack Daniels is awful, doesn't taste like good whiskey should, tastes foul ol' chemicals or summit.

For a good whiskey you should go for an islay, prefferably one with smoke in its taste. And stay away from them blended ones, they are usually not worth it.
Go for a single malt, aged in a oak barrel.

Doesn't <i>have</i> to be an islay though.
Talisker is a good example of non islay whiskey with excellent flavour.
And then there's McLeod's single malt, try their most smokey, and you're all good.

Mismatch wrote:fuckfaces, Jack Daniels is awful, doesn't taste like good whiskey should, tastes foul ol' chemicals or summit.

For a good whiskey you should go for an islay, prefferably one with smoke in its taste. And stay away from them blended ones, they are usually not worth it.
Go for a single malt, aged in a oak barrel.

Doesn't <i>have</i> to be an islay though.
Talisker is a good example of non islay whiskey with excellent flavour.
And then there's McLeod's single malt, try their most smokey, and you're all good.

After half a bottle you won't notice the difference. I love cheap alcohol.

Mismatch wrote:fuckfaces, Jack Daniels is awful, doesn't taste like good whiskey should, tastes foul ol' chemicals or summit.

For a good whiskey you should go for an islay, prefferably one with smoke in its taste. And stay away from them blended ones, they are usually not worth it.
Go for a single malt, aged in a oak barrel.

Doesn't <i>have</i> to be an islay though.
Talisker is a good example of non islay whiskey with excellent flavour.
And then there's McLeod's single malt, try their most smokey, and you're all good.

Jack Daniel's is probably the best whiskey available in commercial quantities. I.e. like Absolut from your home country. It's not good, but if I go to a club I get that over any one of their other vodka's.

Just yesterday, I had a rum coke and a whiskey coke in a club. The bitch decided not to ask me before she used a Limited Edition JD and a 20 year old Havana for them. Beefed the prices up quite a bit as well.

Mismatch wrote:For a good whiskey you should go for an islay, prefferably one with smoke in its taste. And stay away from them blended ones, they are usually not worth it.
Go for a single malt, aged in a oak barrel.

You just haven't tried the right blends. Chivas Regal 12 year-old shuts up every single-malt snob I've encountered.

And yes, I know all Europeans are supposed to hate Jack Daniel's, but seriously. It's not bad.

I've started drinking Jameson instead, it's got the JD taste but without all the worst parts, and it's only a little bit more expensive.

I despise Bushmills.

Why do they charge so much for fermented manure?


Beer is where it's at.

Frank Zappa (RIP) pointed out in his book that "winos don't march,
whiskey guys might want to kill their wives..."
But beer has something in it that arouses the martial spirit.

:patriot:

beer is good, red wine is tastier, though

After half a bottle you won't notice the difference. I love cheap alcohol.

And yes, I know all Europeans are supposed to hate Jack Daniel's, but seriously. It's not bad.

For plain drunkeness, it is okay, but if one drink for the taste, one'd be best off without it.
Getting drunk on the nice brands is just a waste of moneh.

Jack Daniel's is probably the best whiskey available in commercial quantities.

I beg to differ, a bottle of McLeod's goes for about $30 in sweden, which prolly means $15 in a country with decent alcohol tax.


The real issue with Jack daniels is that it doesn't taste whiskey, much in the same way budweiser doesn't taste beer.
I can drink any of em, but if I want whiskey I don't buy JD, because it just doesnt taste like it. And if I want beer I don't get budweiser, I go for one of the czech brands.

I bought a bottle of JD for about &#8364;15 at Schiphol Airport in Holland six
days ago and its already gone..
Gets you drunk; yes. Comparable to single-malt; Nope!

Of course it's not comparable, it's not scotch.

Sex

I've found a vodka that may force me to rethink my staunch anti-vodka stance. Iceberg

Redeye wrote:Spiders on Drugs

Muahahahaahahahahahahaahhahaah! Where's that from?

Cthulhu wrote:

Redeye wrote:Spiders on Drugs

Muahahahaahahahahahahaahhahaah! Where's that from?

Omg GOLD!
hahaha

Subhuman wrote:

Mismatch wrote:For a good whiskey you should go for an islay, prefferably one with smoke in its taste. And stay away from them blended ones, they are usually not worth it.
Go for a single malt, aged in a oak barrel.

You just haven't tried the right blends. Chivas Regal 12 year-old shuts up every single-malt snob I've encountered.

And yes, I know all Europeans are supposed to hate Jack Daniel's, but seriously. It's not bad.

The irony is a large portion of old barrels fro JD and other american whiskey makers goes to europe, and makes scottch.


Put that in your pipe and smoke it, god damn euro trash.

Mismatch, that means that oak barrel once held Jack :D

Subhuman, ignore the eurotrash comment, you have good taste at least.