Page 1 of 2
I wonder that in F3 ...
Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2003 5:36 pm
by Obsydian
I wonder that in comming Fallout 3 will be place for ... clans ? if there will be a multiplayer that could be a good idea - what i have on my mind ? for egzample: guilds and something more, maybe buying some buildings and fight for areas to keep control of some clans ... what do You think about that ? (on Diablo that colud be possible but Blizzard go out from this idead)
P.S. Sory for my english ...
Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2003 6:54 pm
by Jimmyjay86
Uggh, no please.
Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2003 7:03 pm
by atoga
No, though I'm sure if there's multiplayer, clans will grow like a bad fungus and make things worse.
Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2003 8:45 pm
by Obsydian
Yes its true like it was with FT. But why You thing it is bad ?
Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2003 9:46 pm
by atoga
Well first of all, multiplayer can only be a bad feature, unless it is entirely mindless (ie. a boxing ring, a casino or bar, whatever) and disjointed from the story. However, I don't see this happening - something as hyped as F3 is likely to deserve a more epic treatment, which in turn hurts the story and takes off time spent improving SP gameplay instead implementing MP functions.
On top of that, clans tend to make multiplayer elitist and stupid.
Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2003 11:57 pm
by Killzig
so wrong. overwhelming pain... eyes bursting.... make it stop. ARGH
Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2003 1:49 am
by SuperH
Clan multiplayer in fallout could only ever be accomplished well if people could all have different katanas with user definable skins that would make it oh so very easy to tell the different clans apart.
"HYE UR BLAD ISS BLAK LIEK MIEn GET UR OWN MFING SKINN!!!11"
"NO DUD I MAD TIHS 1ST IM GUNNA FING PWN U I N 4 FOERCE DUAL!!!!!11111111111121!"
"K MFING NUB UR GONG DOWNN!!! ~(-';<"
Wow, that's pretty cool...
Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2003 2:14 am
by Bloodgeon11
Please, please, please no...
Multi-player fallout can only be a turn for the worse, and clans foster resentment.
Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2003 6:21 pm
by Dramuck
I agree with the above comments, Fallout the RPG is not a multi-player compatible game (I don’t rate Fallout: Tactics at all).
Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2003 7:44 pm
by Dan
Internet clans are among the stupidest things EVAR.
Fallout multyplayer clans?
*sigh*
Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2003 10:50 pm
by Obsydian
Yes i think the same way as You but i was courious Your's opinion about that
. In my forum (
http://shamo.gr-online.pl/forum/) we have many controversions about that
.
Posted: Wed Jul 16, 2003 12:05 am
by Frondz
I don't think multiplayer done like the Baldurs Gate series would be all that bad for Fallout 3.
Ie. One player is the protaganist (Bhaalspawn in BG1, 'Chosen One' or whatever the main character is in F3) and the other characters (whoever else plays with the host) are childhood friends, companions, or just along for the ride.
They'd be the equivilant of an NPC, nothing more. I doubt that'd take much away from the development, regardless.
Posted: Wed Jul 16, 2003 1:05 am
by Strap
if they really do want to make a multiplayer fallout, finish F3 first, and then make a spinoff by the name of FOOL, just dont ruin F3 while your at it...
Posted: Wed Jul 16, 2003 6:38 am
by Ripper
Strapon2 wrote:if they really do want to make a multiplayer fallout, finish F3 first, and then make a spinoff by the name of FOOL, just dont ruin F3 while your at it...
hell, yeah.
anyway, any multiplayer in FO is bound to be crappy if not POS.
:x
Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2003 8:47 pm
by Obsydian
I hope so that this cooperative dont ruin averything ... maybe not ?
Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2003 9:18 pm
by Hokkien
OOOH I'm ALL UP FOR a Fallout MMORPG with TACTICAL COMBATS BETWEEN PC PlaYER CLANS.
OF course it has to be in 1st person view, well Maybe just third, you know where you hover over the top of the head of the gyus... like KOTOR. COOL EH?
I cood be a Raider in the WASTES. Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee./1111 Join theEnclane
Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2003 11:22 pm
by atoga
I do hope you're being sarcastic. Sadly, however, I cannot tell.
Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2003 12:04 am
by Hokkien
^I was.
(I also am a purist).
Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2003 12:57 am
by airsoft guy
I don't think it should have any multiplayer elements, they're pointless, all it does is turn a perfectlty good RPG into gayass top down death-match greatest fuck-up ever. If you could somehow get people to play by the rules and actually do the game instead of fucking around and shooting everyone and everything in sight, you know that's what's going to happen, as cool as it would be to have a Fallout MMORPG we all know that it would suck cock like no other because we'd get cheaters and n00bs up the ass who spiff their character up to Jesus status, or kill everyone who looks at the cockeyed. Besides, Fallout needs a story, what the fuck kind of stories are there in MMORPG's? I've seen them and it dosn't seem like a lot, it's more of a simulation than a RPG, the Sims with guns and lightsabres it seems.
Posted: Sat Aug 23, 2003 1:13 am
by Garf
Sounds like what you're hinting at is an MMORPG of Fallout..
Oh god no.