Experience

Mapping & modding Fallout Tactics and reviewing maps thereof.
Post Reply

How would you prefer that characters improve?

Other than normal leveling, by better weapons and armor.
2
50%
More Hit Points via other means than leveling. Defense bypassers are nasty, and I hate loading due to "luck".
0
No votes
I would appreciate more character tweaking. How about specialized armor and weapons I can upgrade however I wish?
1
25%
I would like for my character to get promoted after level 50. This way I could build them up again and have an even stronger character.
0
No votes
All of the above.
1
25%
 
Total votes: 4

User avatar
PaladinHeart
Strider
Strider
Posts: 747
Joined: Sun Feb 02, 2003 5:28 am
Contact:

Experience

Post by PaladinHeart »

Is 50 levels enough? In a normal RPG, you can go up to level 99, sometimes higher. In FOT there aren't that many options to improve your character with a measly 50 levels (a perk every 3 levels = 16 Perks). You might consider it a lot, but it might not be enough for a lengthy campaign. What method would you consider best for improving characters?

With option 4, keep in mind that your old character would die (so you could get your stuff), and the new character would start at level 1, but with better stats than the old one. You would also be given the opportunity to redistribute skill points and perks with your new levels, and would start out with better traits.
User avatar
Jimmyjay86
Hero of the Glowing Lands
Hero of the Glowing Lands
Posts: 2102
Joined: Thu Apr 18, 2002 4:02 am
Location: Wisconsin
Contact:

Post by Jimmyjay86 »

There are a lot of design decisions involved in this. If you get too strong then unless simple raiders become more difficult they won't pose much of a challenge later on. I think enemies should also get more dangerous through combat. There should be a happy medium as you progress through a campaign and I think FOT did a good job of presenting you with progressively more difficult situations.
User avatar
OnTheBounce
TANSTAAFL
TANSTAAFL
Posts: 2257
Joined: Thu Apr 18, 2002 8:39 am
Location: Grafenwoehr, Oberpfalz, Bayern, Deutschland
Contact:

Post by OnTheBounce »

Personally, I've never found high-level games to be much fun. I played AD&D for years and years, and yet we always retired characters somewhere between 8th and 12th level. In FO I'd say that the playable window extend out to roughly 24th level, but still, I couldn't imagine playing to anywhere near 50th, let alone 99th. (Note that the original FO only went up to Lvl 21.)

You see, in order to give high-level characters a challenge, you have to throw high-level things at them. So where your 2nd level squad is challenged by a handful of Raiders with a few pipe rifles and some spears, the 25th level squad needs a dozen Behemoth 'Bots to make them even break a sweat. So the whole thing just becomes things w/gobs of HPs getting hit for massive amounts of damage and...well, just give me a couple of Ghouls to root out of a building. Something where my ability to survive is determined more by my ability to think rather than what equipment I have and everyone isn't hitting every damned time they shoot.

My two cents,

OTB
"On the bounce, you apes! Do you wanna live forever?!"
User avatar
Forty-six & Two
Wandering Hero
Wandering Hero
Posts: 1109
Joined: Thu May 09, 2002 11:52 pm
Location: Out of sight
Contact:

Post by Forty-six & Two »

OnTheBounce wrote:...well, just give me a couple of Ghouls to root out of a building. Something where my ability to survive is determined more by my ability to think rather than what equipment I have and everyone isn't hitting every damned time they shoot.OTB
Im with OTB on this one. Low level char are no doubt the best fun since tactics and strategy and the do-with-what-you-have becomes more important and ultimately "Fallouty" which I hope is what were aiming for here =).
Image
Post Reply