Czech buys JAS-39 instead of F-16

Home of discussion, generally. If it doesn't go in any of the other forums, post it in here.
User avatar
Ooe
Vault Dweller
Vault Dweller
Posts: 119
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2003 8:57 am
Location: City 17 (Guess what game?)
Contact:

Czech buys JAS-39 instead of F-16

Post by Ooe »

Today it was announced that the Czech have made up their minds about buying airplanes. Though they received generous offers from USA about the F-16 they choosed the Swedish-British JAS-39 Gripen (Griffon).

Well, what can we say instead of: Good choice!
User avatar
trythebill
Vault Veteran
Vault Veteran
Posts: 259
Joined: Tue May 27, 2003 10:22 pm

Post by trythebill »

i'm not really up to date on my euro-fighters but why is the JAS39 better than the F16?

i assume in large part this must be due to the greater avionics advancements and inherent instability in the JAS39 which allows for better maunverability.
"I drink a great deal. I sleep a little, and I smoke cigar after cigar. That is why I am in two-hundred-percent form."
-- Winston Churchill
User avatar
Jimmyjay86
Hero of the Glowing Lands
Hero of the Glowing Lands
Posts: 2102
Joined: Thu Apr 18, 2002 4:02 am
Location: Wisconsin
Contact:

Post by Jimmyjay86 »

F16 seems old school and outdated.
User avatar
S4ur0n27
Mamma's Gang member
Mamma's Gang member
Posts: 15172
Joined: Sat Jun 01, 2002 10:14 am
Contact:

Post by S4ur0n27 »

Fear teh Czech!
User avatar
MurPHy
Strider Elite
Strider Elite
Posts: 943
Joined: Tue May 21, 2002 2:20 am
Location: South Jersey

Post by MurPHy »

My Great Grandfather would be proud. He is the one who brought my Czech clan to the great America back before WWI (sometime around 1900).
DAC Server? wrote:0 HTTP/1.1 200 OK Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 15:13:03 GMT Server: Apache/1.3.29 (Unix) mod_auth_passthrough/1.8 mod_log_bytes/1.2 mod_bwlimited/1.2 PHP/4.3.4 FrontPage/5.0.2.2634 mod_ssl/2.8.16 OpenSSL/0.9.6b X-Powered-By: PHP/4.3.4 Cache-Control: private, pre-check=0, post-check=0, max-age=0 Expires: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 15:13:03 GMT Last-Modified: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 15:13:03 GMT Keep-Alive: timeout=8 Connection: Keep-Alive Transfer-Encoding: chunked Content-Type: text/html 1654
And what the hell is this? I found it in the Topic Review area. Well, it tels me that the DAC server runs Linux. Good choice of an OS!
User avatar
DJ Slamák
Vault Elite
Vault Elite
Posts: 393
Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2002 11:17 pm
Location: Prague, Czech Republic
Contact:

Post by DJ Slamák »

Jimmyjay86 wrote:F16 seems old school and outdated.
Yeah, pretty much, I guess.
To boot, the F-16s offered by the Netherlands, the US and Belgium and the FA-18s from Canada would have been used, whereas Sweden is offering brand spanking new crap for the same price.

Of course a part of the price is an unofficial promise that we'll buy fighters from Sweden when the time comes (this isn't a buy, we're just renting the fighters), but with the outright pitiful state our army's budget is in, it's mutually beneficial - the Swedes get easy $$$ (or more appropriately, €€€) and we get new toys to crash instead of used ones...

It seems the Americans kinda fucked it too, with last-minute lobbying. Seems it ticked the gov't off rather than convinced them :)
User avatar
RawonaM
Vault Scion
Vault Scion
Posts: 189
Joined: Sun May 19, 2002 5:01 pm
Location: Hellsinki, Finland

Post by RawonaM »

Of course a part of the price is an unofficial promise that we'll buy fighters from Sweden when the time comes (this isn't a buy, we're just renting the fighters), but with the outright pitiful state our army's budget is in, it's mutually beneficial - the Swedes get easy $$$ (or more appropriately, €€€) and we get new toys to crash instead of used ones...
I think they still use krona's... :?
Long Live Rock n' Roll
chrisbeddoes
Respected
Respected
Posts: 88
Joined: Sat May 17, 2003 4:20 pm

Post by chrisbeddoes »

Basically it is not what is better by who you trust.

Because these fighters need massive maintainace if used in war time if someone stoped selling you supplies you could not use them after 48 hours.

So it comes to who you trust the most.
User avatar
Ooe
Vault Dweller
Vault Dweller
Posts: 119
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2003 8:57 am
Location: City 17 (Guess what game?)
Contact:

Post by Ooe »

Someone wrote: I think they still use krona's... :?
Thats CROWNS for you.
User avatar
RawonaM
Vault Scion
Vault Scion
Posts: 189
Joined: Sun May 19, 2002 5:01 pm
Location: Hellsinki, Finland

Post by RawonaM »

Well actually they are KRUUNU's for me. But you are right that they are crowns in english. Forgive me for that, if you may ;)
Long Live Rock n' Roll
Turan
Regular
Regular
Posts: 52
Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2003 12:45 am

Post by Turan »

Interesting choice. Why not wait for the JSF to hit the market-to expensive?
User avatar
iohkus
Desert Strider
Desert Strider
Posts: 830
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2003 8:18 am
Location: canadialand
Contact:

Post by iohkus »

that looks like the mig 41.
bey.
User avatar
Menno
Wanderer
Wanderer
Posts: 400
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 9:13 pm
Location: New York

Post by Menno »

chrisbeddoes wrote:Basically it is not what is better by who you trust.

Because these fighters need massive maintainace if used in war time if someone stoped selling you supplies you could not use them after 48 hours.

So it comes to who you trust the most.
I don't think that had anything to do with it in this instance, though you're right that something like what you said does play a part in it. You usually don't worry about them to stop selling supplies unless you plan on going to war with them in the near future. So I don't think trust really had nothing to do with it here.

The JAS-39 is an excellent lightweight aircraft, and compared to the F-16 is far newer (I think the first F-16 entered service in 1979). Though I hear the upgraded F-16's (Block 60?) are really good, don't know if those were offered with this contract though. The F-16 is basically the AK-47 of aircraft. I'm surprised they didn't go for the F-16 contract though, since you can get alot more F-16's (basically an entire Air Force package) than you can Gripens. The JAS-39 is perfect for their needs though, so they made a good choice.

But remember, pilots make the aircraft, not the other way around [look at the British, who are still using Harriers for both air-to-air and ground support]. So as long as the Czech's give their pilots plenty of flight time, they'll be in great shape.
Kashluk

Post by Kashluk »

Aren't the Czechs having same kind of trouble keeping their air force pilots on duty as Finns? At least here, the commercial airline companies are hiring almost directly from the air force! They get paid better and the job has nearly zero risks compared to military flights 8-o

This might become the ugly reality in your country as well, now that you've spent so much money on these new fighters. It happened here, when we got those F-18 Hornets...
User avatar
DJ Slamák
Vault Elite
Vault Elite
Posts: 393
Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2002 11:17 pm
Location: Prague, Czech Republic
Contact:

Post by DJ Slamák »

Aren't the Czechs having same kind of trouble keeping their air force pilots on duty as Finns? At least here, the commercial airline companies are hiring almost directly from the air force! They get paid better and the job has nearly zero risks compared to military flights 8-o

I'm not sure how widespread it is, but such people exist. Add to that the L-159s, practice planes that are getting obsolete, crashing, and killing pilots. Or at least it¨s what the media capitalized on in the recent years.
Interesting choice. Why not wait for the JSF to hit the market-to expensive?
Probably. The state budget is rigged in a way that there's never enough money for anything. :)
I think they still use krona's...
Oops... :oops:
Kashluk

Post by Kashluk »

But you'll get to be a part of our grand grand union next spring, don't ya? :) REJOICE. Not sure if they'll let you join the EMU though, but it's still all rejoice.
User avatar
trythebill
Vault Veteran
Vault Veteran
Posts: 259
Joined: Tue May 27, 2003 10:22 pm

Post by trythebill »

the czech president is a hardass, they need to let him in the EU just for kicks.
"I drink a great deal. I sleep a little, and I smoke cigar after cigar. That is why I am in two-hundred-percent form."
-- Winston Churchill
User avatar
Mihail
Regular
Regular
Posts: 61
Joined: Mon Feb 24, 2003 2:40 am
Location: st. petersburg, ru
Contact:

Post by Mihail »

Menno wrote:
chrisbeddoes wrote:Basically it is not what is better by who you trust.

Because these fighters need massive maintainace if used in war time if someone stoped selling you supplies you could not use them after 48 hours.

So it comes to who you trust the most.
I don't think that had anything to do with it in this instance, though you're right that something like what you said does play a part in it. You usually don't worry about them to stop selling supplies unless you plan on going to war with them in the near future. So I don't think trust really had nothing to do with it here.

The JAS-39 is an excellent lightweight aircraft, and compared to the F-16 is far newer (I think the first F-16 entered service in 1979). Though I hear the upgraded F-16's (Block 60?) are really good, don't know if those were offered with this contract though. The F-16 is basically the AK-47 of aircraft. I'm surprised they didn't go for the F-16 contract though, since you can get alot more F-16's (basically an entire Air Force package) than you can Gripens. The JAS-39 is perfect for their needs though, so they made a good choice.

But remember, pilots make the aircraft, not the other way around [look at the British, who are still using Harriers for both air-to-air and ground support]. So as long as the Czech's give their pilots plenty of flight time, they'll be in great shape.

not really the Ak of modern jets for sure is the MiG-29, considering that it's very basic but very advance meaning simple repairs, and not as dependant on computers as the F-16, also since it's only a single engine jet, flame outs can be a problem, not trying to bash the F-16 or anything mind you
Image
User avatar
Menno
Wanderer
Wanderer
Posts: 400
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 9:13 pm
Location: New York

Post by Menno »

Mihail wrote:
Menno wrote:
chrisbeddoes wrote:Basically it is not what is better by who you trust.

Because these fighters need massive maintainace if used in war time if someone stoped selling you supplies you could not use them after 48 hours.

So it comes to who you trust the most.
I don't think that had anything to do with it in this instance, though you're right that something like what you said does play a part in it. You usually don't worry about them to stop selling supplies unless you plan on going to war with them in the near future. So I don't think trust really had nothing to do with it here.

The JAS-39 is an excellent lightweight aircraft, and compared to the F-16 is far newer (I think the first F-16 entered service in 1979). Though I hear the upgraded F-16's (Block 60?) are really good, don't know if those were offered with this contract though. The F-16 is basically the AK-47 of aircraft. I'm surprised they didn't go for the F-16 contract though, since you can get alot more F-16's (basically an entire Air Force package) than you can Gripens. The JAS-39 is perfect for their needs though, so they made a good choice.

But remember, pilots make the aircraft, not the other way around [look at the British, who are still using Harriers for both air-to-air and ground support]. So as long as the Czech's give their pilots plenty of flight time, they'll be in great shape.

not really the Ak of modern jets for sure is the MiG-29, considering that it's very basic but very advance meaning simple repairs, and not as dependant on computers as the F-16, also since it's only a single engine jet, flame outs can be a problem, not trying to bash the F-16 or anything mind you
You're right, my mistake. I meant to say it was basically the AK-47 of NATO.
User avatar
DJ Slamák
Vault Elite
Vault Elite
Posts: 393
Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2002 11:17 pm
Location: Prague, Czech Republic
Contact:

Post by DJ Slamák »

trythebill wrote:the czech president is a hardass, they need to let him in the EU just for kicks.
You do mean the current one, Václav Klaus? I don't know about the "hard" part, but he sure is an ass. :)
Post Reply