Game Informer says FOBOS is... decent?!

JohnPnP · Post by **JohnPnP** » Thu Jan 22, 2004 7:34 pm

Apparently Game Informer in their february issue gave FOBOS an 8. The article reads that it will bring in old and new fans alike.
What bullshit.

abnathapryde · Post by **abnathapryde** » Thu Jan 22, 2004 8:36 pm

Wolfman Walt · Post by **Wolfman Walt** » Thu Jan 22, 2004 8:39 pm

I give you a 2 out of 10

Mad Max RW · Post by **Mad Max RW** » Thu Jan 22, 2004 10:27 pm

At least include a link and maybe some quotes. Sheesh.

Killzig · Post by **Killzig** » Thu Jan 22, 2004 10:49 pm

Mad Max RW wrote:At least include a link and maybe some quotes. Sheesh.

i never really quite figured what we should do with rejected news bits? figure we should just leave them here?

JohnPnP · Post by **JohnPnP** » Thu Jan 22, 2004 11:04 pm

Well, I couldn't get the damn linkage to work
It should be on www.gameinformer.com somewhere.

Mad Max RW · Post by **Mad Max RW** » Thu Jan 22, 2004 11:06 pm

I used to toss them in whatever forum topic it covered. Something related to FOBOS went to the FOBOS forum. Or another FO3 petition went to the FO3 forum. But that was rare.

Franz Schubert · Post by **Franz Schubert** » Fri Jan 23, 2004 6:43 am

abnathapryde wrote:
JohnPnP wrote:Apparently Game Informer in their february issue gave FOBOS an 8. The article reads that it will bring in old and new fans alike.
What bullshit.

Gotta agree with GI myself, that's the rating I would give BOS...

Yeah I'd give it an 8/100 also.

Foldy · Post by **Foldy** » Sat Jan 24, 2004 1:49 am

I give it the standard rating received by poorly designed, disposable garbage.

MurPHy · Post by **MurPHy** » Fri Jan 30, 2004 4:24 pm

I give it the standard rating received by poorly designed, disposable garbage.

What, the burn rating? As in, how good it burns after you soak it in gasoline and toss your zippo at it? On that scale, I give it a 4/10. Damn plastic!

Insane-Lark · Post by **Insane-Lark** » Fri Jan 30, 2004 6:57 pm

No Sir, I don't like it.
On a scale of 1-10 a 2 or 3 is about right & only that high because there is apparently a game in the box.

Spook334 · Post by **Spook334** » Fri Feb 06, 2004 9:16 pm

I think people here are unrealistic.

On a scale of 10 you usualy only rent games below 9 (and then only buy it if you REALY like it).
And if it is 6 or below you usualy don't even rent it (unless you have a serious need for punishment).

A realistic review probably should be about 5. And that only because that any abuse of the FO name have been disregarded in favour of the game.

So it's a don't buy or rent, but if somebody do actualy play it it will actualy work.....................somewhat.

Canis Lupus · Post by **Canis Lupus** » Sat Feb 07, 2004 1:13 am

Jesus friggin' Christ. Regardless of the number it gets out of ten, it still friggin' sucks. Case closed.

Vault Dweller · Post by **Vault Dweller** » Mon Feb 09, 2004 4:44 pm

Yea, they all have that 'Expert Excrement Expeditor' perk. And I use that old 'Don-t-Touch-Shit-Cause-It-Stinks' attitude to FOBOS. Pity that there are people that rate things too low (like my teachers) or too high.
OBJECTIVITY!!!

Duck and Cover

Game Informer says FOBOS is... decent?!

Game Informer says FOBOS is... decent?!

Re: Game Informer says FOBOS is... decent?!

Re: Game Informer says FOBOS is... decent?!