OK then, I'll buy a game with the hope it gets better? Right.
And screw you with the aestethic powerhouse. I play ugly games as well, hell I still play old FFs. And I'm a hard defender of the old FO 2D graphics.
I just said that Neocron had nothing real good about it, plus the graphic sucks.
So, bad content + bad graphic = SHIT
Neocron: Beyond the Dome of York.
Are you in the closed DoY development beta?s4ur0n27 wrote:OK then, I'll buy a game with the hope it gets better? Right.
And screw you with the aestethic powerhouse. I play ugly games as well, hell I still play old FFs. And I'm a hard defender of the old FO 2D graphics.
I just said that Neocron had nothing real good about it, plus the graphic sucks.
So, bad content + bad graphic = SHIT
Because surely, you can't say the expansion and game are shit if you're not playing it.
I'm not trying to convince you to play it.s4ur0n27 wrote:The game is shit, I played it, now shut the fuck up. Stop trying to convience me to play a bad game.
Notice I never said DoY was bad too.
I'm putting counterpoints to your "hurr hurr game is suk" stance. If that works you up, I'm sorry.
Anyway, just because you don't like the game doesn't mean the game is shit - a better way to put it would be "I think the game is shit"... Or perhaps "I think this game is a complete and utter waste of life" which would both roughly equate to "This game did not have what I was looking for in a game". As you mentioned, you like games which others might not like; as such other gamers are entitled to at least an UNBIASED set of information...
If that is unavailable, they should at least be able to see both camps, eh?
Lastly, I hardly think playing the Beta 2 'demo' constitutes playing the game.
