I can't give you an exact percentage of course, but most of these homeless were drug addicts who lost their jobs and families because of their addiction. Was it their choice to become homeless? No, you're right about that. But it was their actions that lead them to that point, and they ultimately have to bare responsibility for their own actions.Kashluk wrote:One does not necessarily become homeless either because of his own choice, remember that.
A few years ago in NYC under Mayor Giuliani, there was a program in place that pressured jobs to the homeless and able-bodied welfare recipients in exchange for the reduction of benefits they'd receive [as well as providing drug rehibilitation if needed]. The New York Civil Liberties Union [NYCLU] stepped in and decried the program, stating that the work the homeless and welfare recipients were receiving was "demeaning" [as opposed to what, sleeping on the streets?]. Granted, they were assigned "dirty" jobs, such as cleaning subways and other public buildings; but these are after all JOBS. No one was forcing them to keep them forever; just long enough to get them back on their feet and no longer be a burden upon NYC financially. Instead what ended up happening is the NYCLU and other civil activist organizations were sucessful so that the program couldn't force them to work. Giuliani's tough love policy of "either work or lose your benefits" was instead rolled back and now was just an option to a recipient instead of the rule. So what ends up happening? Why should a homeless and/or welfare recipient work when they recieve their benefits anyway?
Answer: They didn't work.
As long as the homeless continue to avoid work, and civil liberty unions continue to make excuses for them, their plight will continue.
So basically I feel more pity for the illegal immigrants than I do the legal residents; because they at least come here to try and better their lives and perhaps make a contribution instead of just burdening everyone else.