Revolution In Iran?
-
- Scarf-wearing n00b
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2004 12:24 am
Revolution In Iran?
http://www.activistchat.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=1424
Will it just be subdued or will it continue?
Will it just be subdued or will it continue?
There as been a struggle between moderates and hardliners for some time now. The scam that where the elections and the general suckiness of the strict islamism that the hardliners enforce has put a large part of the population on the side of the moderates. I think it may weaken the hardliners position but it will not generate a generalized revolution yet. And then again you never know.
Carpe jugulum.
- Walks with the Snails
- Vault Dweller
- Posts: 127
- Joined: Wed May 22, 2002 2:34 am
No, it would not. Iranians are alot more intellegent then Arabs, as they are not the ones who have not had self rule sense the Ayyubids. I think that, if anything, every nation in the area would be willing to help. The Pakistanis because thier Baluchi cousins are hated, and Pakistan is a secular Sunni state, the Azeri because the Azeri/Turkmen population of Iran is about 26%, the Turks because they are the antipathy of everything Iran stands for, the Syrians because the Arabs hate the Iranians.Grey Fil wrote:It would probably unite everybody around the hardliners.
Also, Iranians tend to be better eductated, speak more languages and generally like America more then any nation outside of Poland. This is not Iraq, we have never betrayed the Iranians.
I'd personally have invaded Iran before Iraq- less retaliation from the Arab street as they hate the Iranians as much, maybe more then they hate us, a population screaming for secular democracy as well as being extremely well educated. In other words, everything Iraq is not.
-
- Scarf-wearing n00b
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2004 12:24 am
Well armed means nothing outside of Africa or South East asia (unless it started in one of the larger cities, like Tehran itself or Ishfahan). For every thousand Kalishnikovs or M-4s these guys have, the Ayattholas will have enough WMD, airpower and artillery to silence them and thier city. Best I can hope for is an Attaturk like Army-based yet Democratic revolution.KrokGloken wrote:If the Iranian people were well armed, revolution would be easy.
About seventy-five percent of the population is under twenty-five. Most of those are angry, beaten students wanting some payback.
- InvisibleMonkey
- Vault Elite
- Posts: 381
- Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2003 3:34 pm
- Location: Turn around.
- Contact:
- Mandalorian FaLLouT GoD
- Hero of the Desert
- Posts: 1741
- Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2002 7:50 am
- Location: Legitimate Businessmen's Social Club
i agree. the whole of middle east, including everything surrounding, should put made into a nuclear wasteland so we can throw our garbage there.InvisibleMonkey wrote:The Middle East needs to be nuked. It's the shit hole of the world.
Blargh wrote:While the way in which the stance is made could be done with at least a pretense of civility - being far more conducive to others actually paying attention than copious swearing - it just wouldn't be Mandy otherwise.
S4ur0n27 wrote:Dexter is getting MFG'ed for the first time
Koki wrote:He must be Mandallorian FaLLouT God'ded ASAP
What about the precious juice?
off topic? OMG YOU'VE BEEN CENSORED... yet you're still posting. MYSTARY!!!!
Duck and Cover: THE site for all your Fallout needs
Duck and Cover: THE site for all your Fallout needs
hahahhahahhaha....... hahahhaha......... oh man...... lol... you funny man.Turan wrote: This is not Iraq, we have never betrayed the Iranians.
*cough* Mossadeq 1954 *cough*
If the US and UK hadn't toppled Iran's first democratically elected gov't (Mossadeq in 1954) right now you would have a democratic and NON theocratic gov't right in the heart of the middle east as a sort of stable prosperous oasis that would have most likely been a role model to the other surrounding nations. It can be argued that if the US didn't fuck everything up before they could have easily avoided all the acts of terror that's followed since.
oh and here's a good read for the ignorant and uninformed among you:
http://www.nytimes.com/library/world/mi ... index.html
bey.
I agree here. Though I still hold that Armenia should have Wilsonian (ie Kars, Trapeson & the bunch) borders.Spazmo wrote:FREE KURDISTAN
Main question is on the borders, though, obviously, as Kurdistan is right smack dab in the middle of Turks, Iranians, Azeris and Arabs on all sides.
And it has calmed down substantially, anyway. Hell, Erdorgan just set up the first Kurdish Language school in the country. Hell, before you know it it will be legal to call them Kurds and not Mountain Turks. Damned thats a fucked up country.
A) Debateable, as American foreign policy was to install self consciously Nazi regiems to stop the commies (and, weirldy, it worked)*cough* Mossadeq 1954 *cough*
No one remembers it, no one in Iran blames America for that.
Considering that among the most pro-American people I have ever known are Zoroastrian Iranians and Azeri Iranians, I am inclined to say that Iran would have been substantially more succesful then Iraq, and they actually have WMD.
- Neon Dingo
- Wanderer
- Posts: 460
- Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2003 5:01 am
- Contact:
Except for the whole oil part and how our entire technological existence is based off of oil.The Middle East needs to be nuked. It's the shit hole of the world.
Sure, they may be stupid fucking towel heads, but we really love to harvest dead dinosaurs from beneath their crusty, calloused feet.
I'm not too concerned with a revolution in Iran seeing as how the
"revolutionaries" will more than likely install a government with backwards Islamic principles. Fuck Islam.
If we're going to nuke the Middle East we might as well nuke everything else.
This sentence has thirty-two letters.
A) Yes, it worked so well that you're now fighting several different wars and on occassion get several buildings blown the fuck up.Turan wrote:A) Debateable, as American foreign policy was to install self consciously Nazi regiems to stop the commies (and, weirldy, it worked)*cough* Mossadeq 1954 *cough*
No one remembers it, no one in Iran blames America for that.
You're wrong. Mossadeq to Iran is the equivalent of Che to Cuba or what JFK was to America.
Every self-respecting educated Persian knows him and what he tried to do.
And Dingo you fucking tool, Iran has had a backwards Islamic government since 1979. If it weren't for the US' coup Iran's gov't would have still been a secular one up until today, sorta like Turkey except more prosperous and overall better?
And Islam shouldn't be singled out, all religions blow equally hard.
bey.