Ed Orman dev profile at NMA

Mr. Teatime · Post by **Mr. Teatime** » Mon Aug 09, 2004 5:03 pm

[ -> Interview]

<a href="http://www.nma-fallout.com">NMA</a> have a new <a href="http://www.nma-fallout.com/article.php? ... >developer profile</a>, this time for Ed Orman, who apparantly worked on <a href="http://www.interplay.com/tactics">Fallout: Tactics</a>.
 
 <blockquote>What is your hope for future Fallout games? Would you like to be a part of a future Fo team?
 
 I hope they make a third RPG game, whether it's turn-based or not, isometric or not; I would like to see that world alive again. I still believe it's also possible for the Fallout world to extend into different genres, which it might have to do to survive. I haven't played Brotherhood of Steel (the console one), so I don't know how successful they were there.</blockquote>
 
 Well, I'll tell you, Ed: THEY FAILED.
 
 Spotted at: <A HREF="http://www.nma-fallout.com">NMA</A>

PsychoSniper · Post by **PsychoSniper** » Mon Aug 09, 2004 7:11 pm

Yup, they did even worse than Craptics Ed.

Though I must admit to lovign the blue smoke rings the Gauss weapons had

Role-Player · Post by **Role-Player** » Mon Aug 09, 2004 8:54 pm

Thats pretty much the only thing PoS did right, l33t parikul effex.

Spazmo · Post by **Spazmo** » Mon Aug 09, 2004 9:21 pm

Well bugs aside, the FOT engine was pretty neat. Code in more robust TB combat, a dialog engine and the old skool style FO cursor and it could have powered a good RPG.