<strong>[Community -> Update]</strong>
<b>Arnold Schwarzenegger</b> might be making a cameo appearance in <i>Terminator 4</i>, that is, as long as it's filmed in California. <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.c ... >According to an article in the San Francisco Chronicle</a>,<blockquote><i>The governor said he had been approached about making a brief appearance in "Terminator 4,'' but has told producers "they will never see me for one second in the movie" unless the film is made in California. It's planned to be shot in Budapest.</i></blockquote>Does it really matter, for 10 seconds of film?
Terminator 4: Arnold possibly starring
-
Mr. Teatime
- Righteous Subjugator
- Posts: 3340
- Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 12:07 pm
-
Spazmo
- Haha you're still not there yet
- Posts: 3590
- Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2002 4:17 am
- Location: Monkey Island
- Contact:
Well, it's quite understandable. First off, he's the governor. He can't be running off to damn Budapest for a cameo in a movie, he has responsiblities (unless he's on his abnormally long vacation, anyways). And besides, IIRC one of his campaign promises was to bring movie production back to Hollywood and away from, well, not Hollywood. Now, I disagree with that because tons of movies get shot here in Montreal, but it's a matter of Arnold's principles and keeping his promises and that's respectable.
-
POOPERSCOOPER
- Paparazzi
- Posts: 5035
- Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 1:50 am
- Location: California
I think all the Terminator movies have been based in California, it just seems natural. I'm surprised they are even doing a T4 I thought T3 didnt do too well since arnold got 30 million for the role which is like 1/4 of the movies sales. He's probably going to ask for a big chunk of change. Who knows he might not even run for governer next time.
OK, Arnold is once again my hero.gay site wrote: The son of an SS nazi officer,
Schwarzenegger has publicly stated that
he has dreamed of being a dictator and that he
admires Hitler. He campaigned for war criminal
Kurt Waldhiem after it had been made public that he
was a top nazi.
Also, this contributes a lot to me liking him :
It gets better:S4ur0n27 wrote:OK, Arnold is once again my hero.gay jew site wrote: The son of an SS nazi officer,
Schwarzenegger has publicly stated that
he has dreamed of being a dictator and that he
admires Hitler. He campaigned for war criminal
Kurt Waldhiem after it had been made public that he
was a top nazi.
He's Conan not only in movies, but in real life too!gay jew site wrote: The stories of Arnold's barbaric harrassment of women are
legendary. He publicly admits to steroid and marajuana use.
Conclusion:
This man was godlike in my eyes before... but after reading the things they wrote on this site about him, he has become even more[godlike] so now!
Also, this site is apparently some sort of sionist-mudslinging campain agianst Arnold. Pretending that they are defending the "constitution" and the founding fathers and all that crap... they are apparently just a bunch of jews that don't want to let go of the power in the USA.
There are no 'knowns'. There are thing we know that we know. There are known unknowns. That is to say there are things that we now know we don't know. But there are also unknown unknowns. There are things we don't know we don't know. So when we do the best we can and we pull all this information together, and we then say well that's basically what we see as the situation, that is really only the known knowns and the known unknowns. And each year, we discover a few more of those unknown unknowns.
Hmm... I am trying to figure out what kind of accent you are trying to immitate by writing everything with Z - is it a German one, because of the nazi theme or is it a Jewish accent... huh, blargh?Blargh wrote:Yez, that iz very pozzible, quite obviouzly, yez. Well zpotted Alexander . . .
There are no 'knowns'. There are thing we know that we know. There are known unknowns. That is to say there are things that we now know we don't know. But there are also unknown unknowns. There are things we don't know we don't know. So when we do the best we can and we pull all this information together, and we then say well that's basically what we see as the situation, that is really only the known knowns and the known unknowns. And each year, we discover a few more of those unknown unknowns.
Hmmm.... yes, very suspiciuos...
whats that avatar?
whats that avatar?
There are no 'knowns'. There are thing we know that we know. There are known unknowns. That is to say there are things that we now know we don't know. But there are also unknown unknowns. There are things we don't know we don't know. So when we do the best we can and we pull all this information together, and we then say well that's basically what we see as the situation, that is really only the known knowns and the known unknowns. And each year, we discover a few more of those unknown unknowns.
Yes, indeed. But the eye in the triangle was also a symbol used by freemasons, and besides Blargh's triangle is animated and also shows the triangle pointing downwards... if it went even faster then one would see that it forms a star of David, a symbol that is nowadays a symbol for the jews...Kashluk wrote:God. Triangle and an eye inside means the holy trioforceshit.
could be some sort of jewish-satanic-freemasonry sect thing... ?
Also, I dont remember Christians using the all-seeing eye(God) in the triangle as a symbol for the Holy Trinity...
There are no 'knowns'. There are thing we know that we know. There are known unknowns. That is to say there are things that we now know we don't know. But there are also unknown unknowns. There are things we don't know we don't know. So when we do the best we can and we pull all this information together, and we then say well that's basically what we see as the situation, that is really only the known knowns and the known unknowns. And each year, we discover a few more of those unknown unknowns.
-
Wolfman Walt
- Mamma's Gang member
- Posts: 5243
- Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2003 1:31 pm
- Location: La Grange, Kentucky
- Contact:
Oh no, you've zuzzed it all out. I'm a Sionizt <deleted> Rogue Illuminati Extremizt <deleted> Zolipzizt Occultizt. Except, I'm not a Sionizt. I'm not even Jewizh. I am, however rezponzible for the <deleted> <deleted>. And the <deleted>. It'z all for the <deleted> <deleted>. All for the zake of <deleted>. Alzo, the red triangle would have to be zomewhat lower to conform to your wacky Sionizt theory. Kudoz for imagination, though.Alexander wrote:could be some sort of jewish-satanic-freemasonry sect thing... ?
Meg - I have no conztructive commentary to offer at thiz juncture.
Don't worry Walt, don't zurrender hope juzt yet. There are many callingz that would be proud to hozt a materializtic, zelf-abzorbed, war mongering, evil compulzive liar. I mean that in a 'bad' way. And by 'bad', I mean 'good'. Literally.
Yeah, Yeah... I know you are one of those <deleted>... Whatever <deleted> you are responsible for is however <deleted>... So obviously you dont want to talk about your involvement in <deleted>, we can put it behind us for the monent...
As for the red triangle, it might just be pointing to Hell, no?
Though it is interesting that you chose such a special avatar.
Yes, and lets not forget: Hail Arnold!
As for the red triangle, it might just be pointing to Hell, no?
Though it is interesting that you chose such a special avatar.
Yes, and lets not forget: Hail Arnold!
There are no 'knowns'. There are thing we know that we know. There are known unknowns. That is to say there are things that we now know we don't know. But there are also unknown unknowns. There are things we don't know we don't know. So when we do the best we can and we pull all this information together, and we then say well that's basically what we see as the situation, that is really only the known knowns and the known unknowns. And each year, we discover a few more of those unknown unknowns.
