More Van Buren Art

Post by **King of Creation** » Tue Feb 08, 2005 7:27 pm

[Game -> Images] - More info on <a href="http://wikipocalypse.duckandcover.cx/in ... le=Fallout 3 (Van Buren)">Game: Fallout 3 (Van Buren)</a> | More info on <a href="http://wikipocalypse.duckandcover.cx/in ... itle=Black Isle Studios">Company: Black Isle Studios</a> | More info on <a href="http://wikipocalypse.duckandcover.cx/in ... y">Company: Interplay</a>

<a href="http://www.rpgcodex.com">RPG Codex</a> have posted another concept image from the late Van Buren.  This one is another painting of a Junktown scene.

<a href="http://www.duckandcover.cx/gallery/disp ... -650"><img border="0" alt="Junktown Concept Art" src="http://www.duckandcover.cx/gallery/albu ... pecial.jpg" /></a>

I could go for some <a href="http://www.bethsoft.com">Bethesda</a> concept art, but that's just my preference. 

Spotted @ <a href="http://www.rpgcodex.com">RPG Codex</a>

Cimmerian Nights · Post by **Cimmerian Nights** » Tue Feb 08, 2005 7:53 pm

twist the knife a little more whydoncha

Mr. Teatime · Post by **Mr. Teatime** » Tue Feb 08, 2005 8:07 pm

I really couldn't care less. I mean no disrespect to the developers, but it's just concept art. Any dev house can draw pretty pictures. It's nice for reminiscing on, I guess, but there's only so far it can go.

Post by **Retlaw83** » Tue Feb 08, 2005 9:40 pm

I agree with Teatime. Obsessing over a game that will never be is like technological masturbation.

S4ur0n27 · Post by **S4ur0n27** » Tue Feb 08, 2005 9:41 pm

Chernobill is concept art too.

Blargh · Post by **Blargh** » Tue Feb 08, 2005 9:50 pm

Retlaw83 wrote:I agree with Teatime. Obsessing over a game that will never be is like technological masturbation.

Is that one way of saying you're against broadening your horizons in that regard ? Ahahaha.

Post by **Retlaw83** » Wed Feb 09, 2005 12:23 pm

Blargh wrote:
Retlaw83 wrote:I agree with Teatime. Obsessing over a game that will never be is like technological masturbation.
Is that one way of saying you're against broadening your horizons in that regard ? Ahahaha.

I'm saying it would be like me saying people would never get to see the short story I'm working on, posting a couple paragraphs of it, then expecting people to get all worked up over it.

Blargh · Post by **Blargh** » Wed Feb 09, 2005 1:50 pm

I understood your original analogy, Retlaw. 'Twas an admittedly tepid attempt at humour on my part. Ah well, it worked well enough for me.

S4ur0n27 · Post by **S4ur0n27** » Wed Feb 09, 2005 2:27 pm

That's good enough if you can make yourself burst into laugher.

Blargh · Post by **Blargh** » Wed Feb 09, 2005 2:46 pm

It certainly is, D5it-m38. It is quite therapeutic.

hat_man99 · Post by **hat_man99** » Thu Feb 10, 2005 12:16 am

Really D5it-m37 has always worked for me

[/quote]

hat_man99 · Post by **hat_man99** » Thu Feb 10, 2005 12:16 am

Really D5it-m37 has always worked for me

S4ur0n27 · Post by **S4ur0n27** » Thu Feb 10, 2005 12:20 am

Good job, cuntrag.

Brother None · Post by **Brother None** » Thu Feb 10, 2005 1:05 am

Mr. Teatime wrote:I really couldn't care less.

So stop posting them, nobody's forcing yah. Hey presto, problem solved

It sure beats the hell out of posting about RA and Metalheart

S4ur0n27 · Post by **S4ur0n27** » Thu Feb 10, 2005 1:40 am

It's not even Teatime who posted the news.

Now write two paragraphs on how I suck please.

Spazmo · Post by **Spazmo** » Thu Feb 10, 2005 1:40 am

Not really, because RA and Metalheart are games that WILL BE RELEASED (well, we'll see for Metalheart but anyways). Continually posting images and shit from Van Buren is NECROPHILIA. You are FUCKING a CORPSE.

Mr. Teatime · Post by **Mr. Teatime** » Thu Feb 10, 2005 1:49 am

Nothing wrong with posting the news, after all it's Fallout-related. I'm just not going to jump for joy over the images. I've moved on. I even think the devs have moved on now (apparently these images didn't come from a developer after all).

Just another newsbit really. The wiki we're working on is a lot more interesting to me.