Make spammers wasteland only

Megatron · Post by **Megatron** » Sat Jun 11, 2005 1:59 pm

you know who

hat_man99 · Post by **hat_man99** » Sat Jun 11, 2005 2:26 pm

No who?

Antimeasure · Post by **Antimeasure** » Sat Jun 11, 2005 3:12 pm

Why not just ban naked_lunch?

hat_man99 · Post by **hat_man99** » Sat Jun 11, 2005 3:35 pm

Whats with you and Naked_Lunch Antimeasure, have i missed a thread or two where you try to kick his ass, you do and hes still....well, retarded is the closet word to it

Dan · Post by **Dan** » Sat Jun 11, 2005 6:27 pm

Why not just lock the trash can?

Naked_Lunch · Post by **Naked_Lunch** » Sun Jun 12, 2005 1:36 am

Antimeasure can never kick my ass. He's a fucking swede for god's sake!

Antimeasure · Post by **Antimeasure** » Sun Jun 12, 2005 2:26 am

how did you came up with that? did you use your spyglass from your "the little detective" set?
choke on a muffin, you fucking brat.

Naked_Lunch · Post by **Naked_Lunch** » Sun Jun 12, 2005 2:35 pm

How droll.

ExtremeDrinker · Post by **ExtremeDrinker** » Sun Jun 12, 2005 3:07 pm

How Kubruick

atoga · Post by **atoga** » Sun Jun 12, 2005 4:34 pm

How about a banning poll that's FOR REAL this time? Huh? Huh? Eh? Huh? Ahh....

Naked_Lunch · Post by **Naked_Lunch** » Sun Jun 12, 2005 4:56 pm

Naw, we don't want to inflate Subhuman's ego more than it already is.

Ernesto · Post by **Ernesto** » Sun Jun 12, 2005 5:18 pm

Naked_Lunch wrote:Naw, we don't want to inflate Subhuman's ego more than it already is.

An ego erection, so to speak?

Naked_Lunch · Post by **Naked_Lunch** » Sun Jun 12, 2005 5:21 pm

No, he already has one. If we made an acutally bannation poll, it would be like Subhuman od'ing on Viagra and Cialis.

Post by **DarkUnderlord** » Mon Jun 13, 2005 12:50 am

Naked_Lunch - Posts: 336 [0.22% of total / 2.40 posts per day]
Megatron - Posts: 6700 [4.31% of total / 5.82 posts per day]

Right, so... who's the spammer again?

Take the poll!

Megatron · Post by **Megatron** » Mon Jun 13, 2005 1:01 am

hey how about you not be a dick

If his sig has +1 post and his posts mainly consist of 'lol swell guy', then why let him drag every topic he posts in to him and susan suckling on the teat of mankind huh. Though I don't really give a shit anyway it'll just make the forums more of a waste of time to read. How could you just let it slide when the forum will end up as an even bigger pile of wank.

And yeah yeah, taking internet seriously omg lol. But it doesn't mean you have to be a total prick all the time. Perhaps there can be some balance between one extreme to another. Either spamming all the time or taking everything seriously. From mods getting involved in forum drama to doing fuck all.

Antimeasure · Post by **Antimeasure** » Mon Jun 13, 2005 1:11 am

how come DarkUnderlord arent in the poll?

p.s: i would be happy if naked_lunch got the "oooh my haiiiir" sign with picture.

S4ur0n27 · Post by **S4ur0n27** » Mon Jun 13, 2005 2:01 pm

Still no votes for me

Naked_Lunch · Post by **Naked_Lunch** » Mon Jun 13, 2005 8:36 pm

Antimeasure wrote:how come DarkUnderlord arent in the poll?.

Because DU is a bad-ass motherfucker who gets all the chicks.

S4ur0n27 · Post by **S4ur0n27** » Mon Jun 13, 2005 9:00 pm

Did he get you?

Naked_Lunch · Post by **Naked_Lunch** » Mon Jun 13, 2005 9:14 pm

I'm not a chick.

Yet.

Duck and Cover

Make spammers wasteland only

Who should we ban?

Make spammers wasteland only