Ron Perlman is the new Conan

Thor Kaufman · Post by **Thor Kaufman** » Fri Nov 04, 2005 5:07 pm

9/11 NEVER FORGET

S4ur0n27 · Post by **S4ur0n27** » Fri Nov 04, 2005 8:09 pm

Rutger Hauer is way overrated.

johnnygothisgun · Post by **johnnygothisgun** » Fri Nov 04, 2005 9:00 pm

S4ur0n27 wrote:Rutger Hauer is way overrated.

eat a dick

S4ur0n27 · Post by **S4ur0n27** » Fri Nov 04, 2005 9:35 pm

Apart from being good in Blade Runner and having a cool name, what did he do?

vx trauma · Post by **vx trauma** » Fri Nov 04, 2005 9:51 pm

hitch hiker and good job in sin city

S4ur0n27 · Post by **S4ur0n27** » Fri Nov 04, 2005 10:24 pm

It's not like his role in Sin City was tough.

PiP · Post by **PiP** » Fri Nov 04, 2005 10:59 pm

vx trauma wrote:hitch hiker and good job in sin city

it was "The Hitcher" and there was also something for post-apoc geeks: The Blood of Heroes, the teenage flick Blind Fury and an appearance in Batman Begins but, needless to say, Blade Runner was Hauer's best role, largely due to the film being so good.

MadBill · Post by **MadBill** » Sat Nov 05, 2005 12:36 am

Blade Runner is easily one of the best movies. It tends to make everything else look like shit without even trying.

Cimmerian Nights · Post by **Cimmerian Nights** » Sat Nov 05, 2005 4:02 pm

PiP wrote:Blind Fury

Cheesey hollywood Zatoichi ripoff, blatant and shameless.

PiP · Post by **PiP** » Mon Nov 07, 2005 12:55 am

you're obviously mistaking the order, but cheesy - never said it wasn't; on the contrary, I called it a 'teenage flick' from which you were to infer my judgement of its value.

Cimmerian Nights · Post by **Cimmerian Nights** » Mon Nov 07, 2005 7:48 pm

PiP wrote:you're obviously mistaking the order

Zatoichi started in the 60s dude, did about 30 movies and were dead in their graves before Hauer and Takeshi showed up to pimp it out their remakes.

ApTyp · Post by **ApTyp** » Mon Nov 07, 2005 8:24 pm

MadBill wrote:Blade Runner is easily one of the best movies. It tends to make everything else look like shit without even trying.

Most overrated movie ever. Yes, I've watched it.

S4ur0n27 · Post by **S4ur0n27** » Mon Nov 07, 2005 8:39 pm

Cimmerian Nights wrote:
PiP wrote:you're obviously mistaking the order
Zatoichi started in the 60s dude, did about 30 movies and were dead in their graves before Hauer and Takeshi showed up to pimp it out their remakes.

Takeshi Kitano's Zatoichi is actually better than the originals, IMHO.

Cimmerian Nights · Post by **Cimmerian Nights** » Mon Nov 07, 2005 11:20 pm

It was much better than some - but he pretty much stuck to the old formula. It's kind of like Jim Jarmusch doing a Rocky movie.

PiP · Post by **PiP** » Tue Nov 08, 2005 12:36 am

Cimmerian Nights wrote:
PiP wrote:you're obviously mistaking the order
Zatoichi started in the 60s dude, did about 30 movies and were dead in their graves before Hauer and Takeshi showed up to pimp it out their remakes.

I thought you were refering to the remake as a potential Blind Fury's predecessor.
I didn't know Zatoichi was known well enough before the 'remake' to influence Hollywood movies (Blind Fury was Hollywood, right?)
I guess you may be right.

Subhuman · Post by **Subhuman** » Tue Nov 08, 2005 5:01 am

Wasn't Rutger Hauer also in the original Buffy movie?

RUTGER HAUER IS EMO.

St. Toxic · Post by **St. Toxic** » Tue Nov 08, 2005 12:20 pm

He's totally not.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0109779/

HEIL YOU!

S4ur0n27 · Post by **S4ur0n27** » Tue Nov 08, 2005 2:24 pm

Even if he didn't play in Buffy he still played in a bunch of shitty mvoies.

St. Toxic · Post by **St. Toxic** » Tue Nov 08, 2005 4:15 pm

Don't see how that matters.