Civil War

Blargh · Post by **Blargh** » Fri Dec 16, 2005 8:47 am

pIp wrote:bullshitting

Yet, as you have said, and quite correctly too : there is only opinion. There is experience, as automatic as breath, yet, free from measurement and comparison, there is and can be no knowledge or certainty.

pIp wrote:follow

We have been over this, or have you forgotten ? Perhaps you are telepathic, and know my mind with greater clarity than I do ? Perhaps you subscribe to solipsism, perchance ?

At this point, a dissection of my purposes and designs would be fruitless.

So. Yes, and for the last time, my 'proposal' does not, nor will it, represent any desire of mine. For (what should be) obvious reasons.

pIp wrote:really?

Really.

pIp wrote:simplistic?

Perhaps. Perhaps. PERHAPS.

Perhaps your grasp of what you wholeheartedly believe to be my understanding of the connotations of 'want' is flawed ?

Language : it cannot be standardised between minds. We have our 'truth', pIp. When faced with the unknowable, let there at least be a pretense of contentment.

pIp wrote:someone

As we are, alas, dealing with thought and opinion, that 'someone' is not you, nor me. You have your thoughts and opinions, they are not, nor will they be mine. And so, your declaration of intellectual conquest is rather moot.

Without certainty and standard, you cannot 'know' you are 'correct'. Or 'incorrect', for that matter. Again, moot.

pIp wrote:obvious.

Yet you resist. Quaint.

pIp wrote:opinion,

Ah ! They do open.

pIp wrote:drift.

Years past, and with that realisation, that admission, there can be no certainty, no correctness, no knowledge, no truth. Opinion exists independent from these qualities, yet you would force them together and over another.

pIp wrote:Cheers

No, thank you, pIp. 'Twas amusing. Need but think of this exchange, and behold ! A smile, a smirk, a laugh.

pIp wrote:afraid

What you have taken for fear, is disdain.

You have your 'truth', pIp, I have mine. And that is all.

airsoft guy · Post by **airsoft guy** » Fri Dec 16, 2005 10:14 am

Kashluk wrote:
airsoft guy wrote:This is the most dangerous man in the entire conflict, for he knows how to aim a rifle.
Well, like said, most of those people in Africa can't propably read so expert firearms handling can't really be expected, now can it? In Africa armchair commandos like you would be promoted to ÃƒÆ’Ã…â€œber-Generalissimos right away.

And yes, after reading some other replies by airsoft guy, posted after the above quoted one, my feelings towards him have only been reinforced.

He's totally scary.

Explain.

Is it scary that I learn things about the world around me and the things that happen to interest me are conflict and the tools of it?

Conflict, fighting, wars, combat, it's a major part of the human animal, as with just about any other creature on the planet, we just happen to have tools for the act that can wipe the Earth clean within a few hours. It really wouldn't be any different than studying any other aspect of humans.

Plus, learning is fun because knowledge is power

Kashluk · Post by **Kashluk** » Fri Dec 16, 2005 11:50 am

Well I actually meant this:

airsoft guy wrote:The reason for this particular man to be wearing a vest could be that he thinks it'll offer him protection because he's a dumb swell guy, whether it be physical or spiritual (you know, like if a shaman or whatever put some juju on it).

The other reason is for the colors. The reason you see them wearing goofy shit isn't because they're really poor, it's because it might be the only thing around with that color. They tell who's on which side by colors since all swell guy look alike

combined with your well known gun enthusiasm, it gave me the creeps.

Redeye · Post by **Redeye** » Fri Dec 16, 2005 1:10 pm

Kashluk is hooked on the Black Velvet.
Maybe.

PiP · Post by **PiP** » Fri Dec 16, 2005 7:18 pm

So I've managed to elicit some real communicating, rather than trying to get rid of me with decorative platitudes. That's nice.

Blargh wrote:You have your 'truth', pIp, I have mine. And that is all.

that's what I meant (among other things). But without 'drunk'

Blargh wrote:What you have taken for fear, is disdain.

sorry, but you're wrong; I identified your 'disdain' quite correctly. In fact it was hardly difficult. What I wrote was slightly ironic: hence the misunderstanding perhaps.

nice talking to ye

*

*(no I wouldn't, in fact, touch you, no worries, but the concluding bit was frank - 'tis hard to find as challenging interlocutor as yourself, be it merely for the fact that my command of English is not on par with that of an eloquent native speaker)

VasikkA · Post by **VasikkA** » Fri Dec 16, 2005 7:27 pm

The first flamewar on DaC without obscenities and low blows. I'm shocked!

vx trauma · Post by **vx trauma** » Fri Dec 16, 2005 8:34 pm

ONE STEP CLOSER TO FEELINGS ONLINE AND GROUPHUG FORUM.

HAPPY FUCGIN FRIDAY PAL.

Blargh · Post by **Blargh** » Fri Dec 16, 2005 9:47 pm

pIp wrote:real

It smelt unununreal, did it ? Insincere, surreal, or merely wanting. Though it is perhaps wrong to write of fault, whose is it, really ?

And for that matter, who are we to write and define reality ?

pIp wrote:rid

Not at all ! It was, ending, your decision. I, for <numbers>, am aghast that you feel this way, pIp. Like many, if not all of DAC's user base, this cesspit is suffered in the hope of amusement. Occasionally, very occasionally, it pays out.

Which is nice. Like the eye of a duck.

To the limpet, question two holds relevance.

pIp wrote:meant

The Ocean recedes, there is always patience.

pIp wrote:wrong

If you think so, though I will cheerfully maintain disagreement with disturbing enthusiasm.

pIp wrote:identified

Indeed, it was mentioned. Ahaha.

pIp wrote:ironic

O, the ignominy ! Slight of mind ! Irony ?!

That's just . . . wonderful. I am ecstatic* by proxy.

pIp wrote:talking

Think of the small children, and leave my vocal chords out of this, you unusually Cruel, Condescending, Polish Cunt.

VasikkA wrote:obscenities

Written too soon in retrospect. Oho.

*Do you see ? Do you see ? Do you s - HELLO, DO NOT LOOK BEHIND THE CURTAIN !

PiP · Post by **PiP** » Sat Dec 17, 2005 2:07 am

Blargh wrote:this cesspit is suffered in the hope of amusement. Occasionally, very occasionally, it pays out.

agreed

Like the eye of a duck.

"you were wrong" If you think so, though I will cheerfully maintain disagreement with disturbing enthusiasm.

sometimes even such a big boy like you has to reevaluate things, so think again. No I don't need your admitting anything.

you unusually Cruel, Condescending, Polish Cunt.

I'm flattered. Especially by "condescending", I'd think you had a monopoly on it.

Talking of amusement in the cesspit, it's a pity you can't refrain from graphomania. Or can you? It does not taste good. Or does it to you?
If you are seeking amusement, why not increase the chances of getting it and produce less gilt-tinted cess? You should know it well by now that all the fancy ormaments aren't worth a shit, especially compared with logical arguments, genuine information, academic informative, crisp, and elegantly plain writing? I know you're technically capable of this. (no I'm not going to resort to cheap ad-personam flaming and say "you're a dumb fuck" or anything to this effect)
So, what is it going to be: we talk or we walk?

Blargh · Post by **Blargh** » Sat Dec 17, 2005 12:32 pm

pIp wrote:reevaluate

No. It is a question of scope, not adjustment. Ponder or (so surmised) abandon as you like, it will persist.

pIp wrote:monopoly

*laughs*

pIp wrote:refrain

Always another, the aberration. Written of pity, too ! Delightful.

pIp wrote:seeking

Now you claim to know the laughter ? A nasty, albeit hilarious habit, pIp. To objectives, to tastes, what has been confessed ? I do not recall. Why O why, how could that be so, when stalled with such conviction ?

pIp wrote:should

Were there only padding, how easily wrought. Nonetheless, I bemoan your tendency to blithely accept what you see without apparent argument or query.

Perhaps not in plain sight, even 'against the odds' - essence is intrinsic. It requires no audience, especially one so bound by apathy. If elusive and purchased with tears, blame the author. Yes !

Faultless.

pIp wrote:plain

Semantics. Yes. What is devoid of worth and meandering to one . . .

Egocentric, perhaps ?

pIp wrote:technically

Doubled, brilliant ! Ahahahaha.

pIp wrote:cheap

Exactly, why fritter away words on the crude when you can insinuate self-imposed exile from (a scant few of) the virtues of writing ? A matter of scope, again. Like an especially voracious mosquito. Bravo !

Regardless, what is thought often needs not be committed to text. Implicit.

pIp wrote:or

Writing 'plainly', oho :

It would be perfidious to diminish my writings for the sake of convenience and languor. Pattern is as necessary as their passenger, even if it continues unseen.

By your latest tirade, your demand for 'change', you have found your patience and comprehension wanting. At such a price, as humourous as this has been, at heart of hearts, 'worth' has been exaggerated. Consequently, I suggest you locate another more agreeable to write down to, dear pIp. I dare claim it would be 'simpler'.

Perhaps too, there will be walking, rather than the talking of. A novel concept.

Aneurysm · Post by **Aneurysm** » Sat Dec 17, 2005 2:08 pm

Geez, get a freaking room you two

PiP · Post by **PiP** » Sat Dec 17, 2005 3:11 pm

Blargh wrote:Pattern is as necessary as their passenger, even if it continues unseen.

too bad the pattern is nauseating. Will you see? But please, show off some more.

down to

grasp! brava! No, just teasing.

A novel concept

why don't you try this, too?

armyguy16 · Post by **armyguy16** » Thu Dec 22, 2005 3:01 am

Let's just nuke Africa already and clean the continent before the silly bastard gets even more annoying.

PsychoSniper · Post by **PsychoSniper** » Wed Jan 04, 2006 8:43 am

Someone needs to photoshop this guy jumping out of goatse man's ass.

PiP · Post by **PiP** » Wed Jan 04, 2006 11:03 am

is this a big gold buckle on his underwear?

Koki · Post by **Koki** » Wed Jan 04, 2006 1:23 pm

He can't afford a shirt but has underwear for 200$. How typical!

VasikkA · Post by **VasikkA** » Wed Jan 04, 2006 2:48 pm

Is that image from New Orleans ?

Jennifer · Post by **Jennifer** » Wed Jan 04, 2006 4:02 pm

i especially like that one of the woman in the red shirt hijacking the dude's car with an assault rifle. that's quality

S4ur0n27 · Post by **S4ur0n27** » Wed Jan 04, 2006 4:15 pm

Koki wrote:He can't afford a shirt but has underwear for 200$. How typical!

You don't need a shirt if you live in the jungle

Nicolai · Post by **Nicolai** » Wed Jan 04, 2006 5:56 pm

Yeah, just ask Rex.