Ad blocker detected: Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker on our website.
Kashluk wrote:Well I should say that in my opinion I did put weight on words "most" in "most life" and destroying *mankind* - specifically, mankind as the whole thriving complex of civilization, culture and heritage - not literally every single human being. So basically all what we've accomplished / ruined so far would be whiped off the face of the Earth along with most of things we consider as "life", but most likely nature would take care of it's own and return another living, breathing cycle of wonderful critters and flora on this planet, within the following 100 million years or so. And technically that shouldn't stop human beings from excisting and/or some sort of a latter incarnation of our species from forming.
No! You should tackle my argument with a ruthless low-blow that scars my fragile know-it-all self-image and questions my sexual orientation. Or maybe I was just bewildered by the amount of slashes in your post, but yeah, we hunams rock !
Mad Max RW wrote:There's no way to accurately predict when and if a particular asteroid will hit.
Math. I consider a probability accurate enough.
I'm gonna have a astrophysics class next semester by the way. Anyway, I'm pretty sure physicists can measure and predict trajectories and momentum of cosmic stuff. It's not that complicated.
