Ad blocker detected: Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker on our website.
your chart Meg was cooler in terms of extra value such as penis and snake/monster
but Kashluk's is superior in terms of illustraiting the basics of genetics. Simple.
Yo Kash, draw a few cocks and you beat him!
+ the f3-generation's genotyical composition is messed up. Based on the parents' genotyp you would expect blond and brown hair as well as blue and brown eyes to be equally represented in the offspring.
Sometimes an atomic weapon is just an atomic weapon, ja?
Lynxer wrote:+ the f3-generation's genotyical composition is messed up. Based on the parents' genotyp you would expect blond and brown hair as well as blue and brown eyes to be equally represented in the offspring.
Uhmm, which one do you mean?
I noticed that the second generation offspring on the left(below 'INCEST') should be represented by 16 siblings, not 8. The ratio(hair color & eye color) should be 9:3:3:1.
I couldn't bother to draw 16 different kids so I just drew 8 to proove my point. The relations are quite correct, however: 1/4 blonde and 1/4 blue-eyed. See:
But it's *still* beyond my point - I just wanted to back up my claim that blonde & blue-eyed people have similar offspring.
I actually did the labour force bureau's job aptitude test, which shows the professions that'd be best suited for me... It was quite stressing to go through the kazillion questions on megabillion different answering sheets (I think there's an e-version out these days? at least there should be...), but after I was done and my answers were analysed, it was quite entertaining to read the stuff...
Apparently I'm most suitable (5/5) to become a judge. I also scored 4/5 aptitude for becoming a teacher (!), a journalist or a city manager / mayor
Lynxer wrote:+ the f3-generation's genotyical composition is messed up. Based on the parents' genotyp you would expect blond and brown hair as well as blue and brown eyes to be equally represented in the offspring.
Uhmm, which one do you mean?
I noticed that the second generation offspring on the left(below 'INCEST') should be represented by 16 siblings, not 8. The ratio(hair color & eye color) should be 9:3:3:1.
The genotypical composition of the f3 generation that derives from the crossing of a heterozygous and homozygous parent is not in accordance with the expected distrubution of alleles an identical crossing would yield.
Sometimes an atomic weapon is just an atomic weapon, ja?
No, it isn't. It's not supposed to be a complete chart like tha latter drawing I posted. Those were just 4 picked examples to proove my point about homogeneous parents getting homogeneous offspring.
Carib wrote:homosexual parents have no kids, period. Adam and Steve can't make a Phil.
Of course, gay parents will soon be able to take strands of their DNA and combine them and make their homo kid.
I don't know how you can combine two cells from persons with same sex, unless you're MacGyver. Gay couples can always adopt/steal/clone a child.
it's probably about a situation when gay (homosexual) people, a man and a woman, have sex against their preference and conceive a baby.
Anyway, homosexuality isn't 100% genetically determined. Identical twins have 100% the same genes, but a research showed that among a number of cases of identical twins with one twin homosexual, the other twin was also homosexual in 50% of cases. It was 22% with non-identical twins and 11% with regular siblings. (these numbers are for male twins, the numbers for females are: 48% for identical twins and 16% for non-identical)
(research carried out by Michael Bailey and Richard Pillard)
so the conclusion is, genes play a big part in determining sexual preference, but they aren't the only factor.
