So I was looking at ebay...
- King of Creation
- Righteous Subjugator
- Posts: 5103
- Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 3:00 pm
- Contact:
- [HpA]SniperPotato
- Desert Wanderer
- Posts: 518
- Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2004 2:23 am
- Location: Everywhere and Nowhere
- Contact:
I take computer parts from hotels and put them in mine. Soon I will be the proud owner a 3.2ghz P4 processor. That is.. not until I learn how to put it in and take it out.
Fallout Tactics multiplayer: COOPnet and MegaCOOP map pack
- Frater Perdurabo
- Paragon
- Posts: 2427
- Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2006 11:51 am
- Location: Võro
I have AMD64 FX-53, got it pretty much when it came out, and I'm happy with it. The only damn annoying thing is that my memory controller has fucked up, so I can only run on 512 RAM instead of my usual 1024... And I don't know whether it's the memory controller within my motherboard or processor :@
Any advice?
Any advice?
- Fa11lloutfan_15
- Strider
- Posts: 759
- Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2005 7:24 pm
- Wolfman Walt
- Mamma's Gang member
- Posts: 5243
- Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2003 1:31 pm
- Location: La Grange, Kentucky
- Contact:
- Fa11lloutfan_15
- Strider
- Posts: 759
- Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2005 7:24 pm
Virtual memory is not nearly fast enough to replace physical. Although, better virtual memory in addition to his 512 megabytes than none at all, of course.Megatron wrote:control panel>system>advanced>performance settings>advanced>virtual memory?
Frater Perdurabo: The only way you will know is by using another processor or motherboard. If it still doesn't work, it's the other component that is faulty. But with this new generation of processors which has recently emerged, perhaps you wan't to get rid of your current CPU/motherboard configuration altogether some time soon. Core 2 Duo is looking hot.
Have you checked the actual memory module? One of your 512 RAMs might have gone bad.Frater Perdurabo wrote:I have AMD64 FX-53, got it pretty much when it came out, and I'm happy with it. The only damn annoying thing is that my memory controller has fucked up, so I can only run on 512 RAM instead of my usual 1024... And I don't know whether it's the memory controller within my motherboard or processor :@
Any advice? :|
TinyTeeth, you are banned.
There are no 'knowns'. There are thing we know that we know. There are known unknowns. That is to say there are things that we now know we don't know. But there are also unknown unknowns. There are things we don't know we don't know. So when we do the best we can and we pull all this information together, and we then say well that's basically what we see as the situation, that is really only the known knowns and the known unknowns. And each year, we discover a few more of those unknown unknowns.
- Frater Perdurabo
- Paragon
- Posts: 2427
- Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2006 11:51 am
- Location: Võro
I was actually thinking about getting a new motherboard (provided that it's the fault of the motherboard), but my problem is that I have a Shuttle, so it's a pain to dismantle, replace components, etc.TinyTeeth wrote:Virtual memory is not nearly fast enough to replace physical. Although, better virtual memory in addition to his 512 megabytes than none at all, of course.Megatron wrote:control panel>system>advanced>performance settings>advanced>virtual memory?
Frater Perdurabo: The only way you will know is by using another processor or motherboard. If it still doesn't work, it's the other component that is faulty. But with this new generation of processors which has recently emerged, perhaps you wan't to get rid of your current CPU/motherboard configuration altogether some time soon. Core 2 Duo is looking hot.
Besides that, I just got this bad boy about a year ago so I'm not exactly rushing to get a new one. My stats are:
AMD 64 FX-53
1024 RAM (1/2 of that now -_-) Dual sticks of Corsair XMS3200 512
ATI Radeon x800 XT Platinum Edition
my shitty motherboard: NVIDIA nForce3 250
That's pretty much it. Apart from that, I got a 400 gig HDD and DVD-RW, etc. All the goodies. I just wish that my damn RAM worked though -_-
I ran memory tests on both of the chips. I can start the computer up with either one of them inside, but when I put both in, the computer usually fails to bootAlexander wrote:Have you checked the actual memory module? One of your 512 RAMs might have gone bad.Frater Perdurabo wrote:I have AMD64 FX-53, got it pretty much when it came out, and I'm happy with it. The only damn annoying thing is that my memory controller has fucked up, so I can only run on 512 RAM instead of my usual 1024... And I don't know whether it's the memory controller within my motherboard or processor :@
Any advice?
TinyTeeth, you are banned.
edit: at the moment, I have assigned 768-1536 MB for virtual memory, should I increase that?
- Thor Kaufman
- Mamma's Gang member
- Posts: 5081
- Joined: Mon Dec 16, 2002 11:56 am
- Contact:
- Frater Perdurabo
- Paragon
- Posts: 2427
- Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2006 11:51 am
- Location: Võro
Did that alreadyThor Kaufman wrote:update your bios or mainboard drivers, mango
Yeah, like back in the days when I still used to have my 486 lol.St. Toxic wrote:I miss my p2, it was like an immortal mule. With proper tweaking, there wasn't anything I couldn't run on it. Now it's all BIG FUCKING NUMBERS TIMES TWO r30000 X64 BONANZA TRIPOD MASTURBATION and nothing to show for it -- a few years and your comp chokes on notepad.