in the immortal words of johnnygothisgun, "qfe".Gwenfloor's location wrote:one of the mindless totalitarian-controlled masses...
Calling it Quits
You nonsensical twat! The animals do not feel victimized!Gwenfloor wrote:Art?! The animals cannot consent! They are being exploited for people's pleasure!
Did you even watch the animated gif!? That horse had an erection and mounted the man himself! Of course he consents!
The animal got it's rocks off, it wouldn't have entered the man on it's own if it hadn't wanted to.
Grow some logic bones.
- Frater Perdurabo
- Paragon
- Posts: 2427
- Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2006 11:51 am
- Location: Võro
Your presence offens no-one, you are just making yourself the laughing stock of the forum. It's the internet. Chill out.Gwenfloor wrote:Whatever. Regardless of what you guys say, I am not an emo, a preacher, or otherwise. If you will resort to name-calling and swearing then I obiously have no place among you. I do not care who is wrong or right, but my presence offends you. Goodbye.
- Thor Kaufman
- Mamma's Gang member
- Posts: 5081
- Joined: Mon Dec 16, 2002 11:56 am
- Contact:
- Antimeasure
- Strider
- Posts: 744
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 8:24 pm
made me a wee bit.From: Gwenfloor
To: atoga
Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2006 3:30 pm
Subject: People are posting Beastiality in the Wasteland
While the Wasteland is unmoderated, the act of posting such material is illegal, and could result in serious legal trouble.
They could be found in this thread:
http://www.duckandcover.cx/forums/viewtopic.php?t=16237
suppose you're thinking about a plate of shrimp. suddenly somebody will say like 'plate' or 'shrimp' or 'plate of shrimp', out of the blue, no explanation.
And, I think there are states where it's allowed.Nicolai wrote:Wonder if the guy is aware of the fact that US law means jack shit over here?atoga wrote:While the Wasteland is unmoderated, the act of posting such material is illegal, and could result in serious legal trouble.
Even in the US.
Not sure.
But I think so.
Golly.Wikipedia wrote:As with Australia, laws are determined at the state level. Many U.S. states[20] explicitly outlaw sex with animals (sometimes under the term of "sodomy" or "unnatural crime against nature"). Others do not.
Many U.S. state laws against "sodomy" (generally in the context of male homosexuality) were repealed or struck down by the courts in Lawrence v. Texas, which ruled that perceived moral disapproval on its own was an insufficient justification for banning a private act.[21] On the other hand, the 2004 conviction of a man in Florida (State vs. Mitchell) demonstrated that even in states with no specific laws against zoosexual acts, animal cruelty statutes would instead be applied, and Muth v. Frank showed that some courts might be "desperate to avoid the plain consequences" of Lawrence and may make "narrow and strained" efforts to avoid seeing it as relevant to other consensual private acts beyond the realm of homosexuality.[22]
Finally, the 1999 Philip Buble case showed that when a self-confessed zoophile is assaulted and the assault is motivated by his zoophilia (ie hate crime), a jury can convict the assailant and a judge give a stern sentence, despite the controversial nature of the cause.
- Thor Kaufman
- Mamma's Gang member
- Posts: 5081
- Joined: Mon Dec 16, 2002 11:56 am
- Contact:
- hoochimama
- Respected
- Posts: 79
- Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2004 7:56 pm
Just like sex with minors it should be different if the animal/kid is the one giving and the zoophiliac/hot schoolteacher is the one on the receiving end.
These cases of 20 something female schoolteachers going to jail for sleeping with their students are absurd and if you never stretch out your leg for your dog every once in a while now that's animal cruelty.
These cases of 20 something female schoolteachers going to jail for sleeping with their students are absurd and if you never stretch out your leg for your dog every once in a while now that's animal cruelty.
- TelemachusSneezed
- Wanderer
- Posts: 472
- Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2006 1:26 am
- Location: Obama-land
Jebus, if you can't see the difference between "eating dead non-human flesh" and "fucking live non-human flesh," no wonder the world's in such a state. It's sa'll 'bout consent, my nigga.Thor Kaufman wrote:I don't see the problem with zoophilia, except for the bigot american christnazi issue. People are eating burgers and stuff, go hunting seals with clubs etc.
Whatta cop-out. "Anti-judgement" is P.C.; only "judgement" is not accepted by mainstream society.Mismatch wrote:You, on the other hand, deserve to be offended, preaching morals and ethics to others; expecting them to live by your standards is not only wrong, it is also bloody annoying.
You, my dear cockgobbler, are no better than those you seek to judge.
Anyways, hooray for horse porn! More, better, faster!
Death to quotes.
I don't like all of what you just said. Change your opinions and rephrase.TelemachusSneezed wrote:Jebus, if you can't see the difference between "eating dead non-human flesh" and "fucking live non-human flesh," no wonder the world's in such a state. It's sa'll 'bout consent, my nigga.Thor Kaufman wrote:I don't see the problem with zoophilia, except for the bigot american christnazi issue. People are eating burgers and stuff, go hunting seals with clubs etc.
Whatta cop-out. "Anti-judgement" is P.C.; only "judgement" is not accepted by mainstream society.Mismatch wrote:You, on the other hand, deserve to be offended, preaching morals and ethics to others; expecting them to live by your standards is not only wrong, it is also bloody annoying.
You, my dear cockgobbler, are no better than those you seek to judge.
F+
- Thor Kaufman
- Mamma's Gang member
- Posts: 5081
- Joined: Mon Dec 16, 2002 11:56 am
- Contact:
qfe +rep SuperHSuperH wrote:I don't like all of what you just said. Change your opinions and rephrase.TelemachusSneezed wrote:Jebus, if you can't see the difference between "eating dead non-human flesh" and "fucking live non-human flesh," no wonder the world's in such a state. It's sa'll 'bout consent, my nigga.Thor Kaufman wrote:I don't see the problem with zoophilia, except for the bigot american christnazi issue. People are eating burgers and stuff, go hunting seals with clubs etc.
Whatta cop-out. "Anti-judgement" is P.C.; only "judgement" is not accepted by mainstream society.Mismatch wrote:You, on the other hand, deserve to be offended, preaching morals and ethics to others; expecting them to live by your standards is not only wrong, it is also bloody annoying.
You, my dear cockgobbler, are no better than those you seek to judge.
F+
Halfway seriously, I don't understand what you are trying to tell, Telemachus.
First off, how does an animal consent? Does it? If so, how can we humans detect it? We probably can only see if it's hurt and crying or whatever. That would be after the child fell into the well, though.
Do you think, animals consent to be slaughtered and eaten? It probably begs for it, huh?
Also what's your second paragraph even supposed to mean, anti-judgement, accepted by mainstream society. wtf
I sure am with Thor on this one,
if a 'nimal gets hurt, ie: ruptured anus or summit, then its animal abuse or cruelty or whatever.
But if all they get is sex with a superior lifeform, then wtf.
Who cares.
I'd enjoy being some animal, getting fed and chit. And then a chick gomes and gives me a blowjob.
yay.
Animals tend to enjoy fucking anything.
Them bloody dogs hump whatever they find. Horses and donkeys tend to get it on.
And so forth.
They're only animals anyway, its not like have have any advanced thought processes and such.
if a 'nimal gets hurt, ie: ruptured anus or summit, then its animal abuse or cruelty or whatever.
But if all they get is sex with a superior lifeform, then wtf.
Who cares.
I'd enjoy being some animal, getting fed and chit. And then a chick gomes and gives me a blowjob.
yay.
Animals tend to enjoy fucking anything.
Them bloody dogs hump whatever they find. Horses and donkeys tend to get it on.
And so forth.
They're only animals anyway, its not like have have any advanced thought processes and such.