alright thenTinyTeeth wrote:Thread needs more praise for Hitler.
Frohe Weihnachten
What you leave out in this is that the game is 9 years old with graphics as outdated as fallout 1 was. And that they menaged to make uo real big at the time when nobody owned a broadband conection.About UO holding a substantial share of the audience, including more sales figures:
Quote:
Subscriber numbers peaked at around 250,000 in July of 2003, and to date sit around 135,000 subscribers (approximately 70,000 of which are Japanese). Ultima Online holds a 1.1% market share of massively multiplayer online game subscriptions.
You failed to note that they are mostly Japanese, one of the few games many can still play with outdated versions of Windows, and that the audience is not interested in a name-rape for long, especially after the original designers (Origin) are no longer around. Mostly, it's Japanese and White Trash Ninjas, the type of idiot that doesn't notice or care, and who apparently can't understand simple design concepts.
And this has relevance to something? I've entertained your UO bullshit for a bit, but the only thing it really proves is that game concepts are often horribly raped when changed from single-player to a MMOG environment. Your beloved article proved that at length, shitstain. It even said so almost verbatim, if you'd care to read it fully.Haris wrote: What you leave out in this is that the game is 9 years old with graphics as outdated as fallout 1 was.
You didn't NEED a broadband connection then, for even FPS games. Really, child, the levels you try to defend your weak-ass arguments becomes even more laughable. About the only thing you've managed to do is prove that UO did sell and is still around, though to an audience that really doesn't matter. The design, setting, and pretty much the entirety of UO doesn't have shit to do with Ultima except in name, it's been proven on Usenet on both the UO newsgroup as well as the UDIC newsgroup. EA hasn't been consistent in the butchering of the backstory for years. And if anyone knows anything about Ultima, it would be the UDIC.And that they menaged to make uo real big at the time when nobody owned a broadband conection.
And if ultima sold millions in 1990 as you claimed than it must have been reworked nes version cause in 1990 millions of people did not own pcs.
Child, what have I said about pulling bullshit from your ass? In 1990, millions of people DID have computers, and here's a clue (albeit flawed, since that is worldwide, and the US had a far higher saturation than the worldwide average - I'm just going by a safety figure on this...if I were to use American percentages, it would be even larger than 6.25 MIL). Cross it with this graph. With any competence at math, you'd arrive at a figure of around ~6.25 million PC users (around 125 million worldwide using a flat 5 BIL). Before the "world wide web" boomed in 95-97, and before Windows in general, so that means this is the pre-idiot time of gaming. ~6.25 million, and not using their PC to surf for porn, so that means it probably had some other use, like gaming. ~6.25 million in the US alone.I can buy those figure for games being sold for nes and snes in 90s. But pc games no chance.
Do you mean Rosh or Haris?S4ur0n27 wrote:Why don't you just unban him from NMA?
You know I was just kidding, ya big lug.Rosh wrote:Unfortunately for this example, I tend to hire people with a clue, who are able to spot the good points and flaws of games without personal bias, able to articulate their reasons coherently as well as understand simple concepts.
I'm sorry? Ruled? Were you banned? Abused? Special rank? Posts edited? Molested? None of those things happened, neither Ratty nor Sander, as far as I can recall, pressured you with their awesome "NMA staff" positions. So what's the problem? You disagreed with them, you argued, everyones' posts ended up in the vats when it became clear the thread was going nowhere and...then you left because you're not allowed to disagree? whoa, where did that come from?Frissy wrote:I'm not paranoid (or perhaps I am, but I'm sure those midgets are close...), but I've seen this "disagreedin" happening more and more, and with many people. It's also done by the same people who always do it, and always live under the full-enjoyment of "staff". Just because certain people are moderators or just plain simple god's doesn't mean they are all-knowing-fallout-gurus. Just because you've been there the forever doesn't mean you're right (all the time). In NMA it doesn't really matter if you know more, or less. The results have become the same. The idea of NMA, which again is ruled by a few.
Ozrat wrote:I haven't been so oppressed since prom in 9th grade.
Ruled/pressured by "staff" position: Yes, as you said. All the posts ended in the vats. A bit like Hitler and the Jews. "I disagree!" "SHOWER!!"Kharn wrote:I'm sorry? Ruled? Were you banned? Abused? Special rank? Posts edited? Molested? None of those things happened, neither Ratty nor Sander, as far as I can recall, pressured you with their awesome "NMA staff" positions. So what's the problem? You disagreed with them, you argued, everyones' posts ended up in the vats when it became clear the thread was going nowhere and...then you left because you're not allowed to disagree? whoa, where did that come from?
Dude. I'm the only NMAer posting here. Frissy left NMA, Rosh and haris are banned from the place.SuperH wrote:Why is this thread still going? The only people arguing are from NMA, maybe take it back to home base hombritos?
Ozrat wrote:I haven't been so oppressed since prom in 9th grade.