of course,
that's not what i said at all, perhaps you should stop taking things so literally?Haris wrote:Just saying that all fallout fans are not against this, no mather how much many of you on dac and nma want to belive that.
that's not what i said at all, perhaps you should stop taking things so literally?Haris wrote:Just saying that all fallout fans are not against this, no mather how much many of you on dac and nma want to belive that.
Then why are you posting news about every post apoc game in existance if its only "EXCLUSIVE" to Fallout?Kharn wrote:...frissy wrote:Amen! Someone who has a brain. It's starting to sound like There isn't anything Fallouty that anything other than Fallout 1(& 2 depending on the person). Even the Fallout setting is wrong/bad/etc. , unless it's used in Fallout 1 (& 2, depending on the person).
Fallout 1 and 2 *ARE* the relevant Fallout games that DaC and NMA are dedicated to. Don't go all Inclusivity Theorem on me now.
Did I ever use the word "exlusive"? I said "dedicated to". Does posting news make it dedicated to whatever the news is posted on? No. Don't be such a fucking moron, Snake.MR Snake wrote:Then why are you posting news about every post apoc game in existance if its only "EXCLUSIVE" to Fallout?
Ozrat wrote:I haven't been so oppressed since prom in 9th grade.
yes, right nowKharn wrote:Did I ever use the word "exlusive"?
yes.Kharn wrote:Does posting news make it dedicated to whatever the news is posted on?
Again I have to ask this question; who is this fucking clown and who does he think he's talking to?DaC-Sniper wrote:now leave. enough assholishmus already.
Learn to read, please. Or look up the definition of "dedicate to" and try to comprehend that it's not vaguely related to "exclusive to".Snake wrote:With this line you are saying that its fallout 1+2 or nothing. These are the only relevant games on the two sites and the sites are dedicated to only those two games.
Ozrat wrote:I haven't been so oppressed since prom in 9th grade.
Nope, that's how you read it, it's not what the sentence actually says. Which definition of "dedicated to" are you using, exactly? I bet that when a football game starts and it is dedicated to a certain player you expect that player to be the only guy on the field? Well done, Snake, well done.MR Snake wrote:The way you wrote dedicated to, in that exact sentance and post you wrote it in you made very clear that both nma and dac are exclusive to Fallout 1+2 and no other game, not even tactics.
Nope, I wrote a post explaining that since the site is dedicated to a pair of singleplayer games the interest in said singleplayer games is inherently higher than that of other types of games. You have yet to prove me wrong in any other way than misreading my words.MR Snake wrote:You wrote a post, in that post you claimed that because the sites originally were "dedicated" to the fallout game, that no other game is the same and its only the oroginal single player version of fallout that is to be discussed and therefor a multiplayer fallout or any other game in the PA setting is not what the site is or was ment for.
Says the guy who actually runs away from a site when he loses an argument? Don't make me laugh.frissy wrote:It's also quite fun to us to make a mockery out of you, and you actually let us do that with valid arguments and facts. We, the puppets..think not.
Missed this post. Atoga's reading is pretty dead-on.atoga wrote:swell guy please, stop forming analytical arguments from everything kharn says. just because he says NMA is "devoted to" FO doesn't mean it should tacitly report news directly related to FO and nothing else. do you think that when NMA was posting news about FOBOS it became devoted to FOBOS, and any less devoted to fallouts 1 and 2? of course not, and furthermore, FOBOS news was quite relevant to the future of FO games. if you fail to see the connection, you understand nothing.
True that.atoga wrote:even if he does take himself a bit too seriously
Ozrat wrote:I haven't been so oppressed since prom in 9th grade.