Ad blocker detected: Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker on our website.
TinyTeeth wrote:I simply meant that an argument which bases itself in that it may be theoretically applied to your cause would have to bear with that it might be to other causes as well.
Not with any authority, it couldn't. There is no comparison to smoking and pedophilia - smoking only damages the individual partaking, while pedophilia leaves lasting damage to a person who isn't legally or mentally able to give consent. The "it's my body so I'll do with it what I want to" argument fails by design when applied to pedophilia.
Also, stop writing novels. Your post could be whittled down to about four sentences.
You're right, I'll be shorter. So: Smoking in public doesn't. Also, who decides what is with authority? It seems to me that the French authorities are overruling just the reading that he did, how does it then help anyone but the French to refer to what is said with authority and what is not?
atoga wrote:so your point is...? i really followed very little of that
also, stop biting my vernacular, faget
What I meant to say is that you might be a jew and a homosexual and a landesverräter but you are my favourite one.