28 Weeks Later Trailer

Post by **King of Creation** » Tue Mar 27, 2007 10:24 pm

[ Film & TV -> Review ] - More info on <a href="#28 Weeks Later">Film & TV: 28 Weeks Later</a>

The trailer for 28 Weeks Later has hit the web. It definitely looks good. Check it out <a href="http://www.apple.com/trailers/fox_atomic/28weekslater/" target="_self">here</a> in various sizes, including High Def. And for those who don't know:<blockquote>
Directed by Juan Carlos Fresnadillo, the follow-up to 28 Days Later
stars Robert Carlyle, Rose Byrne, Jeremy Renner, Harold Perrineau,
Catherine McCormack, Imogen Poots, Idris Elba and Mackintosh Muggleton.

<a href="http://www.comingsoon.net/films.php?id=15427">28 Weeks Later</a> opens on May 11. </blockquote>Spotted @ <a href="http://www.comingsoon.net">Comingsoon.net</a>

Mad Max RW · Post by **Mad Max RW** » Tue Mar 27, 2007 10:58 pm

Looks pretty good. 28 Days later wasn't terrible, but I will never get used to running zombies.

I can't wait until the World War Z movie adaptation comes out. I'm reading the book right now and it's fucking awesome.

Post by **Dogmeatlives** » Wed Mar 28, 2007 12:02 am

Wow that trailer completely changed my mind about the movie. It looks really good. Can't wait to see it.

VasikkA · Post by **VasikkA** » Wed Mar 28, 2007 8:28 am

This was posted a week ago on the forums.

The first one was a good mix of an apocalypse movie and a zombie movie. Interestingly, many of the apoc movies are set in Britain or Australia.

Stainless · Post by **Stainless** » Wed Mar 28, 2007 10:12 am

Looks decent, although seems to be more zombie then post apoc from that trailer.

jetbaby · Post by **jetbaby** » Wed Mar 28, 2007 1:26 pm

Good christ, that's two apparently news worthy posts stolen from me. Assheads.

Stainless · Post by **Stainless** » Wed Mar 28, 2007 2:29 pm

shut up and go find us some more news

Smiley · Post by **Smiley** » Wed Mar 28, 2007 2:54 pm

I hope the kid dies. Horribly. And painfully.

I don't know why, but everything about it just screams "clichÃƒÂ©", even for a zombie movie(which I normally enjoy for its simplicity).

Mainly the "code red" soldier annoys me..

It'll give a "meh" at most.

jetbaby · Post by **jetbaby** » Wed Mar 28, 2007 3:03 pm

I give it four fuel-air bombs out of five. Mostly because I want to see some bitches die.

Smiley · Post by **Smiley** » Wed Mar 28, 2007 3:10 pm

Granted, the napalm does look sweet. But does anyone else get the feeling, that that's it?

jetbaby · Post by **jetbaby** » Wed Mar 28, 2007 3:18 pm

As long as the gratuitous violence is present, I guess I can part with seven fifty. Look on the bright side. Awesome new zombie movies, awesome sequel to Fallout, this is looking to be a great year!

Mr. Teatime · Post by **Mr. Teatime** » Wed Mar 28, 2007 5:03 pm

jetbaby, if you want permission to post news, all you have to do is ask... seriously. More (active) newsposters are more than welcome

jetbaby · Post by **jetbaby** » Wed Mar 28, 2007 5:08 pm

Sure, I'll take it. I don't care either way, but I'm all WTFLOL when things I post are OMG BIG NEWS EVARBUDDY the following day.

Post by **King of Creation** » Wed Mar 28, 2007 7:04 pm

If you think they're newsworthy posts, why don't you PM me about it?

jetbaby · Post by **jetbaby** » Wed Mar 28, 2007 11:35 pm

http://www.duckandcover.cx/forums/viewtopic.php?t=16841

Was a Submit News post about STALKER release until Urizen fucked it.

http://www.duckandcover.cx/forums/viewtopic.php?t=16937

Was 28 Weeks.

Super news.

philowar · Post by **philowar** » Wed Mar 28, 2007 11:46 pm

This movie is going to suck. Badly. Typical "the first one was pretty good so let's do another" scenario, where the end result ends up smelling like kack. Amateur acting, shitty plot. The first one was decent: not good, not bad, but worth watching once. This one will be less than mediocre even. Oh well.

S4ur0n27 · Post by **S4ur0n27** » Thu Mar 29, 2007 3:03 am

can i post news?

Post by **Dogmeatlives** » Thu Mar 29, 2007 4:07 am

The first one didn't have great acting aside from Murphy or a great plot. I think it looks pretty good.

philowar · Post by **philowar** » Thu Mar 29, 2007 7:43 am

Dogmeatlives wrote:The first one didn't have great acting aside from Murphy or a great plot. I think it looks pretty good.

I didn't say it did. I said it was OK, as in so-so, then proceeded to say this one will suck.

jetbaby · Post by **jetbaby** » Thu Mar 29, 2007 11:33 am

S4ur0n27 wrote:can i post news?

YAY SUSAN IS BACK