Watchmen the movie
Watchmen the movie
Who is down?
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0409459/
Casting looks like absolute shit, but I do love The Watchmen.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0409459/
Casting looks like absolute shit, but I do love The Watchmen.
off topic? OMG YOU'VE BEEN CENSORED... yet you're still posting. MYSTARY!!!!
Duck and Cover: THE site for all your Fallout needs
Duck and Cover: THE site for all your Fallout needs
This is the guy who took Dawn of the Dead, a brilliant critique on the excesses of consumer culture, and remade it (in itself an excess of consumer culture) WITHOUT the social commentary. The man is a philistine.
Also, take a look at his previous graphic novel adaptation 300, while there wasn't alot of depth to the source material there was plenty of room to work in an underlying message or theme to the film. The problem with Synder is his lack of understanding of the film medium to smuggle ideas, the fact of the matter is he has no idea there is any level to operate on aside from the superficial. 100% style, 0% substance, making him the absolute worst choice to direct one of the deeper and more critically acclaimed graphic novels in print.
I also think his lack of intelligence as a director is made incredibly obvious in his casting of hot young actors and actresses to play characters going through midlife crisis.
Goddamned awful jackass.
Also, take a look at his previous graphic novel adaptation 300, while there wasn't alot of depth to the source material there was plenty of room to work in an underlying message or theme to the film. The problem with Synder is his lack of understanding of the film medium to smuggle ideas, the fact of the matter is he has no idea there is any level to operate on aside from the superficial. 100% style, 0% substance, making him the absolute worst choice to direct one of the deeper and more critically acclaimed graphic novels in print.
I also think his lack of intelligence as a director is made incredibly obvious in his casting of hot young actors and actresses to play characters going through midlife crisis.
Goddamned awful jackass.
my vocabulary skills is above you.
Qfe.Aonaran wrote:This is the guy who took Dawn of the Dead, a brilliant critique on the excesses of consumer culture, and remade it (in itself an excess of consumer culture) WITHOUT the social commentary. The man is a philistine.
Also, take a look at his previous graphic novel adaptation 300, while there wasn't alot of depth to the source material there was plenty of room to work in an underlying message or theme to the film. The problem with Synder is his lack of understanding of the film medium to smuggle ideas, the fact of the matter is he has no idea there is any level to operate on aside from the superficial. 100% style, 0% substance, making him the absolute worst choice to direct one of the deeper and more critically acclaimed graphic novels in print.
I also think his lack of intelligence as a director is made incredibly obvious in his casting of hot young actors and actresses to play characters going through midlife crisis.
Goddamned awful jackass.
This Snyder guy is, indeed, one of the worst choices for director of Watchmen.
I brought this up in #fallout couple of weeks ago, back then Keanu Reeves was listed as rumoured for the part of Dr. Mahhattan. Fortunately, Keanu had sense enough to turn down the part.
Patric Wilson will play the part of Nite Owl... In the novel, Night Owl was in his mid forties (if I am not mistaken), this guy looks like he is barely out of his twenties.
Jude Law will play Ozymandias, which is ok, I guess.
A great actor -- looks-wise -- for the Rorschach part would be the guy who played Sandman(?) in Spiderman 3.
So far, this looks to be the Fo3 of the graphic-novel-to-movie-world. Watchmen is one of my all-time favourite stories, hope they don't fuck this one up aswell...
That actually isn't even the worst part, I was reading on ain't it cool or in some other publication where there were actually 20 somethings being cast in a handful of the other major roles. While it is possible that they would be the younger versions shown in flashback (which I doubt) they would still be far too young for the parts not to mention their inexperience and inappropriateness for the parts.
Edit: I just remembered I saw it on "the feed" because I was watching G4 for some damned reason
Edit: I just remembered I saw it on "the feed" because I was watching G4 for some damned reason
Last edited by Aonaran on Sat Jul 28, 2007 11:29 pm, edited 2 times in total.
my vocabulary skills is above you.
- Cthulhugoat
- Strider Elite
- Posts: 980
- Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2005 12:20 am
- Location: Land of big butts
- Mechanurgist
- Strider
- Posts: 733
- Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 6:09 am
- Location: Liminal State 2
- Contact:
Transmet got boring real fast, and the satire wasn't half as clever as reading a good book, like, say Fight Club.
Watchmen is an amazing, epic story, and there's absolutely no way anyone could properly turn it into a film. Francis Ford Coppola wouldn't be able to do this graphic novel justice; there's no way Snyder will do anything other than showcase some new digital effects and funky lighting. They'll probably spend a third of their budget modelling the giant tentacle monster, the asswipes.
Most importantly the threads of story in Watchmen were woven together using book scraps, film bits, interviews, memories, and extremely sophisticated cutup/flashback techniques. It would have to be a 6-hour movie to replicate that experience.
Watchmen is an amazing, epic story, and there's absolutely no way anyone could properly turn it into a film. Francis Ford Coppola wouldn't be able to do this graphic novel justice; there's no way Snyder will do anything other than showcase some new digital effects and funky lighting. They'll probably spend a third of their budget modelling the giant tentacle monster, the asswipes.
Most importantly the threads of story in Watchmen were woven together using book scraps, film bits, interviews, memories, and extremely sophisticated cutup/flashback techniques. It would have to be a 6-hour movie to replicate that experience.
Death: "Only one man can kill this many Russians. Bring his guitar to me!"
He was obviously influenced by Hunter S Thompson, I don't know any actor who could do a good job on him. I don't think Woody Harrelson would be able to do it.Redeye wrote:I always thought of Spider Jerusalem as a cross between Hunter Thompson and Alan Alda.
I always kinda associated Spider with my Ceramics teacher, because he pretty much looked exactly like him.
- Khan Noonien Singh
- Regular
- Posts: 60
- Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2007 5:10 am
- Location: Ceti Alpha V
-
- Hero of the Desert
- Posts: 1724
- Joined: Thu Apr 18, 2002 3:18 am
- Location: The Wastes
- Contact:
I was hoping Paul Greengrass would get the job but that fell through. I'll still be catching Snyder's take. If I had any criticism of 300 it would be that it was too slavishly devoted to the source material. If he keeps that up for Watchmen, we'll be ok.
The answer to your first question is shaddup.
The bleeding heart facet.Khan Noonien Singh wrote:...
How, exactly, is Spider Jerusalem like Alan Alda? Do you mean Alan Arkin? Even that I don't quite see.
Nice counterpoint to the other parts.
And some randomness.