Fallout 3?

fallout ranger · Post by **fallout ranger** » Thu Dec 06, 2007 10:39 pm

PC-Gamer wrote:to aim for a mutant's head, and if the shot lands, you'll notice his slow-motion decapitation

WHAT

THE

FUCK

PiP · Post by **PiP** » Thu Dec 06, 2007 11:41 pm

Aonaran wrote:I find it hard to admit but the regular SMs actually look worse:

Spotted @ NMA:

http://www.nma-fallout.com/forum/album_ ... ic_id=2591
http://www.nma-fallout.com/forum/album_ ... ic_id=2592

Looks like Mr. Fantastic used The Thing as a kleenex. Awful, just awful.

I actually like the mutant in this pic. WAY better than what it looked like at the 'VATS targeting at supermutant' screenshot.

fallout ranger · Post by **fallout ranger** » Thu Dec 06, 2007 11:43 pm

My thoughts exactly, but why it has no hair escapes me...

Aonaran · Post by **Aonaran** » Fri Dec 07, 2007 12:06 am

PiP wrote:better

Did you see his buddy on the left?

PiP · Post by **PiP** » Fri Dec 07, 2007 1:00 pm

perhaps that one has more silly armour here and there but still 300x more Fallout style than the uberzombie from the vats screen

VasikkA · Post by **VasikkA** » Fri Dec 07, 2007 2:06 pm

The main problem with the super mutant in that screenshot is that it shouldn't be there in the first place. Whatever it looks like or is doing is irrelevant.

Aonaran · Post by **Aonaran** » Fri Dec 07, 2007 3:36 pm

It seems like with each screenshot released the mutie armor gets more and more ridiculous. While I hated the VATS mutant I actually really dug the armor as well as the armor on the one pictured in your avatar. Lately, however, it is just getting absurd.

S4ur0n27 · Post by **S4ur0n27** » Sat Dec 08, 2007 4:55 pm

Lately, just getting absurd? You probably missed a few news posts since, uh, a year.

Aonaran · Post by **Aonaran** » Sun Dec 09, 2007 5:14 am

S4ur0n27 wrote:Lately, just getting absurd? You probably missed a few news posts since, uh, a year.

Note my specificity when I said "armor." But yeah, the game is fucked.

cazsim83 · Post by **cazsim83** » Mon Dec 10, 2007 3:03 am

Well, to answer a question on the last page - the reason these look lower-res than Oblivion is pretty simple, and exactly what Bethesda wanted - they bought a franchise with a built-in fanbase (of course not knowing how rabid we are) that would branch them out of their TES games - same thing they did with DC of the E (CoC) they dont' have to work out a story, they dont' have to work out background, atmosphere, etc etc etc - all they have to do is tack on graphics to a ready-made game.
Very little work (comparatively), with a lot of return on the investment.

I still say what I said in the beginning - F3 will do well, because console kiddies will buy it (or their mummies and daddies will). It may even do alright on the PC, as there are plenty of (not) Fallout fans who will buy it just to see the story, and maybe relive a few good moments.

Bethesda isn't in it for the fans anymore (if they ever were, which I doubt) they are in for one reason only - money. Capitalism at it's finest. With all the hate going towards Bethesda, shouldn't some of it go to Herve or Black I....oh....I mean Interplay? They were the ones who sold it so they could finance a (possibly) shitty MMORPG......

entertainer · Post by **entertainer** » Mon Dec 10, 2007 10:16 pm

It's all about making money.
I expect Fallout 4 about one year after F3 release.

Nameless_One · Post by **Nameless_One** » Tue Dec 11, 2007 10:06 am

entertainer wrote:It's all about making money.
I expect Fallout 4 about one year after F3 release.

I want the drug that you are currently using!

Dreadnought · Post by **Dreadnought** » Tue Dec 11, 2007 2:42 pm

Nameless_One wrote:
entertainer wrote:It's all about making money.
I expect Fallout 4 about one year after F3 release.
I want the drug that you are currently using!

Shut up. Cunt.

He's right with that.
But he forgot the Fallout 3 expansion for only US$ 79,95 with 2 new towns and a whole set of new realistic weapons. Retro 80s style. It shoots <strike>HIV</strike> FEV and turns everything into living nuclear explosions. You meet Orlando Bloom and in the end they fully set it up for the second expansion, a la Half Life Episodes. Intro music by Culture Club.

Nameless_One · Post by **Nameless_One** » Wed Dec 12, 2007 4:07 pm

Dreadnought wrote:
Nameless_One wrote:
entertainer wrote:It's all about making money.
I expect Fallout 4 about one year after F3 release.
I want the drug that you are currently using!

Shut up. Cunt.

He's right with that.
But he forgot the Fallout 3 expansion for only US$ 79,95 with 2 new towns and a whole set of new realistic weapons. Retro 80s style. It shoots <strike>HIV</strike> FEV and turns everything into living nuclear explosions. You meet Orlando Bloom and in the end they fully set it up for the second expansion, a la Half Life Episodes. Intro music by Culture Club.

You made some SENSE about this matter with your perspective, makes sense as the word of 'cunt' that you used for me, heh...we`ll see that releases

entertainer · Post by **entertainer** » Fri Dec 28, 2007 4:10 pm

what ya say what ya say what ya say what

entertainer · Post by **entertainer** » Wed Jan 09, 2008 6:54 pm

''Fallout 3'' (Bethesda Softworks): The long-awaited continuation of the classic post-apocalyptic role-playing series was the best-looking thing at last year's E3 trade show. If it's as good as Bethesda's ''The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion,'' it will be a Game of the Year contender.

Dreadnought · Post by **Dreadnought** » Wed Jan 09, 2008 7:22 pm

Rectangular!

Yes.

entertainer · Post by **entertainer** » Wed Jan 09, 2008 9:45 pm

Oh well...

Post by **Dogmeatlives** » Wed Jan 09, 2008 9:48 pm

18th century dildos?

POOPERSCOOPER · Post by **POOPERSCOOPER** » Wed Jan 09, 2008 11:36 pm

The new concept art looks more steam punkish than it should be.