Blade Runner: The Final Cut

Talk about music, movies, TV, books, other types of entertainment and what your vices are. Also, if you're addicted to the high you get off Aspirin, this is the place to talk about it.
User avatar
fallout ranger
Hero of the Glowing Lands
Hero of the Glowing Lands
Posts: 2205
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 5:26 am
Location: Shady sands (no really!!)
Contact:

Post by fallout ranger »

I like the movie for the movie, not for what anyone else thinks of it.
does this work
User avatar
AnneGwish
Vault Veteran
Vault Veteran
Posts: 250
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 1:22 pm

Post by AnneGwish »

I watched it for the first time a few weeks back, when the only thing that ever really got mentioned anymore was the name, but I enjoyed it, being what it was. I have a fondness for noir-styled flicks though. They tend to be better done than a standard action flick, from a visual standpoint.
"If you could be God's worst enemy, or nothing, which would you choose?" -Fight Club

"God made me a cannibal to fix problems like you" -Angelspit
User avatar
S4ur0n27
Mamma's Gang member
Mamma's Gang member
Posts: 15172
Joined: Sat Jun 01, 2002 10:14 am
Contact:

Post by S4ur0n27 »

lol
User avatar
Aonaran
Striding Hero
Striding Hero
Posts: 1261
Joined: Wed May 25, 2005 8:02 pm

Post by Aonaran »

johnnygothisgun wrote:
Aonaran wrote:Instead it presented itself as the ultimate achievement in Science Fiction film and to me it just came across as arrogant and unwarranted.
i think youre projecting the reputation onto the movie, and its silly
You can't honestly tell me that film doesn't take itself VERY seriously. But no, I'm not projecting onto the film, the film projects onto the audience. The image it projects is "THIS IS SERIOUS BUSINESS, WE'VE GOT CRYING ROBOTS, DOVES AND A RAIN MACHINE!". At best it's mildly amusing camp trying to pawn itself off as high art. How that generated a public gullible enough to buy 4 different cuts on as many as 5 different formats over the many years only speaks further towards its audience.
my vocabulary skills is above you.
User avatar
Thor Kaufman
Mamma's Gang member
Mamma's Gang member
Posts: 5082
Joined: Mon Dec 16, 2002 11:56 am
Contact:

Post by Thor Kaufman »

Aonaran wrote:
johnnygothisgun wrote:
Aonaran wrote:Instead it presented itself as the ultimate achievement in Science Fiction film and to me it just came across as arrogant and unwarranted.
i think youre projecting the reputation onto the movie, and its silly
You can't honestly tell me that film doesn't take itself VERY seriously. But no, I'm not projecting onto the film, the film projects onto the audience. The image it projects is "THIS IS SERIOUS BUSINESS, WE'VE GOT CRYING ROBOTS, DOVES AND A RAIN MACHINE!". At best it's mildly amusing camp trying to pawn itself off as high art. How that generated a public gullible enough to buy 4 different cuts on as many as 5 different formats over the many years only speaks further towards its audience.
I don't think the film takes itself seriously. The actors are all joke(r)s and many of the lines are extremely corny.
User avatar
johnnygothisgun
Hero of the Desert
Hero of the Desert
Posts: 1522
Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2003 10:13 pm

Post by johnnygothisgun »

Aonaran wrote:
johnnygothisgun wrote:
Aonaran wrote:Instead it presented itself as the ultimate achievement in Science Fiction film and to me it just came across as arrogant and unwarranted.
i think youre projecting the reputation onto the movie, and its silly
You can't honestly tell me that film doesn't take itself VERY seriously. But no, I'm not projecting onto the film, the film projects onto the audience. The image it projects is "THIS IS SERIOUS BUSINESS, WE'VE GOT CRYING ROBOTS, DOVES AND A RAIN MACHINE!". At best it's mildly amusing camp trying to pawn itself off as high art. How that generated a public gullible enough to buy 4 different cuts on as many as 5 different formats over the many years only speaks further towards its audience.
he he he okeydabey
User avatar
Jeff
Mamma's Gang member
Mamma's Gang member
Posts: 5442
Joined: Thu Apr 18, 2002 7:05 pm
Location: The Outernet

Post by Jeff »

Aonaran wrote:You can't honestly tell me that film doesn't take itself VERY seriously. But no, I'm not projecting onto the film, the film projects onto the audience. The image it projects is "THIS IS SERIOUS BUSINESS, WE'VE GOT CRYING ROBOTS, DOVES AND A RAIN MACHINE!". At best it's mildly amusing camp trying to pawn itself off as high art. How that generated a public gullible enough to buy 4 different cuts on as many as 5 different formats over the many years only speaks further towards its audience.
100% same could be said about teh robocop imo. except for crying, robo is too tuff for tha.t
User avatar
Wolfman Walt
Mamma's Gang member
Mamma's Gang member
Posts: 5243
Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2003 1:31 pm
Location: La Grange, Kentucky
Contact:

Post by Wolfman Walt »

Don't most films take themselves seriousily? I don't remember too many "ha-ha" moments during the Godfather or Raging Bull.
User avatar
cazsim83
250 Posts til Somewhere
250 Posts til Somewhere
Posts: 2978
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 5:23 pm

Post by cazsim83 »

I thought the only movies that didn't really take themselves seriously were the "That Teen Movie" stuff and "Scary Movie 13" and things like that.

I didn't think Blade Runner "took itself seriously" - I thought it was very well done, Harrison Ford and .. .eh...not Yule Brenner...damn....stupid drug addled memory.....the main "evil" robot - whatever the blonde guy that *spoiler* dies at the end....whatever.

I thought they were excellent actors - and everything played together very well, even the creepy introvert who made robotic toys and such.

Very "Shadowrun" feeling - perfect for what they were trying to do.

Five of Five stars.
User avatar
Smiley
Righteous Subjugator
Righteous Subjugator
Posts: 3186
Joined: Thu Apr 18, 2002 11:20 pm
Location: Denmark. Smiley-land.
Contact:

Post by Smiley »

Blade Runner as everything else old and "at that time revolutionary", will always seem dull in the present.
Pure nostalgia, and I like it.
Testicular Pugilist
User avatar
Nameless_One
Desert Wanderer
Desert Wanderer
Posts: 538
Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2007 1:53 pm
Location: Nowhere

Post by Nameless_One »

Smiley wrote:Blade Runner as everything else old and "at that time revolutionary", will always seem dull in the present.
Pure nostalgia, and I like it.
I`m with Smiley at this.Especially at ''at that time revolutionary'' part.This movie gave a path to its own genre.
User avatar
PiP
Last, Best Hope of Humanity
Last, Best Hope of Humanity
Posts: 5027
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2003 1:25 am
Location: Brighton beach
Contact:

Post by PiP »

Smiley wrote:Blade Runner as everything else old and "at that time revolutionary", will always seem dull in the present.
Pure nostalgia, and I like it.
I have no idea what was revolutionary about Blade R. "at that time"; I like it because it's a sci-fi theme film which is not a made-for-popcorn-crowd colourful flick with cool FX and pompous acting. The overall "tired" tone is somewhat appealing to me. Some scenes - like Leon's interrogation - are great. Hauer's character - android struggling with different emotions in him - is quite interesting. I don't mind the doves and stuff. In this moment of impending death he gets poetical - like so many men when they take the time to reflect on their fate. It's only as pretentious as all domestic poets (and who's never tried to write a poem at some point?).
Disclaimer: I don't remember the film really well; need to re-watch it.

The film "at that time revolutionary" that I watched was Metropolis, and I was disappointed. I only liked some stage design.
User avatar
Thor Kaufman
Mamma's Gang member
Mamma's Gang member
Posts: 5082
Joined: Mon Dec 16, 2002 11:56 am
Contact:

Post by Thor Kaufman »

I think Hauer was just hired to be badass, no one buys into his emo personality that sometimes breaches through his hardcoreness in BR, I fink.

Also, of course BR is an 80s movie which is also reflected in its art, but the film still conveys a good atmosphere which is what counts and it doesn't consist of fuckin cgi. CGI looks synthetic for the most part and totally pales in comparison so I dont see your point about evolution in film regarding graffiixx, more like a regress. Give me a Terminator I robot stopmotion animation anytime over some fuckin stupid bullet-time shit computeranimation.

BR may not be a masterpiece like Dune, but it's still well worth watching. :nerdrage:
User avatar
PiP
Last, Best Hope of Humanity
Last, Best Hope of Humanity
Posts: 5027
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2003 1:25 am
Location: Brighton beach
Contact:

Post by PiP »

Thor Kaufman wrote: so I dont see your point about evolution in film regarding graffiixx, more like a regress.
if you're talking to me, I never meant graphics' evolution :?
User avatar
Thor Kaufman
Mamma's Gang member
Mamma's Gang member
Posts: 5082
Joined: Mon Dec 16, 2002 11:56 am
Contact:

Post by Thor Kaufman »

I don't know who I'm talking to, but someone mentioned the stage equipment(?) of BR iirc, but maybe not

What kind of evolution are you talking about
User avatar
Aonaran
Striding Hero
Striding Hero
Posts: 1261
Joined: Wed May 25, 2005 8:02 pm

Post by Aonaran »

DP for good luck, kids!
Last edited by Aonaran on Wed Feb 20, 2008 10:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
my vocabulary skills is above you.
User avatar
Aonaran
Striding Hero
Striding Hero
Posts: 1261
Joined: Wed May 25, 2005 8:02 pm

Post by Aonaran »

Gimp Mask wrote:
Aonaran wrote:You can't honestly tell me that film doesn't take itself VERY seriously. But no, I'm not projecting onto the film, the film projects onto the audience. The image it projects is "THIS IS SERIOUS BUSINESS, WE'VE GOT CRYING ROBOTS, DOVES AND A RAIN MACHINE!". At best it's mildly amusing camp trying to pawn itself off as high art. How that generated a public gullible enough to buy 4 different cuts on as many as 5 different formats over the many years only speaks further towards its audience.
100% same could be said about teh robocop imo. except for crying, robo is too tuff for tha.t
Robocop knows it's camp and relishes in it. Blade Runner pulls out the smoke machine and tries to convince you it's being deep even when hurling the most blatant of action movie cliches directly in your face. While you, Citizen J. Internet, claim they are the same, it doesn't take a side by side, frame by frame analysis to realize one of these things is NOT like the other.

Case in point: "I'd buy that for a dollar!" and a million other satyrical comments on media saturation that are absolutely goddamn side-splitting vs. "TIME TO DIE" or "TEARS IN THE RAIN". Or how about the themes, the search for societal and individual identity in the wake of the military industrial complex vs. "do robots have feelings?". I'm sorry but even Japanese Anime does that tired shit better.
User avatar
Caleb
Strider
Strider
Posts: 724
Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 7:40 am
Location: Seattle, WA

Post by Caleb »

I love the movie...however, unless they finally sort out all the tripe and a new version comes out endorsed by scott, i won't by it. Along those lines...they cut out enough from the book to make BR its own movie unto itself - it does not deserve to be linked with the book, which was thoroughly amazing...
User avatar
PiP
Last, Best Hope of Humanity
Last, Best Hope of Humanity
Posts: 5027
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2003 1:25 am
Location: Brighton beach
Contact:

Post by PiP »

Aonaran wrote:Case in point: "I'd buy that for a dollar!" and a million other satyrical comments on media saturation that are absolutely goddamn side-splitting vs. "TIME TO DIE" or "TEARS IN THE RAIN"
Blade R. is not about "media saturation" but more about dying.
.
Or how about the themes, the search for societal and individual identity in the wake of the military industrial complex vs. "do robots have feelings?". I'm sorry but even Japanese Anime does that tired shit better.
really? you got me genuinely interested. Because "I Will Smith" was a fucking joke btw.
User avatar
Nameless_One
Desert Wanderer
Desert Wanderer
Posts: 538
Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2007 1:53 pm
Location: Nowhere

Post by Nameless_One »

Thor Kaufman wrote:I don't know who I'm talking to, but someone mentioned the stage equipment(?) of BR iirc, but maybe not

What kind of evolution are you talking about
:lol:
Post Reply