FO1 vs. FO2
Yeah well, I guess they'd do that, rape the women. I don't think they would slaughter everyone, there wouldn't be anything left to loot next time!
And I don't think they're just wandering and randomly raiding towns and hitting caravans. Raiders are organized and they have their own strongholds and leaders.
And I don't think they're just wandering and randomly raiding towns and hitting caravans. Raiders are organized and they have their own strongholds and leaders.
- Warlord
- Vault Veteran
- Posts: 310
- Joined: Thu May 16, 2002 3:52 pm
- Location: The Deepest level of Pain
klamath has more or less the same number of people shady sands had in fallout 1 ...
but they had a G.E.C.K.. That's what Klamath didn't have. So Shady got the walls from Geck and Klamath...Shady Sands also came from a vault and they had ver little technology ...
Also, i don't think the Den people would want to raid Klamath as it is Den's trading partner, well sort of
Dah! Why Klamath has Trappers? To seek and kill the beasts near and maybe get some profit from doing it.There are all kinds of creatures that would try to attack klamath , radscorpions , geckos and other beasts .
Just near Klamath(one or two squares, that's near) are no Raiders, but tribals, cannibals etc. I'm pretty sure the Trappers can kill a few cannibals.How can you say there are no raiders in klamath
The raider are starts near Den, although Klamath is pretty near Den, raiders are not present in the near area of Klamath( again, one or two squares)
and Shady didn't have much more defense than Klamath. They had a wall and a few guards. I think there were less guards in Shady, than there are Trappers in Klamath.
- May the blood of thine enemies stain the ground -