New Trailer Released for Terminator 4: Megatron

POOPERSCOOPER · Post by **POOPERSCOOPER** » Wed Mar 04, 2009 5:36 pm

[ Film & TV -> Update ]

The trailer looks alright and it reveals a lot more about the story than the previous one. We can only hope the movie is good, I don't know how to embed the video so you will just have to follow this link. <a target="_self" href="http://www.comingsoon.net/news/terminat ... 72">CLICKE HERE. </a> They should have chosen me for the role of John Connor or the Terminator.
Spotted @ <a href="http://www.comingsoon.net">Comingsoon.net</a>

VasikkA · Post by **VasikkA** » Wed Mar 04, 2009 8:43 pm

Looks horrible.

Post by **Dogmeatlives** » Wed Mar 04, 2009 10:33 pm

VasikkA wrote:Looks horrible.

Post by **Manoil** » Wed Mar 04, 2009 11:30 pm

I'm willing to give it a chance. Besides, as long as I'm still getting in free, I'm not loosing anything but time.

Jesus Christ · Post by **Jesus Christ** » Thu Mar 05, 2009 2:50 am

I've been waiting for this one since T2. I really hope the it doesn't suck.

Aonaran · Post by **Aonaran** » Thu Mar 05, 2009 2:54 am

Could be interesting but it isn't James Cameron. That is enough to almost certainly guarantee fail.

Redeye · Post by **Redeye** » Thu Mar 05, 2009 4:02 am

Crap crap crap-crapulous

The adaptation of the Claw Concept for terror and extraction of people from defensive positions does make some sense, but making such huge H-Ks is a huge waste of resources.

Also it appears that Skynet has anti-grav or some bullshit like that.

Also: Tough Guy Shit

God Dam It

Why?

The human survivors should be stealthy sappers, not Rambo wannabees.

Aonaran · Post by **Aonaran** » Thu Mar 05, 2009 4:15 am

Redeye wrote:Crap crap crap-crapulous

The adaptation of the Claw Concept for terror and extraction of people from defensive positions does make some sense, but making such huge H-Ks is a huge waste of resources.

Also it appears that Skynet has anti-grav or some bullshit like that.

Also: Tough Guy Shit

God Dam It

Why?

The human survivors should be stealthy sappers, not Rambo wannabees.

Skynet also appears to have gotten a hold of Liberty Prime.

Kashluk · Post by **Kashluk** » Thu Mar 05, 2009 6:21 am

It looked great to me.

Blargh · Post by **Blargh** » Thu Mar 05, 2009 7:11 am

I have yet to view any of the Terminator films. Ha.

Post by **Dogmeatlives** » Thu Mar 05, 2009 8:09 am

Aonaran wrote:Could be interesting but it isn't James Cameron.

More importantly it is McG

Post by **Manoil** » Thu Mar 05, 2009 6:16 pm

Blargh wrote:I have yet to view any of the Terminator films. Ha.

WOW. If that's a serious statement... I dunno-- the first two were powerful, but Nick Stahl and T3 were so anticlimactic for the series that it turned into an enormous buzzkill for... well, just about every fan of the series.
Metaphorically similiar, but not nearly as massive a downfall as FO:BOS for the PS2.

Post by **Dogmeatlives** » Thu Mar 05, 2009 6:35 pm

Manoil wrote:
Blargh wrote:I have yet to view any of the Terminator films. Ha.
WOW. If that's a serious statement... I dunno-- the first two were powerful, but Nick Stahl and T3 were so anticlimactic for the series that it turned into an enormous buzzkill for... well, just about every fan of the series.
Metaphorically similiar, but not nearly as massive a downfall as FO:BOS for the PS2.

Were you really expecting T3 to not suck? It was obviously a cashgrab. Blargh, you really should see the second one if nothing else. Its certainly one of the greatest sci fi/action flicks ever. the first one is alright but you can probably skip it.

St. Toxic · Post by **St. Toxic** » Thu Mar 05, 2009 9:43 pm

Dogmeatlives wrote:you really should see the second one if nothing else. Its certainly one of the greatest sci fi/action flicks ever. the first one is alright but you can probably skip it.

What? No.

Redeye · Post by **Redeye** » Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:06 pm

Dogmeatlives wrote:...
Were you really expecting T3 to not suck? It was obviously a cashgrab. Blargh, you really should see the second one if nothing else. Its certainly one of the greatest sci fi/action flicks ever. the first one is alright but you can probably skip it.

Yeah, T3 sucked.

I like T1 the best- so absolutely tight.

T2 was technically superior by a wide margin, but had a wee bit of cheese.
Showing the transformed Sarah Connor was awesome.
Watch the cut sections to see how bad T2 could have been.

Thor Kaufman · Post by **Thor Kaufman** » Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:45 pm

Go for the first one, not the faggy second one.

Post by **Manoil** » Fri Mar 06, 2009 1:42 am

As always the capitulator, Thor.

POOPERSCOOPER · Post by **POOPERSCOOPER** » Fri Mar 06, 2009 6:19 am

St. Toxic wrote:
Dogmeatlives wrote:you really should see the second one if nothing else. Its certainly one of the greatest sci fi/action flicks ever. the first one is alright but you can probably skip it.
What? No.

I think you could pretty easily skip T1 and go straight to T2 and still really enjoy it and get the story except for maybe Kyle Reese. James Cameron kind of did the same thing with Aliens. T2 was almost like a remake of T1 anyways with some new additions.

If your questioning T2's greatness then your wrong flat out.

Post by **Manoil** » Fri Mar 06, 2009 9:28 am

T2 and Aliens were almost the same story.

-Past nightmare comes back into the main character's life
-Weak female figure becomes warrior woman
-Enemy seems defeated but unexpected secondary climactic battle occurrs

Cameron's good, no doubt, but even he has the tendency to act in repetition.

ApTyp · Post by **ApTyp** » Sat Mar 07, 2009 2:22 pm