Antichrist

Talk about music, movies, TV, books, other types of entertainment and what your vices are. Also, if you're addicted to the high you get off Aspirin, this is the place to talk about it.
Post Reply
User avatar
St. Toxic
Haha you're still not there yet
Haha you're still not there yet
Posts: 3378
Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2004 3:20 am
Location: One-man religion.
Contact:

Antichrist

Post by St. Toxic »

Just saw it.

Pros: Excellent camera-work, great sound, good use of high-speed cameras.

Cons: Plot, Charlotte Gainsbourg, Freudian psycho-babble, von Trier stroking his ego.

Plot summary: Through the death of his son, psychologist husband finds out that his neurotic wife suffers from a deeply rooted violent psychosis. Sadly, two things make this discovery an uncomfortable one:

1) He's alone with her in a forest cabin, far from civilization.
2) He's too PC to slap some sense into her.

Oh yeah, spoiler alert.

Now, there's alot of things in this movie to be annoyed about, even if you do enjoy pretentious, artsy high-brow drama.

-There's barrels of visually documented sex in the movie. I'd say half the movie is sex, but that might be because it's shot and presented in a very dominating way, and since story progression is lacking the sex-acts tend to take over. The representation of the act itself is an undecided mix between classical Hollywood jewmance and Feminist porn, which is the perfect mix to bug the living shit out of me.

-Gainsbourg's voice, and eventually her face and body made me cringe. Chiefly British accent that sounds unnatural and pretentious (although, it should be natural, her being born in London and all) droning on without any emotion for two long hours, as she visually detours into madness, made my head hurt. Then, having constant facial close-ups and a whopping ton of nude-shots, and I began to hate her physically as well. Maybe it was the part she played, but I rather think I saw through that and simply saw her as she was, the type of woman against which I'm instinctively biased.

-Von Trier constantly breaking the golden rules of film-making. It's fine for attention-grabbing once or twice, but come on. You need to have at least some consistency in the shots, otherwise it distracts the viewer from the event or conversation that's taking place. Keeping track of the timeline as characters and cameras are constantly switching places, characters talking out of turns, needless shots coming between events, necessery shots being left out -- why not just put everything together in a random order, eh? That'd be really artsy.

-You can tell straight away it's a movie intended to fellate film-students and really pretentious cunts. While they may have a field-day with this, I, in turn, have not. :sadche:

So, what do you guys think? :chew:
User avatar
VasikkA
No more Tuna
No more Tuna
Posts: 8703
Joined: Sat Jun 15, 2002 6:14 pm

Post by VasikkA »

Downloaded it, watched it for 5 mins, fast forwarded a bit and came to the conclusion the movie was too artfag to be taken seriously. The artfagness is just too intentional; Lynch manages to be more subtle. Needless to say, it found a new home in my trash bin.
User avatar
Dogmeatlives
Living Legend
Living Legend
Posts: 3193
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 5:35 am
Location: Junktown, Phil's doorstep

Post by Dogmeatlives »

Word on the street is that she gets bloody jizz on her after beating Willem dafoe's genitals with a piece of wood... I don't think I could watch that bit :lalala:
Wasteland Radio, with Charlie C.
Blargh
Ãœberkommando
Ãœberkommando
Posts: 6303
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2003 7:11 pm

Post by Blargh »

HELLO GENTLEMEN HAVE YOU PERCHANCE HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO VIEW THE FILM ANTICHRIST ?

WHY N -

IS THAT THE ONE WITH THE BLUDGEONING OF THE GENITALIA AND THE BLOOD FLECKED SEMENAL FLUID ?

W -

YES.

. . .

I AM MAKING A BOOKING.





*laughs*

Wonderful. :drunk:
User avatar
Tingel Tangel
Fascist Bitch
Fascist Bitch
Posts: 760
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 11:06 am
Location: On my feet

Post by Tingel Tangel »

Being a Dane, I should have watched this when it was out here. I didn't. Now I'm labeled as uncool.
User avatar
rad resistance
Striding Hero
Striding Hero
Posts: 1435
Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2008 3:56 am
Location: Penn's Woods

Post by rad resistance »

bloody jizz what the fuck?!
Cow Cud is a twin.
User avatar
Retlaw83
Goatse Messiah
Goatse Messiah
Posts: 5326
Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2004 1:49 am

Post by Retlaw83 »

Tingel Tangel wrote:Being a Dane, I should have watched this when it was out here. I didn't. Now I'm labeled as uncool.
No, you're labelled as uncool because you're the only one who likes Smiley.
"You're going to have a tough time doing that without your head, palooka."
- the Vault Dweller
User avatar
Retlaw83
Goatse Messiah
Goatse Messiah
Posts: 5326
Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2004 1:49 am

Post by Retlaw83 »

rad resistance wrote:bloody jizz what the fuck?!
I'm sure you've had enough in your butt to recognize it.
"You're going to have a tough time doing that without your head, palooka."
- the Vault Dweller
User avatar
Manoil
Wastelander's Nightmare
Wastelander's Nightmare
Posts: 3701
Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2006 12:05 pm
Location: Drifting Onward

Post by Manoil »

Retlaw83 wrote:
rad resistance wrote:bloody jizz what the fuck?!
I'm sure you've had enough in your butt to recognize it.
:highfive:
User avatar
PiP
Last, Best Hope of Humanity
Last, Best Hope of Humanity
Posts: 5027
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2003 1:25 am
Location: Brighton beach
Contact:

Post by PiP »

thanks for the spoiler alert fucker :gnasher:
User avatar
Tingel Tangel
Fascist Bitch
Fascist Bitch
Posts: 760
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 11:06 am
Location: On my feet

Post by Tingel Tangel »

Retlaw83 wrote: No, you're labelled as uncool because you're the only one who likes Smiley.
*applauds originality*

No. Really. I'm not being sarcastic.
User avatar
Superhaze
Hero of the Desert
Hero of the Desert
Posts: 1686
Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 4:21 am
Location: Far north

Post by Superhaze »

You should be. :eyebrow:
User avatar
Megatron
Mamma's Gang member
Mamma's Gang member
Posts: 8030
Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2002 1:00 am
Location: The United Kingdoms

Post by Megatron »

I quite liked it. I had avoided most reviews/previews/hype beforehand besides hearing it was OH GOD HORRIBLE. But to view it just, stand-alone is quite goodt I reckon, as you should do any other movie. Though I also really like forests and personificationilizationió so I dug that bit.

If anything I struggled with the violence, which wasn't that bad altogether. Though I think by not being visually over-the-top while mentally being ridiculous was a good mix maybe. I'd recommend it to some people, though I don't really know anyone who'd actually enjoy it IRL who isn't a hipster fuckface or went in expecting some kind of arty 'saw' film. It's more along the lines of the exorcist or blue velvet.
:chew:
User avatar
St. Toxic
Haha you're still not there yet
Haha you're still not there yet
Posts: 3378
Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2004 3:20 am
Location: One-man religion.
Contact:

Post by St. Toxic »

PiP wrote:thanks for the spoiler alert fucker :gnasher:
Hey, at least I bothered enough to put one in there et allé. :flamed:
Post Reply