Interplay Files 8K - Claims Victory In Court

Post by **Retlaw83** » Fri Dec 18, 2009 8:17 pm

Brother None wrote: Roofles. Why do you lie? Perhaps you need to read up on modern discourse analysis, starting with John Austin's authoritative work on performative and constative acts. OHLOLZ. PWNT!

You used the word constative wrong. Perhaps you should read a dictionary.

I also noticed you're posting here instead of sucking my balls. Snap to, douchebag.

you love me.

No, I just want you to suck my balls.

Brother None · Post by **Brother None** » Sat Dec 19, 2009 2:27 am

Retlaw83 wrote:You used the word constative wrong. Perhaps you should read a dictionary.

Roofles. Considering I have read the works of the man who is considered to be responsible for the base concept of a "constative-performative" act dichotomy, I don't think a dictionary can teach me anything I don't already know.

Here's a thought; perhaps dictionaries are made to give broad, sweeping, summed up generalized meaning to such analytical concepts as constative that are not necessarily useful to those of us who are actually familiar with the analytical base?

ROOFLES.

Post by **Retlaw83** » Sat Dec 19, 2009 3:07 am

Brother None wrote: Roofles. Considering I have read the works of the man who is considered to be responsible for the base concept of a "constative-performative" act dichotomy, I don't think a dictionary can teach me anything I don't already know.

Interesting statement from a man who knows nothing.

And what self-respecting adult says roofles, or posts on a forum that has achievements?

Here's a thought; perhaps dictionaries are made to give broad, sweeping, summed up generalized meaning to such analytical concepts as constative that are not necessarily useful to those of us who are actually familiar with the analytical base?

Here's a thought - you used the word incorrectly and need to suck my balls.

Brother None · Post by **Brother None** » Sat Dec 19, 2009 5:28 pm

Retlaw83 wrote:Interesting statement from a man who knows nothing.

And what self-respecting adult says roofles, or posts on a forum that has achievements?
(...)
Here's a thought - you used the word incorrectly and need to suck my balls.

Teeeheee! *spins around peeing* I can see you!

Sad.

Failed.

Fatman.

Not only is it undeniably true that I used the word correctly by its scientific consensus definition, it is true to such an extent that you have even given up on trying to undercut it! This is hilarious, flabbly! Given up, have we? Realized we might need to do a bit more reading before going up against our intellectual betters?

Roofles.

I win!

Frater Perdurabo · Post by **Frater Perdurabo** » Mon Dec 21, 2009 2:57 am

Brother None wrote:
Retlaw83 wrote:You used the word constative wrong.
Roofles. Why do you lie? Perhaps you need to read up on modern discourse analysis, starting with John Austin's authoritative work on performative and constative acts. OHLOLZ. PWNT!

Frater Perdurabo wrote:Try again.
You want me to try again, ergo you want me to post more, ergo you love me.

I knew it.

/mostpopularguyondacwtf

I don't have anything against you posting, if that's what you mean.

Megatron · Post by **Megatron** » Mon Dec 21, 2009 3:08 am

odin i will beat you up if you keep posting on here trust me ive already beat up at least four people on these forums lets see how smart you are when i headbutt you into the fog of death

Post by **Retlaw83** » Mon Dec 21, 2009 6:39 am

Brother None wrote: Teeeheee! *spins around peeing* I can see you!

Sad.

Failed.

Fatman.

You're retarded and don't know the proper usage of constative. Thanks for clarifying. What you seem to think is the definition of constative based on what you read is meaningless, as you obviously have trouble understanding the written word and cannot use words you have encountered correctly.

As for your comment about "intellectual betters," anyone who routinely uses "roofles" and posts on an internet message board that has videogame-like achievements has the intellect of a slug and has never had consensual sex they didn't pay for.

Now start sucking my balls.

cazsim83 · Post by **cazsim83** » Tue Dec 22, 2009 6:59 am

Brother None wrote:
Please allow me to delete NMA and merge all its content into DaC's system. !

well, technically that would be fair since you got a huge boost when ol' what's-hisâ€“name went fuckin nuts and gave you a bunch of content you never worked for, but hey, that's cool - carry on.

also - welcome back to where it's good and not internet nazi Germany

Unless it would make you feel more welcome by me moderating this into a section where you can't defend yourself, like The Vat or whatever the shit you're calling your over-censored e-peen-measuring locked forum these days. Y'know - because you have a dissenting opinion and all.

Brother None · Post by **Brother None** » Thu Dec 24, 2009 4:30 pm

Retlaw: lulz. You don't even know who John Austin is, huh?

cazsim83 wrote:well, technically that would be fair since you got a huge boost when ol' what's-his–name went fuckin nuts and gave you a bunch of content you never worked for, but hey, that's cool - carry on.

Eh? We never used any of the stuff dumped on us from the last attempt to save DaC's face by wisely just shutting it down, actually.

cazsim83 wrote:Unless it would make you feel more welcome by me moderating this into a section where you can't defend yourself, like The Vat or whatever the shit you're calling your over-censored e-peen-measuring locked forum these days. Y'know - because you have a dissenting opinion and all.

Huh? I'm afraid I don't really remember what you're talking about or - to be honest - know who you are. Sorry

cazsim83 · Post by **cazsim83** » Thu Dec 24, 2009 7:05 pm

Brother None wrote: Eh? We never used any of the stuff dumped on us from the last attempt to save DaC's face by wisely just shutting it down, actually.

Odin might have a different story, eh?

Anyhow, why are you around slumming, anyway? Haven't seen you for a long time.

Post by **Retlaw83** » Thu Dec 24, 2009 7:30 pm

Brother None wrote:Retlaw: lulz. You don't even know who John Austin is, huh?

He's a philosopher you hide behind because you don't have any brains of your own. You've never had a thought someone smarter hasn't spoon fed to you, and the most intelligent thing you've had in your head recently was my balls in your mouth.

I don't see what John Austin has to do with you being a grown man who says "lulz," "roofles" and posts on a forum that has achievements.

Yonmanc · Post by **Yonmanc** » Tue Dec 29, 2009 6:13 am

Brother None wrote:
Retlaw83 wrote:Interesting statement from a man who knows nothing.

And what self-respecting adult says roofles, or posts on a forum that has achievements?
(...)
Here's a thought - you used the word incorrectly and need to suck my balls.
Teeeheee! *spins around peeing* I can see you!

Sad.

Failed.

Fatman.

Not only is it undeniably true that I used the word correctly by its scientific consensus definition, it is true to such an extent that you have even given up on trying to undercut it! This is hilarious, flabbly! Given up, have we? Realized we might need to do a bit more reading before going up against our intellectual betters?

Roofles.

I win!

Havn't been on this site as long as most, still pretty new blah blah

But after reading this...

1) Calling somebody fat after having your argument pulled apart intelligently is like pissing your pants with a grin on your face. Sure you get the satisfaction of pissing, but you still look like a retard with urinary problems.

2) "Roofles" will NEVER be considered a funny/witty internet phrase. Ever.

Sorry to burst in like this BN, but, call it a pet peeve, I can't stand idiots who think that winning an intelligent argument simply consists of childish name-calling. And hey, this is from a guy who has no idea what you're arguing about, even sided observation, just saying when you behave like a twat, your argument instantly becomes worthless.

SenisterDenister · Post by **SenisterDenister** » Tue Dec 29, 2009 6:32 am

Don't apologize, he's from NMA.

Brother None · Post by **Brother None** » Tue Dec 29, 2009 6:09 pm

Ugh.

You guys are way too easy to troll. There's no challenge here. Sorry.

cazsim: again, am I supposed to know you?

Post by **King of Creation** » Wed Dec 30, 2009 1:03 am

cazsim83 wrote:Odin might have a different story, eh?

Whatever happened to Odin? Did you sacrifice him to Korn, Kharn?

SenisterDenister · Post by **SenisterDenister** » Wed Dec 30, 2009 1:27 am

That'd be Khorne, the Blood God, KoC. Korn is a band.

Post by **King of Creation** » Wed Dec 30, 2009 1:35 am

Haha, right. What about Tzeentch?

SenisterDenister · Post by **SenisterDenister** » Wed Dec 30, 2009 1:37 am

Just as planned?