Full size Fallout: New Vegas screenshots

ThisPocketOfSoil · Post by **ThisPocketOfSoil** » Wed Mar 10, 2010 6:18 pm

Super cool. Very pumped.

Jeff · Post by **Jeff** » Wed Mar 10, 2010 6:25 pm

what's with the tranny mutie

Yonmanc · Post by **Yonmanc** » Wed Mar 10, 2010 8:00 pm

ThisPocketOfSoil wrote:Super cool. Very pumped.

What does that even mean!?

Why is everybody a fucking moron?

Frater Perdurabo · Post by **Frater Perdurabo** » Thu Mar 11, 2010 2:41 am

I love it how it shows a Vault Dweller (tm) in a Vault Suit (tm) clubbing a Super Mutant (tm) in the face. How very representative, how very Fallout (tm).

Frater Perdurabo · Post by **Frater Perdurabo** » Thu Mar 11, 2010 2:44 am

Oh, it's some dick (tm) instead.

gobbleykins · Post by **gobbleykins** » Sun Mar 14, 2010 3:11 am

Gimp Mask wrote:what's with the tranny mutie

Magma-Man · Post by **Magma-Man** » Sun Mar 21, 2010 10:01 am

I can't wait for the game! They could of done the nightkin better but still, can't wait!

Yonmanc · Post by **Yonmanc** » Sun Mar 21, 2010 4:48 pm

Magma-Man wrote:I can't wait for the game! They could of done the nightkin better but still, can't wait!

lol ye ino wot u meen

Siede · Post by **Siede** » Tue Apr 27, 2010 3:20 pm

The graphics are still the same, a bit of a bore. But, if you think about it, if they don't make improvements in the graphics or game engine, they can cram alot of stuff in there. they basically have everything they need from the start, they just need to put it together now. With no new graphics it means alot less work in detail and more work in making the game bigger and with more features, weapons and stuff.

Yonmanc · Post by **Yonmanc** » Tue Apr 27, 2010 3:35 pm

Siede wrote:The graphics are still the same, a bit of a bore. But, if you think about it, if they don't make improvements in the graphics or game engine, they can cram alot of stuff in there. they basically have everything they need from the start, they just need to put it together now. With no new graphics it means alot less work in detail and more work in making the game bigger and with more features, weapons and stuff.

I agree, why have a few quality features when you can have a truckload of dog shit.

Siede · Post by **Siede** » Tue Apr 27, 2010 3:39 pm

Yonmanc wrote:
Siede wrote:The graphics are still the same, a bit of a bore. But, if you think about it, if they don't make improvements in the graphics or game engine, they can cram alot of stuff in there. they basically have everything they need from the start, they just need to put it together now. With no new graphics it means alot less work in detail and more work in making the game bigger and with more features, weapons and stuff.
I agree, why have a few quality features when you can have a truckload of dog shit.

Yeah you're probably right, but i'd rather have a bigger game lasting me 100+ hours than a beautiful game lasting me less than 4 hours. If the 4- game has online multiplayer or splits creen maybe but fallout is single player so i'd rather be more occupied with stuff and things to do than with visuals.

Yonmanc · Post by **Yonmanc** » Tue Apr 27, 2010 4:16 pm

Siede wrote:
Yonmanc wrote:
Siede wrote:The graphics are still the same, a bit of a bore. But, if you think about it, if they don't make improvements in the graphics or game engine, they can cram alot of stuff in there. they basically have everything they need from the start, they just need to put it together now. With no new graphics it means alot less work in detail and more work in making the game bigger and with more features, weapons and stuff.
I agree, why have a few quality features when you can have a truckload of dog shit.
Yeah you're probably right, but i'd rather have a bigger game lasting me 100+ hours than a beautiful game lasting me less than 4 hours. If the 4- game has online multiplayer or splits creen maybe but fallout is single player so i'd rather be more occupied with stuff and things to do than with visuals.

I doubt you finished Fallout 1 in 4 hours. And I'm not saying I want short games. GTA4 is a good example of 100+ hours of good material. Fallout 3 is a good example of a 100+ of fetsh quests and anal rape.

TwinkieGorilla · Post by **TwinkieGorilla** » Tue Apr 27, 2010 4:25 pm

bullshit. all Fallout 3 is, is a fucking wasteland exploration simulator for LARPing cunts too scared to even go outside their rooms and meet others as lame as they are.

Frater Perdurabo · Post by **Frater Perdurabo** » Tue Apr 27, 2010 5:22 pm

Siede wrote:The graphics are still the same, a bit of a bore. But, if you think about it, if they don't make improvements in the graphics or game engine, they can cram alot of stuff in there. they basically have everything they need from the start, they just need to put it together now. With no new graphics it means alot less work in detail and more work in making the game bigger and with more features, weapons and stuff.

You nailed it dog