The Firearms Thread.

Home of discussion, generally. If it doesn't go in any of the other forums, post it in here.
Post Reply
User avatar
fallout ranger
Hero of the Glowing Lands
Hero of the Glowing Lands
Posts: 2205
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 5:26 am
Location: Shady sands (no really!!)
Contact:

Post by fallout ranger »

Wolfman Walt wrote:Cannon has never been a slang term...

Similarly, pistols are not slang....

Way to take that MUCH too literally. :drunk: I really wasn't trying to get into an anthropological linguistics discussion.


AR15=rifle, so AR15-stock=Pistol? And a glock with a stock counts as an SBR. Hmmmm. Seems like a pretty loose term, pistol, basically means any firearm without a stock, not a definite form, action type, caliber, barrel length, rate of fire....
A cannon is any piece of artillery that uses gunpowder or other usually explosive-based propellants to launch a projectile.
Same thing applies to the cannon thing, broad, loose, general. Though today, it has come to mean something other than the dictionary definition.
does this work
User avatar
Retlaw83
Goatse Messiah
Goatse Messiah
Posts: 5326
Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2004 1:49 am

Post by Retlaw83 »

The word "slang" can only be interpreted one way. If you attempted to use it in a way that wasn't literal, you failed.

Though judging from how you are, I wouldn't be shocked to learn you don't know the full definition of literal.
"You're going to have a tough time doing that without your head, palooka."
- the Vault Dweller
Junktown Commando
Vault Scion
Vault Scion
Posts: 221
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2010 4:34 am

Post by Junktown Commando »

Retlaw83 wrote:The word "slang" can only be interpreted one way. If you attempted to use it in a way that wasn't literal, you failed. Though judging from how you are, I wouldn't be shocked to learn you don't know the full definition of literal.
Way to beat a dead horse. ¿Have you broken the 2×4 yet?

Anyways, I have a small confession to make referencing the 5.56 Revolver.
I saw a video of it years ago on a right-wing survivalist website (CLINTON Era militia, with allegedly some neo-NAZI affiliations). The site was taken down when the owner was arrested (on highly debatable charges) and that was the last I’ve seen of it.
I was told the maker was a Briton, but that’s really as much as I know about it (other than as already detailed). If anyone does know anything else about it, I’d be appreciative.
I Believe In “Peace Through Superior Firepower.�
Do you?
User avatar
Retlaw83
Goatse Messiah
Goatse Messiah
Posts: 5326
Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2004 1:49 am

Post by Retlaw83 »

Making one statement on a newly developed topic is a dead horse? Have you learned the meaning of colloquial expressions yet?
"You're going to have a tough time doing that without your head, palooka."
- the Vault Dweller
User avatar
fallout ranger
Hero of the Glowing Lands
Hero of the Glowing Lands
Posts: 2205
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 5:26 am
Location: Shady sands (no really!!)
Contact:

Post by fallout ranger »

Retlaw83 wrote:Though judging from how you are
And that is? :?


...


Can you believe Big 5 wants 300 for Yugo Mausers now? Jeez.
User avatar
Wolfman Walt
Mamma's Gang member
Mamma's Gang member
Posts: 5243
Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2003 1:31 pm
Location: La Grange, Kentucky
Contact:

Post by Wolfman Walt »

fallout ranger wrote:AR15=rifle, so AR15-stock=Pistol?
Negative, Ghost Rider. Pistol by definition is a weapon that is DESIGNED to be held and operated with one hand. An AR that just happens to lack a stock does not make it a pistol. It just makes it a rifle without a stock.
And a glock with a stock counts as an SBR.
Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken. Just because you add a stock to a pistol does not make it a battle rifle. It's just a pistol with a stock, similar to your example above. Glocks weren't designed to be fired from the shoulder, just as an AR-15 was not designed to be fired with one hand. Modifying one to fit into the other doesn't simply change what one is, otherwise every designation for a weapon is slang as per your apperent definition as with enough time and money, almost any handheld weapon can be modified to a point that someone would go "HEY, IT'S ACTUALLY X."
Seems like a pretty loose term, pistol, basically means any firearm without a stock, not a definite form, action type, caliber, barrel length, rate of fire....Same thing applies to the cannon thing, broad, loose, general.
That's why it's a weapon classification. It's like saying "Naval Ship" is slang because it covers a large variety of types of ships based both on purpose and tonnage. Same applies for "Airplane." Every thing you mentioned in there is covered by subtypes of pistols.

But that's not the point and this brings us back to our original topic, which wasn't about cannons, but autocannons. Autocannon is specifically enough identified as being an automatic weapon that fires shells as oppossed to bullets. 20mm is considered the point where projectiles stop being bullets and start being shells.
Blargh
Ãœberkommando
Ãœberkommando
Posts: 6303
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2003 7:11 pm

:glasscock:

Post by Blargh »

AUTOCANNONS ! :dance:

:drunk:
Kashluk

Post by Kashluk »

Wolfman Walt wrote:But that's not the point and this brings us back to our original topic, which wasn't about cannons, but autocannons. Autocannon is specifically enough identified as being an automatic weapon that fires shells as oppossed to bullets. 20mm is considered the point where projectiles stop being bullets and start being shells.
Ach, yes! Of course! I totally forgot about the difference between projectiles! Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice--- fool me twice :chick:
User avatar
fallout ranger
Hero of the Glowing Lands
Hero of the Glowing Lands
Posts: 2205
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 5:26 am
Location: Shady sands (no really!!)
Contact:

Post by fallout ranger »

Wolfman Walt wrote: almost any handheld weapon can be modified to a point that someone would go "HEY, IT'S ACTUALLY X."
That's the point, that names are essentially meaningless.
20mm is considered the point where projectiles stop being bullets and start being shells.
But the 50 BMG Raufoss Mk 211 classifies as a shell...ahh forget all that.


This
...fine example of circumventing absurd firearms bans. Just wish it was in my price range :anger:
User avatar
Retlaw83
Goatse Messiah
Goatse Messiah
Posts: 5326
Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2004 1:49 am

Post by Retlaw83 »

fallout ranger wrote:That's the point, that names are essentially meaningless.
It's the opposite of the point, you gibbering retard.
"You're going to have a tough time doing that without your head, palooka."
- the Vault Dweller
User avatar
fallout ranger
Hero of the Glowing Lands
Hero of the Glowing Lands
Posts: 2205
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 5:26 am
Location: Shady sands (no really!!)
Contact:

Post by fallout ranger »

Retlaw83 wrote:you gibbering retard.
Poor baby, you'll grow up one day.
does this work
User avatar
Retlaw83
Goatse Messiah
Goatse Messiah
Posts: 5326
Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2004 1:49 am

Post by Retlaw83 »

Comebacks are usually more impactful when they have some sort of relevancy to the original insult. Every post you create makes me wonder how someone so stupid can write full sentences.
"You're going to have a tough time doing that without your head, palooka."
- the Vault Dweller
Junktown Commando
Vault Scion
Vault Scion
Posts: 221
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2010 4:34 am

Post by Junktown Commando »

Wolfman Walt wrote:But that's not the point and this brings us back to our original topic, which wasn't about cannons, but autocannons.
Actually it was about firearms. By the generally accepted definition, autocannons aren’t considered firearms (nor usually are machineguns).
I am curios about that .50 Cal upper receiver for the AR-15 pattern. ¿Where did you find that?
fallout ranger wrote:Poor baby, you'll grow up one day.
No, he won’t. Punks like that never do.
I Believe In “Peace Through Superior Firepower.�
Do you?
User avatar
Wolfman Walt
Mamma's Gang member
Mamma's Gang member
Posts: 5243
Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2003 1:31 pm
Location: La Grange, Kentucky
Contact:

Post by Wolfman Walt »

machineguns & cannons
Machineguns are almost ALWAYS considered a firearm, unless they're so large they're not considered man portable. That means anything from a medium machine gun on down is considered a firearm. A firearm is a device which projects either single or multiple projectiles at high velocity through a controlled explosion. Infact, if you read U.S. law, a machine gun under Title 26 is: "... any firearm which shoots ... automatically more than one shot, without manual reloading, by a single function of the trigger"
User avatar
Retlaw83
Goatse Messiah
Goatse Messiah
Posts: 5326
Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2004 1:49 am

Post by Retlaw83 »

I wonder if Andy is a refugee from the 50s if he thinks punk is still an insult.
"You're going to have a tough time doing that without your head, palooka."
- the Vault Dweller
User avatar
Yonmanc
Hero of the Glowing Lands
Hero of the Glowing Lands
Posts: 2224
Joined: Tue Jun 23, 2009 11:46 pm
Location: Manchester, UK

Post by Yonmanc »

Retlaw83 wrote:I wonder if Andy is a refugee from the 50s if he thinks punk is still an insult.
Go suck a lemon.
Junktown Commando
Vault Scion
Vault Scion
Posts: 221
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2010 4:34 am

Post by Junktown Commando »

Wolfman Walt wrote:Machineguns are almost ALWAYS considered a firearm, unless they're so large they're not considered man portable. That means anything from a medium machine gun on down is considered a firearm. A firearm is a device which projects either single or multiple projectiles at high velocity through a controlled explosion. Infact, if you read U.S. law, a machine gun under Title 26 is: "... any firearm which shoots ... automatically more than one shot, without manual reloading, by a single function of the trigger"
The law is one thing, but in the real word, to be a machinegun it has to be belt fed and automatically loading (gas or otherwise)- Otherwise it’s an automatic rifle/pistol/whatever. By the definition given under Title 26, an M-2 might not be a machinegun. (I’d like to see someone argue THAT in court- The last group that tried that argument burned themselves up.)
And ¿what the Hell do you need an auto cannon for anyways? Try hunting with one of those, and you’ve cleaned, skinned, and cooked the meat before you’re even sure you hit the damned thing… Of course, it won’t matter, because there won’t be enough meat to actually eat… :drunk:
I Believe In “Peace Through Superior Firepower.�
Do you?
User avatar
ekkaman
Elite Wanderer
Elite Wanderer
Posts: 694
Joined: Tue May 19, 2009 6:10 am
Location: im everwhere im everwhere

Post by ekkaman »

:chainsaw:
User avatar
Stalagmite
Wandering Hero
Wandering Hero
Posts: 1192
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 1:29 am
Location: IN YOUR PANTS AUSTRALIA

Re: :glasscock:

Post by Stalagmite »

Blargh wrote:AUTOCANNONS ! :dance:

:drunk:
qfe
User avatar
Retlaw83
Goatse Messiah
Goatse Messiah
Posts: 5326
Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2004 1:49 am

Post by Retlaw83 »

Junktown Commando wrote:And ¿what the Hell do you need an auto cannon for anyways? Try hunting with one of those, and you’ve cleaned, skinned, and cooked the meat before you’re even sure you hit the damned thing… Of course, it won’t matter, because there won’t be enough meat to actually eat… :drunk:
Are you so fucking retarded that you think the primary application of an autocannon would be hunting, or any other type of civilian use? You'd think someone who claimed to be in the military would be able to tell civilian weapons apart from military-grade hardware.
"You're going to have a tough time doing that without your head, palooka."
- the Vault Dweller
Post Reply