Proclamation of Subsidiary Contrivances (Fallout Online)

[MadBill]

Awe cumon guys, he was just testing a nifty new script he wrote that takes normal talk and bigifies the words.

[Manoil]

your racist swell guy Manoil

Also should look up the usage for racist, even though it definitely applies here and you are right to have the utmost confidence in your literary prowess.

Also, your rank has been changed. Carry on!

[SenisterDenister]

This is a new low for dac. Having third parties keeping the peace?? Civilization has come to the wasteland at last...

How am I a third party? We're all members of the same forum.

[Cakester]

RUNNG HEAD PROCLMATION OF SUBSIDIARY CONTRIVANCES
PROSPERS PAEPR ON ANGIEN ALT3RCATIONS
FOR 2 LONG I HAEV DISPUT3D TEH CONVENTIONS BY WHICH I CONGR3GAET AND SUCUMBD 2 TEH PROXIMITY OF DA FALOUTS CONTEMPTIBL3 LORE!!1!!!1! I PROSPAR TEH MOST MAGNILOQUENT OF DA FALOUT COMUNITY HAEV FERVANTLEY P3RSPIERD BYOND TEH LIMITATIONS OF PURPOSEFUL CANON BY MAANS OF AVOLUTIONARY INSTRUM3NTALITY
THE!1!11 WTF INTERUPTIONS OF INTARM3DIAET D3RIVATIEVS SUCH AS FOT DO NOT 3XCED EXCLUSIONARY PASAEGS THROUGH WHICH I HAEV TRIUMPHED!111!1!11 OMG FALOUT SI A CONTINUOS WHOLA WHOS3 DYNMO PROCR3AETS TEH RESTLAS SWNGNG VIENS OF REVOLUTIONARY DISIEDNTS IN DA AL-2-COMON ASYM3TRIC ORDERNG
THIS!!!!1!1 OMG LOL AS WE KNOW AMBODEIS TEH SUM OF 3V3RY REPULSIEV SCOURG3 WHO BLEIVES H3 OR SH3 HAS INHERIETD DA TRUE FELNG ONE WUD NED 2 POSAS IF H3 OR SHE SI 2 3XPRES TEH ADJAECNT DIEMNSIONALITY TAHT SI BN3FIECNT 2 DA NOTION OF CONSTRUCTIEV FALOUT CRITICISM
2!1!!1!!1! OMG WTF B CONTINUED.!!1!1!!1!1!!!!1!11!1!! OMG WTF

[Wandering Linguist]

I'm sorry I missed this topic when it first came out. I have a theory on occurences such as this. The speaker seems to have the problem of inflating his liquid-base ego with "sophisticated" words. This is a classic case of purple prose. What could have been said using layman's terms was grown into silly proportions in what seems to be a need for overcompensation. For what, I don't know. Maybe recognition, respect, or, paradoxically, to be understood.

What you're really doing is using words beyond your contextual understanding and flashing them around like you own them. You don't. It's shamefully apparent that you don't. In comparative terms using purple prose is like weilding weapons of technical skill beyond your comprehension, firing them, and inevitably achieving critical failure and hurting yourself. Very rarely will it go right. When it does, you still won't know what the hell is going. It's a high-risk gamble you're better off not taking.

Whatever your deal is Cakester, you'd better work on it. You sound like a damn fool.

EDIT: wielding*

[AnneGwish]

Cakester. You sound like a damn fool.

There we go. Have to keep it simple so the kid can understand it.

[Wandering Linguist]

You've got a point there. Maybe I should've stuck to 8th grade vocabulary.

[Cakester]

I'm sorry I missed this topic when it first came out. I have a theory on occurences such as this. The speaker seems to have the problem of inflating his liquid-base ego with "sophisticated" words. This is a classic case of purple prose. What could have been said using layman's terms was grown into silly proportions in what seems to be a need for overcompensation. For what, I don't know. Maybe recognition, respect, or, paradoxically, to be understood.

What you're really doing is using words beyond your contextual understanding and flashing them around like you own them. You don't. It's shamefully apparent that you don't. In comparative terms using purple prose is like weilding weapons of technical skill beyond your comprehension, firing them, and inevitably achieving critical failure and hurting yourself. Very rarely will it go right. When it does, you still won't know what the hell is going. It's a high-risk gamble you're better off not taking.

Whatever your deal is Cakester, you'd better work on it. You sound like a damn fool.

EDIT: wielding*

actually i understood all of this. but it is just the kind of attack you just made that is the paradoxical outcome. well said for a douche bag who fears being outwitted by simple vocabulary terms I clicked together in such a short time.

but that time i put in, has had much reception here on DAC. enough to fuel me to go on.

edit: use spell checker next time unless you like your feigned expertise to be so transparent

[Retlaw83]

I'm sorry I missed this topic when it first came out. I have a theory on occurences such as this. The speaker seems to have the problem of inflating his liquid-base ego with "sophisticated" words. This is a classic case of purple prose. What could have been said using layman's terms was grown into silly proportions in what seems to be a need for overcompensation. For what, I don't know. Maybe recognition, respect, or, paradoxically, to be understood.

What you're really doing is using words beyond your contextual understanding and flashing them around like you own them. You don't. It's shamefully apparent that you don't. In comparative terms using purple prose is like weilding weapons of technical skill beyond your comprehension, firing them, and inevitably achieving critical failure and hurting yourself. Very rarely will it go right. When it does, you still won't know what the hell is going. It's a high-risk gamble you're better off not taking.

Whatever your deal is Cakester, you'd better work on it. You sound like a damn fool.

EDIT: wielding*

This is how you use big words correctly.

[Cakester]

I'm sorry I missed this topic when it first came out. I have a theory on occurences such as this. The speaker seems to have the problem of inflating his liquid-base ego with "sophisticated" words. This is a classic case of purple prose. What could have been said using layman's terms was grown into silly proportions in what seems to be a need for overcompensation. For what, I don't know. Maybe recognition, respect, or, paradoxically, to be understood.

What you're really doing is using words beyond your contextual understanding and flashing them around like you own them. You don't. It's shamefully apparent that you don't. In comparative terms using purple prose is like weilding weapons of technical skill beyond your comprehension, firing them, and inevitably achieving critical failure and hurting yourself. Very rarely will it go right. When it does, you still won't know what the hell is going. It's a high-risk gamble you're better off not taking.

Whatever your deal is Cakester, you'd better work on it. You sound like a damn fool.

EDIT: wielding*

This is how you use big words correctly.

too bad his is an attack on my intentions where as my OP had its own universe to deal with.

[Cakester]

and one more thing

[TwinkieGorilla]

you wear some special pants there, Prosper.

[Aonaran]

This thread. Epic. I vote we add "Our vocabulary skills is above you" to the caption database...

[gobbleykins]

seconded

[Manoil]

This thread. Epic. I vote we add "Our vocabulary skills is above you" to the caption database...

Done

[Taco-Hero]

Sparknotes, anyone?

[Redeye]

Who is Taco-decorator?