Joystiq reviews Fallout: New Vegas

[King of Creation]

<strong>[ Game -> Review ]</strong> - More info on <a href="http://fallout.wikia.com/wiki/Fallout: New Vegas">Game: Fallout: New Vegas</a>

<p><a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2010/10/19/fallo ... iew/">Full review here</a>. Joystiq call Bethesda on the fact that the engine is STILL crap and will never be anything but crap.</p>
<blockquote>
<p><em>Paradoxically, <em>New Vegas</em> doesn't make good on much new on any front, and it takes a hit both as experience and product for it. As fond as I am of the idea of an alternate reality <em>Fallout 3</em>, we shouldn't forget that game was released in late 2008, and Obsidian's contribution to the franchise looks and feels every day of two years old, maybe more. But it's still a giant, cool, twisted, funny world to explore, chock full of a staggering number of adventures. Is that really the sort of experience you can afford to pass up, no matter what year it is?</em></p>
</blockquote>

[Kashluk]

the idea of an alternate reality Fallout 3

So 'canon' is 'alternate reality' these days?

[SenisterDenister]

[King of Creation]

the idea of an alternate reality Fallout 3

So 'canon' is 'alternate reality' these days?

Yeah, while I can vouch for the fact that the articles I post are reviews, I cannot vouch for the fact that the authors of said reviews are not idiots.