I took some Adderall. Now here is a guide to evil

[Cakester]

Look at your crotch, now back at the computer screen.

The computer screen is gone, as is your desk. You see only a hollow blackness.

For some reason I am able to shift into a state of calm assertive reasoning tonight.

As for the unenthusiastic pompous ass I quoted, I have something to offer that I would like you to pass on for the rest of your life .

GUIDE To Eliminating Opponents.

Part 1

Start by achieving a viable description of a person which may seem like they could exist. Be sure to keep your own doubts hidden as you pass on your stream of oral articulations into the room . This is important because that room you are in, that you know is temporarily dedicated to an open debate, is a room you wouldn't have the privilege to be if you had not been deceptive at some point. However, don't let that hold you back as you arrogantly try to assert you are flawless just because of how you embrace human rights.

There is a strong possibility you will try to stop reading my guide at some point so that you may post an inevitable mundane onslaught of inflammatory remarks. I warn you now, that if you want a fighting chance of obscuring your motives with mystery, you should first realize you have an inability to make the distinctions that well-founded skeptics must, in order to be taken seriously. For clarity, before you engage me or those that may endorse this guide, know that you will lose and in a futile effort will try to fake a temper, pin us as if we are at fault, and stretch your credibility too thin for even the dimmest to not see that what you stand for is a lie.


Part 2

Compared to the ideologies that you will say are corrupt, do not let a peep out that might interrupt your constant watering down of your fears.Those fears which when cross-examined, are evidently present because you know that by comparison to even a traditionalist, your convictions are unoriginal.

Put your own illegitimate discovery aside in a safe place, and be sure to object to any possibility that your supposed descriptions possess even a potential of logically being inadmissible because a body of scientific evidence counters the notion that you can predict what you say.

Enjoy your disingenuous smearing every notable improbability and watch your opponents squirm and cringe.

You might even want to land a single accurate adjective that can fairly be associated with my personality, as long as people are willing to continue to listen to your repetitive claims about your other claims being sharp enough that you have a point . Yum yum! Just imagine poking some theoretical voodoo doll, and try to maintain you are candid despite your every character assassination made to date.

[Retlaw83]

those that may endorse this guide

No one endorses this guide.

[Stalagmite]

those that may endorse this guide

No one endorses this guide.

[Frater Perdurabo]

those that may endorse this guide

No one endorses this guide.

[Yonmanc]

No one endorses this guide.

[Alister McFap II Esq.]

[Cakester]

[Retlaw83]

Yonmanc wins!

[Yonmanc]

Hoorah!

[Blargh]

[Retlaw83]

After that I'd have to say Blargh wins.

[Yonmanc]

Oh

[rad resistance]

Everyone wins a pony!

[Psychoul]

Who uses that horrible skin...I mean, its horrible!!...

Everyone wins a pony!

PONY!!?yaaaay............ awh... its not a pony.. its a Daubentonia madagascariensis
<a href="http://www.google.com/images?q=Daubento ... 0">Link</a>

[Retlaw83]

I once rode a Daubentonia madagascariensis into battle.

[rad resistance]

The Daubentonia Madagascariensis i rode into battle was Retlaw's mother.