Fallout: NV on sale on Steam

[POOPERSCOOPER]

<strong>[ Game -> Update ]</strong>

<p>If you don't have the game yet you can get it on steam for 40% off and I think an additional 10% if you already own FO3. You can find the full link of games on sale today here;</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"> http://www.shacknews.com/onearticle.x/66938</p>
<p>Also I think Dead Money DLC is released now maybe.</p><p>Spotted @ <a href="http://www.shacknews.com">Shacknews</a></p>

[Retlaw83]

The Civ IV complete pack is about $6.50. Is it worth it or should I just stick with Civ III?

[Atomkilla]

If it has all the expansions, then yeah. I'd buy it.

[Retlaw83]

You seem pretty okay, new guy, but I need the opinion of a DAC patriot before I spend the lordly sum of $6.24 plus tax.

[Mehar]

I concur, if it includes the entire lineup of IV titles it's a great deal.

[SenisterDenister]

Civ IV is worth six bucks, to me. You may not like it as much as Civ III but its certainly not a bad game.

[Retlaw83]

Then it is decided, unless Blargh comes in to veto this at the eleventh hour.

[Stalagmite]

As a representative of Blargh I can say that Civ 2 is the best hands down but that cheap of a price is worth grating yourself into, provided you haven't any other.

[Retlaw83]

I have Civ III, but it and Windows 7 don't play nice when it comes to things like the ending sequence.

[SenisterDenister]

Beyond the Sword is the only version of Civ IV worth playing, its an expansion pack but it seems like to me it has the most content overall.

[Blargh]

ALPHA CENTAURI YOU WHORES

representative

You are as much my representative as a fart is herald to a cyclone.

[Retlaw83]

Blargh is, I fear, two days too late to save me $6. Either the systems have changed enough to make me clueless, or this game isn't as good as its predecessor.

Is there some reason I have to feed five units of knights into a battle to kill one fucking unit of axemen out in the open?

[Stalagmite]

You are as much my representative as a fart is herald to a cyclone.

[Frater Perdurabo]

Blargh is, I fear, two days too late to save me $6. Either the systems have changed enough to make me clueless, or this game isn't as good as its predecessor.

Is there some reason I have to feed five units of knights into a battle to kill one fucking unit of axemen out in the open?

Conquests is far superior to this shitter.
I tried Call to Power 2 a few days ago since my brother bought it on GOG. To be fair, I didn't give it much of a chance but I didn't like it. It had some awesome new features but I couldn't stomach the graphics so uninstalled it. Apparently it is supposed to be great due to its modability, there are a gazillion mods out there, ranging from those that drastically enhance the AI to custom scenarios.

[Stalagmite]

Medieval 2: Total War is quite addictive. 6 hours flew right by one night doing the campaign.

[SenisterDenister]

Sorry about Civ IV not being your thing, Ret.

[Retlaw83]

I'm actually getting into it now. Just spent 3 hours playing it without realizing I had been playing for three hours. I had to go to war because the damn French-Chinese thought they had a right to Hawaii.

I'm liking how diplomacy is more complicated and yet more transparent than in Civ III, but on the other hand Civ III was a game I played for 36 hours straight after first getting it.

[SenisterDenister]

Science-damn those French-Chinese fools!

[Stalagmite]

and I already have New Vegas.
It's a pretty cool game if you're interested.

[Dogmeatlives]

Hey guys, how does Civ V compare to the others? I want them new graffix, but is it shit?