Bethesda appeals their loss again

Stalagmite · Post by **Stalagmite** » Sat Aug 20, 2011 7:36 am

You've never been a credible source of enlightenment Blargh just a temporary lick from a shitstain to any who finds such affairs delightful.

You've built your own ego on it.

Blargh · Post by **Blargh** » Sat Aug 20, 2011 8:36 am

SCATHING.

Really, Neville ? Credible source of Enlightenment ? Is IT something you would expect to find in an encyclopaedia, a shop, a hat ? To dispense momentarily with the ephemeral and intangible both : IT is not the destination, IT is the shoe. A shoe shop ? Ha.

As you have so enthusiastically demonstrated that there is no way anyone could reasonably expect you to understand just how daft this is ; and as I am, above all else, compassionate, I shall elucidate :

It is marginally less laughably ridiculous than you.

Also, please don't presume to know anything about my ego. While it is as amusing as it is is inaccurate, I am thinking your persona could do with permitting some of the mediocrity to dry and flake off. Best to not let it accrue too . . . densely.

Or don't.

Post by **Retlaw83** » Sat Aug 20, 2011 9:33 am

Stalagmite wrote: Too bad many oldies already consider the site dead and I can see why with the shit exhaust it fumes.

You like garbage like Call of Duty, and think "RPGs" becoming less thoughtful and more like that is an improvement. It's not - it increases sales numbers while declining quality. Your assertion is lowest common denominator is an improvement; it's not.

Bashing things because they're mainstream is idiotic. Praising things because they rake in huge sales numbers but are shit products after being brainwashed by your corporate masters is more so.

SenisterDenister · Post by **SenisterDenister** » Sat Aug 20, 2011 6:26 pm

I think the "DACK IS DEAD" bit is more of a running joke, Stag. 'Cause if its really dead I think we've been doing fairly well for over the past four years.

rad resistance · Post by **rad resistance** » Sat Aug 20, 2011 10:04 pm

DaC is like a well trimed escort you just keep coming back for the shallow love and nasty sex.

St. Toxic · Post by **St. Toxic** » Sun Aug 21, 2011 9:04 pm

Hats off to Blargh for consistency.

Blargh · Post by **Blargh** » Mon Aug 22, 2011 1:43 am

What's this ? An immutable paragon of the sensical dodging the winnowing glare of incongruity, thus represented by innumerable others within this context - writing of

Consistency ?

Ahahahaha. How precious.

Tofu Man · Post by **Tofu Man** » Fri Aug 26, 2011 5:43 am

everyone wrote:

It's funny how these guys and their universal appeal (HA!) have (almost?) made conformism the new nonconformism.
Huzzah for the underdog! Now shoot <strike>him</strike> it.

SenisterDenister · Post by **SenisterDenister** » Fri Aug 26, 2011 7:38 am

How vain are you that you wear a shirt with your own face on it? Being "ironic" or not that's just fucking narcissistic.

VasikkA · Post by **VasikkA** » Fri Aug 26, 2011 7:59 pm

Maybe he wears a face that matches with his shirt?

rad resistance · Post by **rad resistance** » Fri Aug 26, 2011 8:05 pm

That guy really has the serial rapist look going for him.

Post by **Retlaw83** » Sat Aug 27, 2011 12:45 am

I raped some cereal once. The stockboy in the grocery store was not impressed when he caught me with my dick in a box of Cap'n Crunch.

St. Toxic · Post by **St. Toxic** » Sun Aug 28, 2011 12:23 am

Blargh wrote:What's this ? An immutable paragon of the sensical dodging the winnowing glare of incongruity, thus represented by innumerable others within this context - writing of

Consistency ?

Ahahahaha. How precious.

I just think that 8 years of basically one-way communication merits some honest appreciation. You're obviously committed to this cause, even though any observer, informed or otherwise, would brand it a dead one, leaving relative few conclusions to be drawn within this context; an unknown personal motive or rampant lunacy? I'm not one to speculate, but only to voice my respect for such a lasting project.

Have you thought about what you're going to do for your 10-year anniversary?

Blargh · Post by **Blargh** » Sun Aug 28, 2011 1:13 am

Something known amongst certain Shapes as a . . . backhanded compliment, no ? And in reverse ? Ahaha, masterful.

Abscensse wrote:10

Research indicates that forum accounts do not attribute any significance to the assumption that the concept of time exists as anything more than a rudimentary coping mechanism.

St. Toxic · Post by **St. Toxic** » Sun Aug 28, 2011 2:22 pm

Oh, but most would agree that yours is "special".

Blargh · Post by **Blargh** » Sun Aug 28, 2011 11:58 pm

Is this some sort of inane mirror universe were a consensus carries some inalienable factual weight by the forlorn virtue of being a consensus ?

Further - Special . . ? :golfclap:

St. Toxic · Post by **St. Toxic** » Mon Aug 29, 2011 6:17 am

Blargh wrote:were ?

Well, I am competing against "research". Had you said God(s) the matter would be different.

VasikkA · Post by **VasikkA** » Mon Aug 29, 2011 4:49 pm

Jeez, get a room you two.

Blargh · Post by **Blargh** » Tue Aug 30, 2011 10:11 am

O no it is a typo - dreaded ruination of cogent argument. Forfeiture of glory and dignity and . Woe. To be entirely true, a specific, current, perplexing tangent of yours found tedious as fuck, so any gaunt reason to not is giddily Welcomed.

It seems my letter before I key became malignant. Novel.

St. Toxic · Post by **St. Toxic** » Tue Aug 30, 2011 6:38 pm

Oh, that? I barely even noticed.

Duck and Cover

Bethesda appeals their loss again

INcredible, amirite - iamrite.

WITH ALL THE CHARACTERISTIC FINESSE OF A PALSIED <deleted

Actually, it's not funny. At all.

Re: WITH ALL THE CHARACTERISTIC FINESSE OF A PALSIED <del

One sided ? WHERE HAVE YOU BEEN

Whisper to Icecream 95817.

Re: Whisper to Icecream 95817.

wat a same