Lithorai wrote:Seems as though it is rather unhealthy to have an unpopular opinion on this board. This will not deter me from expressing mine, regardless of the imperitive negative reaction.
Or maybe you are posting your opinion
because it will get a harsh reaction.
Troll.
I think Fallout 2 is superior to Fallout 1. I feel that its gameplay, while much the same, is expanded in comparison;
Yeah, one or two gameplay features make all the difference!
You played Fallout2 before you played Fallout, didn't you?
I feel that the storyline is more coherant,
However, it is near exactly the same as the plot in Fallout, and doesn't go near justifying the communities you encounter.
Casinos in New Reno. Why? No tourists, not enough money.
Gold mines in Redding. Why would anyone care about gold?
and I like the expanded number of items.
Of which, none really fit in with the setting, or are totally useless easter egg items.
However, the thing that clinches Fallout 2 being a superior game for me is nothing more than the Crashed Whale random encounter.
These sorts of easter eggs are in their thousands across the game. It seems to me that they have just thrown together a bunch of pop-culture references and called it a game.
You must be blind if you can't see the lack of quality there.
-Battons down hatches, waiting for flames-
Did I call you a troll yet?
Troll!
