IPLY has a plan!
- Saint_Proverbius
- Righteous Subjugator
- Posts: 1549
- Joined: Tue May 21, 2002 1:57 am
- Contact:
IPLY has a plan!
<strong>[Company -> Update]</strong>
<a href="http://msnbc.com/">MS-NBC</a> has a neat little <A href="http://famulus.msnbc.com/FamulusCom/pr- ... ">story</a> that explains why <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?d=t&s=^IXIC">NASDAQ</a> hasn't delisted <A href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?d=t&s=IPLY">IPLY</a> even after the <a href="http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/020815/deth ... >ultimatim letter</a> they got last <b>August 14th</b>. Here's a piece of the <a href="http://famulus.msnbc.com/FamulusCom/pr- ... blockquote> As previously announced, the Company received a Nasdaq Staff Determination letter on August 14, 2002 indicating that the Company failed to regain compliance with the minimum $1.00 bid price per share requirement for continued listing on The Nasdaq SmallCap Market, and that the Company's securities would be delisted from this market unless the Company requested a hearing before the Nasdaq Listing Qualifications Panel to review the Staff's determination. The Company requested a hearing by written submission, and the Staff's determination to delist the Company's securities has been stayed pending the Panel's determination.
<br> Interplay has provided to the Nasdaq Listing Qualifications Panel a written submission demonstrating <u>how the Company intends to regain compliance with the minimum $1.00 bid price per share requirement</u>, as well as the continued listing requirement set forth in Marketplace Rule 4310(c)(2)(B) for which the Company currently is not in compliance. Under this Rule, the Company must maintain (i) stockholders' equity of at least $2.5 million, (ii) a market capitalization of at least $35 million, or (iii) net income of $500,000 (excluding extraordinary or non-recurring items) in the most recently completed fiscal year or in two of the last three most recently completed fiscal years.
<br> There can be no assurance that the Panel will respond favorably to the Company's submission and grant its request to remain listed on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market. </blockquote><Br><a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?d=t&s=IPLY">IPLY</a> is currently resting at <b>$0.21/share</b>.
<a href="http://msnbc.com/">MS-NBC</a> has a neat little <A href="http://famulus.msnbc.com/FamulusCom/pr- ... ">story</a> that explains why <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?d=t&s=^IXIC">NASDAQ</a> hasn't delisted <A href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?d=t&s=IPLY">IPLY</a> even after the <a href="http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/020815/deth ... >ultimatim letter</a> they got last <b>August 14th</b>. Here's a piece of the <a href="http://famulus.msnbc.com/FamulusCom/pr- ... blockquote> As previously announced, the Company received a Nasdaq Staff Determination letter on August 14, 2002 indicating that the Company failed to regain compliance with the minimum $1.00 bid price per share requirement for continued listing on The Nasdaq SmallCap Market, and that the Company's securities would be delisted from this market unless the Company requested a hearing before the Nasdaq Listing Qualifications Panel to review the Staff's determination. The Company requested a hearing by written submission, and the Staff's determination to delist the Company's securities has been stayed pending the Panel's determination.
<br> Interplay has provided to the Nasdaq Listing Qualifications Panel a written submission demonstrating <u>how the Company intends to regain compliance with the minimum $1.00 bid price per share requirement</u>, as well as the continued listing requirement set forth in Marketplace Rule 4310(c)(2)(B) for which the Company currently is not in compliance. Under this Rule, the Company must maintain (i) stockholders' equity of at least $2.5 million, (ii) a market capitalization of at least $35 million, or (iii) net income of $500,000 (excluding extraordinary or non-recurring items) in the most recently completed fiscal year or in two of the last three most recently completed fiscal years.
<br> There can be no assurance that the Panel will respond favorably to the Company's submission and grant its request to remain listed on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market. </blockquote><Br><a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?d=t&s=IPLY">IPLY</a> is currently resting at <b>$0.21/share</b>.
- Tank
- Wanderer of the Wastes
- Posts: 566
- Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2002 7:10 am
- Location: Hiding under your bed.
- Contact:
So in other words, they have some sort of deep dark secret plan hidden somewhere deep up the sleeve of their idiotic executives who like playing on the line of bankruptcy?
>shakes his head<
I'll never learn to understand these guys...
>shakes his head<
I'll never learn to understand these guys...
The Unwashed Village- Abandon ye sanity!
Live with Honor
Fight for Honor
Die with Honor
Let not Glory blind Thee
Live with Honor
Fight for Honor
Die with Honor
Let not Glory blind Thee
-
- Vault Dweller
- Posts: 143
- Joined: Tue May 28, 2002 11:59 pm
- Saint_Proverbius
- Righteous Subjugator
- Posts: 1549
- Joined: Tue May 21, 2002 1:57 am
- Contact:
-
- Respected
- Posts: 86
- Joined: Thu Apr 18, 2002 11:48 am
- Location: Hiding. From you.
- Contact:
I figure it's probably a good idea to put $10 on IPLY.Crow of Ill Omen wrote:Anyone with any faith in Interplay should go buy their shares now. If their plan works, you'll be looking at multiplying your capital by 500%.
*waits for the stampede*
*waits some more*
*looks disappointed*
It's the having any faith bit, isn't?
If they fail, (which they probably will) you lost $10, who the fuck cares about $10?
If they do not fail, you win.
- Red
- Hero of the Glowing Lands
- Posts: 2085
- Joined: Wed May 15, 2002 11:58 am
- Location: Nowhere (important anyway)
- Contact:
You'd only get ~50$ out of it... and with the trading expense and only 40$ profit, that'll probably COST you money... Unless you have some free tradings for some reason (which I know plenty of firms offer when you do certain stuff, but if you know about all this stuff then why would you invest in such a low profile company as IPLY )
...
Its Black Isle, not Sierra...Vikjunk wrote:I personally would rather not see another Fallout then see BIS fuck up the Fallout Universe more then it already is...Darwin_187 wrote:Obviously fallout fans. They probably want a sequel too.
Somehow, I just know it, OTB is involved in this.
:roll:
BTW, I hope they got some plans to bring back some cool franchises - and not to just consoles - but PC's as well.