Ad blocker detected: Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker on our website.
Warlord wrote:Pelit gave something like 93/100 to the first VERY buggy version!
Fallout 2, right? Read again, it says the score is based on the patched version. I have every Pelit-magazine up to date. :roll:
The original Fallout got 'only' 91 points, for some reason. Ah well...
By the way, I suggest you read the 9/2002 issue, it has a long article about Fallout and it's history with emphasis on Tim Cain & co. A very accurate one, too.
Oh, well thanks for clearing it out.
I only have a few numbers, bought every now and then...but maybe I'll go and buy that 9/2002.. was it long story there? Not much point of bying a magazine for just one page eh? Or then I'll go to library..
- May the blood of thine enemies stain the ground -
Kashluk wrote:Fallout 1 and 2 have both always collected over 90/100 points from every finnish gaming magazine I've read. But Fo:T instead got something like 70/100 from every mag :P
You're forgetting PC Gamer. They gave it a final score of 85%.
Kashluk wrote:Fallout 1 and 2 have both always collected over 90/100 points from every finnish gaming magazine I've read. But Fo:T instead got something like 70/100 from every mag :P
You're forgetting PC Gamer. They gave it a final score of 85%.
Well, yeah, but no one pays attention to PC Gamer because they're hype/BioWhore slaves. "OMG [BioWare game here] IS SO GOOD BECAUSE OF A COMBAT STYLE THAT CATERS TO OUR LACK OF ATTENTION SPAN AND A TOTALLY CLICHED STORY WITH NO OTHER WAYS OF PLAYING TO DISTRACT US FROM THE GRAPHICS!! OMGOMG! SO COOL! ALSO, WE ENJOY BIOWARE PRODUCTS A LITTLE TOO MUCH SINCE THE INFINITY ENGINE GAMES ARE ALL THE SAME AND WE LIKE THE STAGNATION OF THE GENRE!"