Rather than digging dead threads. AKA The Picture Thread

ExtremeDrinker · Post by **ExtremeDrinker** » Tue Aug 23, 2005 11:34 pm

But seriously...Is that a chick? I've shown it around, and all my friends agree that's a 15 year old girl.

Shagnak · Post by **Shagnak** » Wed Aug 24, 2005 1:12 am

ExtremeRyno wrote:But seriously...Is that a chick? I've shown it around, and all my friends agree that's a 15 year old girl.

I'm not convinced.

Ask it to show us its tits.

Ernesto · Post by **Ernesto** » Wed Aug 24, 2005 1:15 am

That's child porn.

EDIT -- The big One-Oh.

Franz Schubert · Post by **Franz Schubert** » Wed Aug 24, 2005 4:21 am

Since when does tits = porn? We just want some proof, that's all.

ApTyp · Post by **ApTyp** » Wed Aug 24, 2005 4:24 am

Man, fuck tits.

ExtremeDrinker · Post by **ExtremeDrinker** » Wed Aug 24, 2005 5:10 am

YEAH! Fuck tits in the ass.

hat_man99 · Post by **hat_man99** » Wed Aug 24, 2005 8:17 am

Is that even possible, i mean without stretching the ass cavity or removing the 'tits', if so make pictures.

PiP · Post by **PiP** » Wed Aug 24, 2005 11:27 am

gundam2000 wrote:heres me a year or so ago, the picture is a bit blurry but what can you do.

I just re-post it to make the picture actually show.

this could be a boy as well

you know we're probably jumping all over his/her ego by this sex debate, precipitating an emerging-right-now nail-biting habit.

Blargh · Post by **Blargh** » Wed Aug 24, 2005 12:17 pm

'toga has the right of it. With few exceptions, one's interactions through the Internet will remain electronic. Suffice to say ; what is the point ? Malice ? Amusement ? Insensitivity for the sake thereof ?

One could be forgiven for thinking a predilection for this 'Gundam' would be enough. That spurious debate regarding apparent/alleged androgyny would be seen for what it is : needless. But no, 'twas not to be. A pity.

Woe.

ApTyp · Post by **ApTyp** » Wed Aug 24, 2005 2:18 pm

I THINK I can see the tits. Sort of.

Naked_Lunch · Post by **Naked_Lunch** » Wed Aug 24, 2005 2:41 pm

That's no woman, it's a man, baby.

VasikkA · Post by **VasikkA** » Wed Aug 24, 2005 2:44 pm

Hey, it's Harry Potter! Shoot it!!

ApTyp · Post by **ApTyp** » Wed Aug 24, 2005 2:55 pm

Naked_Lunch wrote:That's no woman, it's a man, baby.

Everyone is a girl when they're face down

Franz Schubert · Post by **Franz Schubert** » Wed Aug 24, 2005 5:35 pm

Unless they have a hairy ass.

vx trauma · Post by **vx trauma** » Wed Aug 24, 2005 6:35 pm

Naked_Lunch · Post by **Naked_Lunch** » Wed Aug 24, 2005 7:22 pm

Susan?

VasikkA · Post by **VasikkA** » Wed Aug 24, 2005 7:25 pm

God shave the queen!

vx trauma · Post by **vx trauma** » Wed Aug 24, 2005 7:26 pm

She has a hairy ass.

gundam2000 · Post by **gundam2000** » Thu Aug 25, 2005 8:19 am

Anyone who likes gundam enough to name himself on a forum, get a sig and an avatar after the serie is a shitbag.

hey fuck you your named after lord of the rings now is that geeky or what. shitbag.

One could be forgiven for thinking a predilection for this 'Gundam' would be enough. That spurious debate regarding apparent/alleged androgyny would be seen for what it is : needless. But no, 'twas not to be. A pity.

what the fuck are you going on about anyway

I THINK I can see the tits. Sort of.

well i think your an asshole sort of. bitch. naked_lunch is the only half decent guy around here it seems. the rest of you are

Shagnak · Post by **Shagnak** » Thu Aug 25, 2005 8:25 am

Well?
WTF are you?