28 Weeks Later Trailer

S4ur0n27 · Post by **S4ur0n27** » Thu Mar 29, 2007 2:26 pm

Trailer looks okay, but it looks like a totally different movie than the first one.

It's funny how now that the first movie has been succesful, they hired a bunch of names, stuffed the movie full of CGI, and obviously the story will be shit.

What might save it is it's british, and it has Robert Carlyle.

Cthulhugoat · Post by **Cthulhugoat** » Fri Mar 30, 2007 12:49 am

Ach, no Danny Bowels (he's a producer, though). Instead, they put some mexican one-hit wonder.

I'm with the emoticon dude. Kids are a bad sign. Hope there aren't any monkeys as well. Kids + monkeys = doom.

Blargh · Post by **Blargh** » Fri Mar 30, 2007 2:43 am

Apes first, now childs. They simply must have something especially heinous planned for the third. O, the obnoxiousity. I shudder.

I shudder.

Dreadnought · Post by **Dreadnought** » Fri Mar 30, 2007 3:52 am

Blargh wrote:childs

mick1965 · Post by **mick1965** » Sat Mar 31, 2007 11:14 am

Mad Max RW wrote:Looks pretty good. 28 Days later wasn't terrible, but I will never get used to running zombies.

I can't wait until the World War Z movie adaptation comes out. I'm reading the book right now and it's fucking awesome.

28 Days/Weeks aren't zombie movies, the infected are still alive but under the effects of a virus. That's why the original was called 28 days, because supposedly it takes that long to die without food.

I'm also looking forward to World War Z. I haven't read the book yet but have been meaning to pick it up. I've heard it's a great read.

Mick

PsychoSniper · Post by **PsychoSniper** » Sat Mar 31, 2007 1:13 pm

mick1965 wrote:
Mad Max RW wrote:Looks pretty good. 28 Days later wasn't terrible, but I will never get used to running zombies.

I can't wait until the World War Z movie adaptation comes out. I'm reading the book right now and it's fucking awesome.
28 Days/Weeks aren't zombie movies, the infected are still alive but under the effects of a virus. That's why the original was called 28 days, because supposedly it takes that long to die without food.

I'm also looking forward to World War Z. I haven't read the book yet but have been meaning to pick it up. I've heard it's a great read.

Mick

Wow, as usualy hollywood is smokin something, since you die from lack of water before lack of food.

mick1965 · Post by **mick1965** » Sat Mar 31, 2007 2:14 pm

PsychoSniper wrote:Wow, as usualy hollywood is smokin something, since you die from lack of water before lack of food.

I suppose the assumption is that the infected are able to drink fluids if they find them, but aren't of right mind to look for food. On the other hand maybe it was just that "3 Days Later" wouldn't have been as appealing as a film title.

Mick

PsychoSniper · Post by **PsychoSniper** » Sat Mar 31, 2007 2:40 pm

Ah yes, those damn irratating facts.

:p

Mismatch · Post by **Mismatch** » Sun Apr 01, 2007 8:38 am

I always thought it was called 28days because he woke up in the hospital 28days after the initial release of the virus or summit.

silly me

jetbaby · Post by **jetbaby** » Sun Apr 01, 2007 12:16 pm

Mismatch wrote:I always thought it was called 28days bcase he dokw up in the hospital 28days after the initial release of the virus or summit.

silly me

NOT HISTORICAL ENOUGH

(But yeah, silly you. For actually paying attention.)

Dreadnought · Post by **Dreadnought** » Sun Apr 01, 2007 2:40 pm

Mismatch wrote:I always thought it was called 28days because he woke up in the hospital 28days after the initial release of the virus or summit.

silly me

I thought the same. I knew they starve after a while, but I must have missed the part where they explain how long it takes.
That might be due to my habit of innitiating heavy drug abuse while watching movies.

Frater Perdurabo · Post by **Frater Perdurabo** » Sun Apr 01, 2007 3:47 pm

Anyway, I thought that it took 3 weeks for one to die without food...
3 weeks without food.
3 days without water.
3 minutes withour air.

Very general, but a good idea.

Splatterpope · Post by **Splatterpope** » Sun Apr 01, 2007 10:01 pm

When I first heard the title, I thought it was something to do with the female menstrual cycle.

Dreadnought · Post by **Dreadnought** » Mon Apr 02, 2007 4:38 am

Frater Perdurabo wrote: 3 minutes withour air.

No. Check those idiots who dive for 8 minutes or so and if there is some online guniess book resource, there MUST be a world record in 'not breathing'.

Thor Kaufman · Post by **Thor Kaufman** » Mon Apr 02, 2007 7:04 am

he was talking a rough estimate of the average populace, I presume

VasikkA · Post by **VasikkA** » Mon Apr 02, 2007 4:11 pm

Thor Kaufman wrote:he was talking a rough estimate of the average populace, I presume

Dreadnought is autistic, I presume

Mismatch · Post by **Mismatch** » Mon Apr 02, 2007 5:58 pm

VasikkA wrote:
Thor Kaufman wrote:he was talking a rough estimate of the average populace, I presume
Dreadnought is autistic, I presume

I read acoustic, and was rather happy thinking about playing him until I realized my error. He sounded somewhat <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ZAA5k-Jdno">like this.</a>

vx trauma · Post by **vx trauma** » Sat Apr 14, 2007 2:38 pm

333 - the number of acustic peepoels.

Dreadnought · Post by **Dreadnought** » Sat Apr 14, 2007 3:13 pm

I'm acutaly digitaly synthetic, for I'm unable to play real instruments.

And I can say for sure that I am not a fucking autist, because I can't even count my change, that how bad I am in maths. And most autists are good in maths.

Thor Kaufman · Post by **Thor Kaufman** » Sat Apr 14, 2007 4:04 pm

how come you became so rich, although you can't even count?