Ad blocker detected: Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker on our website.
Som Guy wrote:remeber ther is a way it could be taken out of his hands and besides he dosent sound to excited about the possible production of fallout 3
"There is a way it could be taken out of his hands"?
Frankly, his hands are no where near Fallout.
Tim Cain works in Troika.
Troika can't make a Fallout game. (copyrights).
Just give them fucking time man if you look around at other games like diablo, Jedi Knight, Castle Wolfenstein, Warcearf III It taken them years just to start making the games like diablo was made in 1996 and diablo ii in 2000 or 1,
Castle Wolfenstein like 10 fucking years, Warcreaf II was made in 1994 or something and the III in 2002 you see it takes a long time for um to make games there try to make shity new games when there can just make good old games but there morons and do not there wait like 5 years before there do/
Raymondo wrote:
Castle Wolfenstein like 10 fucking years, Warcreaf II was made in 1994 or something and the III in 2002 you see it takes a long time for um to make games
Raymondo wrote:
Castle Wolfenstein like 10 fucking years, Warcreaf II was made in 1994 or something and the III in 2002 you see it takes a long time for um to make games
. i think the graphics should stay almost exactly the same but maybe have a better gamma correction
Good point! That's exacly what FoT is. I'm not saying graph in FoT was bad, however there are not too many textures - even less than in Fo2. The reason is known - as i said it's a lot of work. You have to animate every armor with every weapon (only the main character - 7x40=?). And an average animation consists of about 10-20 pictures. As i noticed many of you want to have combined armor in 2d... he he he! Another thing is that FoT has already shown us that 2d with too many details goes slowly - even on Athlon 1.4Ghz and GeForce2 64.
how would customized armor work? Wouldnt you just have diffrent protection depending on what they targeted? Also i do think that in fallout tactics they ruined the pics of supermutants,ghouls,deathclaws,and robots
i mean reallly why would you want to see a robot that dosent look like mr. handy
Raymondo wrote:
Castle Wolfenstein like 10 fucking years, Warcreaf II was made in 1994 or something and the III in 2002 you see it takes a long time for um to make games
Err, what the fuck?
WHAT!!!!
Your post isn't coherent, so instead of saying WHAT!!!! you could try and explain it a little better.
Raymondo wrote:
Castle Wolfenstein like 10 fucking years, Warcreaf II was made in 1994 or something and the III in 2002 you see it takes a long time for um to make games
That's exacly what FoT is. I'm not saying graph in FoT was bad, however there are not too many textures - even less than in Fo2. The reason is known - as i said it's a lot of work. You have to animate every armor with every weapon (only the main character - 7x40=?). And an average animation consists of about 10-20 pictures. As i noticed many of you want to have combined armor in 2d... he he he! Another thing is that FoT has already shown us that 2d with too many details goes slowly - even on Athlon 1.4Ghz and GeForce2 64.
