Duck and Cover

popscythe wrote:But you can fuck off with your role call.

So that's one for team gay, Daryl and Urizen make 3. Anyone else? Maybe we finally found a way to form two DAC softball teams for competitions.

popscythe rocks glocks and blasts shots into your locks leaves you smokin on the walk

popscythe wrote:Urizen, I'm gonna have to say that if you can't relate to the language used when some breeder douche is going off about their relationship, you need to examine your human condition a little more closely. Humans get into relationships, it's not a solely m/f thing, and being gay doesn't have anything to do with it, unless you hork in your mouth at the word she and can't look past the context to the common denominator.

Agreed.

that's not quite what i said, though, so i don't know what darryl is so agreeable about.

Urizen wrote:that's not quite what i said, though, so i don't know what darryl is so agreeable about.

People keep saying darryl, lol.

this thread is gay

congrats popscythe on giving it a meaningful kick

Urizen wrote:i haven't seen those numbers before, but i know that most professionals now think gayness has to do with both genes and with pre-birth hormone levels, so i'll assume that you're right, or at least close to the truth. i still wouldn't call that a character trait, though, but i'll agree that it contributes to traits that may develop later in life. :vague:

I have no intention to back up my claims. However, empirical evidence suggests that gay people often have certain behavioral mannerisms, which can feel strange to a heterosexual. I've always had the impression that spotting a gay person(especially a male) from a crowd isn't that hard. Or maybe my reality has been distorted by television fashion shows. Just out of curiosity, how do you spot a gay person?

Also, [image of Dreadnought's cock]

i don't. if they're very feminine i can make a guess, but i've never seen someone and said to myself "he's gay".

A couple of weeks ago I met a girl in a bar, and I was 100% sure she was a dyke: shaved head, lots of facial piercing and tatoos, complemented by a black wife-beater, military style pants and military boots. After several beers it turned out that she was heterosexual. That said, empirical evidence is a fuckload of shit.

EDIT: it WAS clitoris, I SWEAR!!

Urizen wrote:i don't. if they're very feminine i can make a guess, but i've never seen someone and said to myself "he's gay".

So how do you make new gay acquaintances; purely out of coincidence? Or do you just ask?

A couple of weeks ago I met a girl in a bar, and I was 100% sure she was a dyke: shaved head, lots of facial piercing and tatoos, complemented by a black wife-beater, military style pants and military boots. After several beers it turned out that she was heterosexual. That said, empirical evidence is a fuckload of shit.

I've also made a similar assumption and been wrong. Dunno, maybe it's harder to spot female behaviorisms. Besides, you were mostly describing the physical appearance.

VasikkA wrote:

Urizen wrote:i don't. if they're very feminine i can make a guess, but i've never seen someone and said to myself "he's gay".

So how do you make new gay acquaintances; purely out of coincidence? Or do you just ask?

yeah, coincidence mostly. that's how i met the bf.

Urizen wrote:yeah, coincidence mostly. that's how i met the bf.

was it like: "yeah man, you're da best friend evah! With you, I could drink all the beer in da world! You're pure win, man! :queer glances: :awkward silence: :awkward silence::awkward silence::awkward silence: wanna get it on? :gay love:"?

not quite. he was just a friend of a friend. but i've done what you describe with straight guys, though we didn't get quite as far as in your version.

Urizen wrote:not quite. he was just a friend of a friend. but i've done what you describe with straight guys, though we didn't get quite as far as in your version.

"Jousting"

popscythe is actually spigot from jerkcity. LETS GET HIGH BEFORE BREAKFAST, LICK EACH OTHERS DICKS AND MAKE PERL JOKES UNFFFFHUAGHAUGHL :'98: :hypno:

atoga is becoming more incomprehensible than Blargh.

Such persistent, consistency. Fixed. You see my words. Looking past the meaning that isn't, that couldn't be. There, or anytime.

I see your words. Laughingly.

I think this topic should mark the last time I try to type things without more screaming and cursing.

21 bong salute, gentlemen.

http://www.fresh99.com/images/funnyweed ... g-bong.jpg

Subhuman wrote:atoga is becoming more incomprehensible than Blargh.

True, but to be fair, it seems Blargh has stepped down from the pedestal of dada.