The question is not why do something, it's why not.

Taco-Hero · Post by **Taco-Hero** » Tue Oct 05, 2010 10:25 pm

I'm not going to read this. I don't need a reason why.

Username · Post by **Username** » Tue Oct 05, 2010 11:46 pm

Noob. You need a reason not to read it.

SenisterDenister · Post by **SenisterDenister** » Tue Oct 05, 2010 11:53 pm

SenisterDenister wrote:
SenisterDenister wrote:How's about a friendly game of beer pong, then?

Taco-Hero · Post by **Taco-Hero** » Wed Oct 06, 2010 12:17 am

My God, Blargh's been posting a lot lately.

Cimmerian Nights · Post by **Cimmerian Nights** » Wed Oct 06, 2010 4:21 am

That's just wrong lifting Blargh's av like than and posting sober, coherent shit.

I don't appreciate it at all.

Post by **Retlaw83** » Wed Oct 06, 2010 6:49 pm

Cimmerian Nights wrote:That's just wrong lifting Blargh's av like than and posting sober, coherent shit.

I don't appreciate it at all.

Post by **Manoil** » Thu Oct 07, 2010 7:41 pm

Retlaw83 wrote:
Cimmerian Nights wrote:That's just wrong lifting Blargh's av like than and posting sober, coherent shit.

I don't appreciate it at all.

Agreed, it just feels... unnatural. Yonnie, just get an avatar of Joseph Ducreux

Blargh · Post by **Blargh** » Fri Oct 08, 2010 3:28 am

'Lifting' seems to imply an absence of consent. Not that consent would matter overmuch as this is a trifling matter of Internet.

Duck and Cover

The question is not why do something, it's why not.

Ducreux isn't a bad suggestion, though.