Ad blocker detected: Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker on our website.
I'm sorry, was it your intent to defer success ? If so : stick with it, as past comments support it being a notable strength of yours.
Howls like Porcelain wrote:win
Best become accustomed to this, and other meaningless setbacks, as you appear to be quite attached to rivaling the irrepressibly buoyant gormlessness of MR Snake.
So continues cheerfulness in making dull posts reflects Mr Snake?
If they are so dull I just wonder how dull your ever more evident basement life must be considering you and Retlaw keep reading and replying to them and I guess old Mr Snakes posts.
Au Contraire I don't find it dull to reply to you guys even though Retlaw is increasingly shooting down everyone and everything he keep missing a bit to much. It's quite fun when you're at home and bored.
Besides you guys do possess a nice vocabulary and that's great since I'm doing a test soon in among other things English
Username wrote:
Au Contraire I don't find it dull to reply to you guys even though Retlaw is increasingly shooting down everyone and everything he keep missing a bit to much.
I wouldn't be shooting you down if I was missing, you retard. Learn 2 English.
"You're going to have a tough time doing that without your head, palooka."
- the Vault Dweller
Nah Blargh now you're getting lost in your own rough terms.
I'm sure it's no true error but a minor mistake; still unsinkable would be parallel in that sentence as irrepressibly is in the previous?
Tenacity seems to fit better from what I can decipher is the meaning of buoyant. Then again the sentences approach the insult from two quite different paths.
I am confident that it would be prudent for you to refrain from attempting to assert, however shakily, the intent of words not your own. It paints you unfavourably. Of course, you're doubtlessly wondering how relevant this is when set against the sporadic yet relentless rain of shit that so encapsulates your posting, to which I would respond : It all adds up.
Scrotal Fugue wrote:wittier
Well gosh. I'd surely be offended if I considered you even marginally credible as a judge of such matters.
Blargh wrote:I am confident that it would be prudent for you to refrain from attempting to assert, however shakily, the intent of words not your own. It paints you unfavourably. Of course, you're doubtlessly wondering how relevant this is when set against the sporadic yet relentless rain of shit that so encapsulates your posting, to which I would respond : It all adds up.
Scrotal Fugue wrote:wittier
Well gosh. I'd surely be offended if I considered you even marginally credible as a judge of such matters.
So you'd say the second one was wittier?
That's like stooping below the gutter just cause the beggar passed you by on the street.
Damn foolish of you Blargh. Even if your opinion of me is the opinion of the forums general popolus your statement can only serve to drag you below me in the mind of any intelligent fellow.
Of course you will just disregard that again as the ramblings of a clown and thusly; etc ad infinitum.
_____
edited to please what ever quasi intelligentsia that might actually be real here.
Actually fuck it. I'm not sure.
Let's take this up to discussion.
Is it ad infinitum or in infinitum?
Ad would suggest towards, up to, for ****, towards.
Towards infinity, for ever in infinity, for ever and ever?
In infinitum is more to infinity, in infinity itself.
I've never really taken a latin class, just studied prefixes and suffixes of various words and combinations.
etc ad infinitum does seem more logical but one might wonder if "ETC" is even necessary then?
It would surely be necessary if one used "in infinitum".